• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动脉瓣狭窄:慢性充血性心力衰竭患者与非慢性充血性心力衰竭患者的比较。

Aortic valve stenosis: comparison of patients with to those without chronic congestive heart failure.

作者信息

Dineen E, Brent B N

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1986 Feb 15;57(6):419-22. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90764-2.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9149(86)90764-2
PMID:3946257
Abstract

Eighty-four patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS) and without other valvular or coronary artery disease were studied to investigate the pathophysiologic importance of hemodynamic and functional factors in the development of congestive heart failure (CHF). Thirty had clinical and radiographic signs of CHF. There was no significant difference between patients with and those without CHF in aortic valve index (0.26 +/- 0.09 vs 0.34 +/- 0.16 cm2/m2), mean aortic valve gradient (64 +/- 19 vs 59 +/- 25 mm Hg), left ventricular (LV) systolic pressure (201 +/- 31 vs 201 +/- 35 mm Hg), LV end-diastolic diameter (4.8 +/- 1.0 vs 4.4 +/- 0.7 cm) or posterior LV wall thickness (14.0 +/- 4.7 vs 15.0 +/- 30.0 mm). Patients with CHF had higher LV end-diastolic pressure (22 +/- 10 vs 16 +/- 7 mm Hg, p less than 0.005) and LV wall stress (370 +/- 138 vs 300 +/- 69 g/cm2, p less than 0.005) and lower cardiac index (2.0 +/- 0.5 vs 2.4 +/- 0.6 liters/min/m2, p less than 0.005) and LV ejection fraction (55 +/- 18 vs 68 +/- 13%, p less than 0.0005). An inverse linear relation (r = -0.59, p less than 0.01) was present between LV wall stress and LV ejection fraction such that as stress increased, LV ejection fraction fell. Values for both LV wall stress and LV ejection fraction overlapped considerably between the groups and, more important, only 40% of patients with CHF had a depressed LV ejection fraction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

对84例患有主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)且无其他瓣膜或冠状动脉疾病的患者进行了研究,以探讨血流动力学和功能因素在充血性心力衰竭(CHF)发生发展中的病理生理重要性。30例有CHF的临床和影像学体征。有CHF和无CHF的患者在主动脉瓣指数(0.26±0.09 vs 0.34±0.16 cm2/m2)、平均主动脉瓣压差(64±19 vs 59±25 mmHg)、左心室(LV)收缩压(201±31 vs 201±35 mmHg)、LV舒张末期直径(4.8±1.0 vs 4.4±0.7 cm)或LV后壁厚度(14.0±4.7 vs 15.0±30.0 mm)方面无显著差异。有CHF的患者LV舒张末期压力较高(22±10 vs 16±7 mmHg,p<0.005)和LV壁应力较高(370±138 vs 300±69 g/cm2,p<0.005),而心脏指数较低(2.0±0.5 vs 2.4±0.6升/分钟/平方米,p<0.005)和LV射血分数较低(55±18 vs 68±13%,p<0.0005)。LV壁应力与LV射血分数之间存在负线性关系(r = -0.59,p<0.01),即随着应力增加,LV射血分数下降。两组之间LV壁应力和LV射血分数的值有相当大的重叠,更重要的是,只有40%的CHF患者LV射血分数降低。(摘要截短于250字)

相似文献

1
Aortic valve stenosis: comparison of patients with to those without chronic congestive heart failure.主动脉瓣狭窄:慢性充血性心力衰竭患者与非慢性充血性心力衰竭患者的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 1986 Feb 15;57(6):419-22. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90764-2.
2
Systemic hypertension in low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction.射血分数保留的低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄中的系统性高血压。
Circulation. 2013 Sep 17;128(12):1349-53. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003071. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
3
Severe aortic stenosis with impaired left ventricular function and clinical heart failure: results of valve replacement.
Circulation. 1978 Aug;58(2):255-64. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.58.2.255.
4
Hemodynamic effects of nitroprusside on valvular aortic stenosis.硝普钠对瓣膜性主动脉瓣狭窄的血流动力学影响。
Am J Cardiol. 1992 Feb 1;69(4):361-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90234-p.
5
Assessment of systolic ventricular muscle function in man: the end systolic index.人体心室收缩肌功能评估:收缩末期指数
Herz. 1984 Oct;9(5):255-69.
6
Abnormal exercise hemodynamics in patients with normal systolic function late after aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术后晚期收缩功能正常患者的异常运动血流动力学。
Circulation. 1988 Mar;77(3):613-24. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.77.3.613.
7
Hemodynamic effects of pacing-induced tachycardia in valvular aortic stenosis.起搏诱发的心动过速在瓣膜性主动脉瓣狭窄中的血流动力学效应。
Can Med Assoc J. 1983 Jul 1;129(1):38-41.
8
Chronic pressure-overload hypertrophy attenuates vortex formation time in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular systolic function undergoing aortic valve replacement.慢性压力超负荷肥大可减轻左心室收缩功能正常的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者主动脉瓣置换术后的涡流形成时间。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013 Aug;27(4):660-4. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 May 30.
9
Improvement in symptoms and left ventricular performance after balloon aortic valvuloplasty in patients with aortic stenosis and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction.主动脉瓣狭窄合并左心室射血分数降低患者行球囊主动脉瓣成形术后症状及左心室功能的改善
Circulation. 1988 Nov;78(5 Pt 1):1181-91. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.78.5.1181.
10
Impact of chamber geometry and gender on left ventricular systolic function in patients > 60 years of age with aortic stenosis.年龄>60岁的主动脉瓣狭窄患者的心室几何形状和性别对左心室收缩功能的影响
Am J Cardiol. 1994 Oct 15;74(8):794-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90437-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Heart failure with a normal ejection fraction: treatments for a complex syndrome?射血分数正常的心力衰竭:针对复杂综合征的治疗方法?
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2012 Aug;14(4):305-18. doi: 10.1007/s11936-012-0187-4.
2
Titin isoform expression in aortic stenosis.肌联蛋白异构体在主动脉瓣狭窄中的表达。
Clin Sci (Lond). 2009 Aug 14;117(6):237-42. doi: 10.1042/CS20080248.
3
Left atrioventricular plane displacement but not left ventricular ejection fraction is influenced by the degree of aortic stenosis.左房室平面移位受主动脉狭窄程度的影响,而左心室射血分数不受其影响。
Heart. 2004 Oct;90(10):1151-5. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.020628.
4
Pulmonary oedema and pleural effusion in two patients with primary pulmonary hypertension treated with calcium channel blockers.两名原发性肺动脉高压患者使用钙通道阻滞剂治疗后出现肺水肿和胸腔积液。
Heart. 1996 Apr;75(4):383. doi: 10.1136/hrt.75.4.383.
5
Relation between symptoms and profiles of coronary artery blood flow velocities in patients with aortic valve stenosis: a study using transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography.主动脉瓣狭窄患者症状与冠状动脉血流速度分布的关系:一项经食管多普勒超声心动图研究
Heart. 1996 Apr;75(4):377-83. doi: 10.1136/hrt.75.4.377.
6
Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with congestive heart failure.充血性心力衰竭患者的左心室舒张功能障碍
J Natl Med Assoc. 1991 Jan;83(1):49-52.