Suppr超能文献

奥希替尼进展后表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的非小细胞肺癌患者的治疗模式及临床结局

Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With EGFR-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Progression on Osimertinib.

作者信息

Robinson Nathaniel D, Canavan Maureen E, Zhan Peter L, Udelsman Brooks V, Pathak Ranjan, Boffa Daniel J, Goldberg Sarah B

机构信息

Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

Clin Lung Cancer. 2025 Jan;26(1):9-17.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2024.09.006. Epub 2024 Sep 23.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

For patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progress on first-line osimertinib, the optimal second-line treatment regimen after progression is not known. We sought to assess practice patterns and evaluate the association between different therapies and survival in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC following progression on first-line osimertinib.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of patients who received first-line treatment with osimertinib using a population-based, multicenter nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database.

RESULTS

We identified 2373 patients who received first-line osimertinib. The majority (n = 2279) received osimertinib monotherapy. A total of 538 patients received first-line osimertinib and had second-line treatment data available. Second-line treatment regimens were varied: 65% (n = 348) included chemotherapy, 37% (n = 197) included an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), and 44% (n = 234) included an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). We then analyzed the 333 patients with performance status 0-2 who received chemotherapy with osimertinib (n = 107, 32%) versus chemotherapy without osimertinib (n = 226, 68%). The continuation of osimertinib with chemotherapy was associated with superior progression-free survival (PFS; median: 10.1 versus 5.9 months, Hazard Ratio [HR]: 0.48, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: [0.34, 0.68], P < .001) and overall survival (OS; median: 17.0 versus 12.8 months, HR: 0.64, 95% CI: [0.44, 0.93], P = .018) compared to other chemotherapy approaches without osimertinib. This effect was most pronounced in patients with an EGFR exon 19 deletion.

CONCLUSIONS

Following progression on osimertinib, a wide variety of treatment regimens were used. The continuation of osimertinib with chemotherapy in the second line was associated with increased PFS and OS.

摘要

引言

对于一线使用奥希替尼治疗后病情进展的晚期表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,病情进展后的最佳二线治疗方案尚不清楚。我们旨在评估治疗模式,并评估一线使用奥希替尼治疗病情进展后的EGFR突变NSCLC患者中不同治疗方法与生存之间的关联。

方法

使用基于人群的多中心全国性电子健康记录衍生的去识别数据库,对接受奥希替尼一线治疗的患者进行回顾性队列研究。

结果

我们确定了2373例接受一线奥希替尼治疗的患者。大多数(n = 2279)接受奥希替尼单药治疗。共有538例患者接受了一线奥希替尼治疗并可获得二线治疗数据。二线治疗方案各不相同:65%(n = 348)包括化疗,37%(n = 197)包括免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI),44%(n = 234)包括EGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)。然后,我们分析了333例体能状态为0 - 2且接受奥希替尼联合化疗(n = 107,32%)与不接受奥希替尼的化疗(n = 226,68%)的患者。与不使用奥希替尼的其他化疗方法相比,奥希替尼联合化疗与更好的无进展生存期(PFS;中位数:10.1个月对5.9个月,风险比[HR]:0.48,95%置信区间[CI]:[0.34, 0.68],P <.001)和总生存期(OS;中位数:17.0个月对12.8个月,HR:0.64,95% CI:[0.44, 0.93],P =.018)相关。这种效应在EGFR外显子19缺失的患者中最为明显。

结论

奥希替尼治疗病情进展后,使用了多种治疗方案。二线使用奥希替尼联合化疗与PFS和OS的增加相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验