• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前体位复位及术中提拉复位辅助下Mis-TLIF治疗峡部裂型腰椎滑脱症的临床研究

[Clinical study of isthmic spondylolisthesis treated with Mis-TLIF assisted by preoperative posture reduction and intraoperative lifting reduction].

作者信息

Lu Lian-Song, Sun Shao-Hua, Li Hao-Jie, Hu Yong, Ma Wei-Hu

机构信息

Department of Spinal Surgery, Ningbo No.6 Hospital. Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2024 Oct 25;37(10):965-71. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20231196.

DOI:10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20231196
PMID:39462954
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical effect of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(Mis-TLIF) technique combined with preoperative position reduction in the treatment of spondylolisthesis and summarize its advantages.

METHODS

Between July 2016 and July 2022, 60 patients with lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis were retrospectively analyzed, including 26 males and 34 females, with an average age of (51.32±4.24) years old ranging from 35 to 72 years old. They were divided into observation group and control group according to the operation methods. There were 30 patients in the observation group, including 12 males and 18 females;the age ranged from 35 to 71 years old with an average of(51.80±6.38) years old, the course of disease ranged from 12 to 60 months with an average of (24.17±1.98) months;there were 18 cases of L spondylolisthesis and 12 cases of L spondylolisthesis;according to Meyerding classification, there were 20 cases of grade Ⅰ spondylolisthesis and 10 cases of gradeⅡ. The observation group was treated with preoperative postural reduction combined with intraoperative reduction assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion via Quadrant channel(Mis-TLIF). There were 30 patients in the control group, including 14 males and 16 females, with an average of (50.00±4.24) years old ranging from 36 to 72 years old;the course of disease ranged from 12 to 60 months with an average of (23.70±1.53) months;there were 16 cases of L spondylolisthesis and 14 cases of L spondylolisthesis;according to Meyerding classification, there were 19 cases of grade Ⅰ spondylolisthesis and 11 cases of grade Ⅱ. The control group was treated with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(Open-TLIF). The differences of operation time, intraoperative and postoperative blood loss, hospital stay, radiation exposure time and complications between the two groups were analyzed. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA) score were used to evaluate the clinical effect. X-ray and CT were followed up to evaluate the interbody fusion.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up for 12 months. There was no significant difference in operation time, VAS of low back pain, slip angle and slip rate between two groups (>0.05). The intraoperative and postoperative blood loss in the observation group (165.50±15.56) ml and (59.17±10.59) ml were less than those in the control group (259.33±35.32) ml and (165.33 ±29.56) ml (<0.05). The length of hospital stay in the observation group (3.53±0.68) days was less than that in the control group (5.20±0.41) days (<0.05).The intervertebral space height, slip angle, slip rate, ODI, VAS and JOA scores were significantly improved in the two groups at the final follow-up (<0.05). There were significant differences in ODI [(9.93±1.11)% vs (10.93±1.11)%] and JOA [ (26.07±1.01) points vs (25.43±1.25) points] between the observation group and the control group at the final follow-up (<0.05).

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of spondylolisthesis, preoperative position reduction combined with intraoperative reduction assisted Mis-Tlif technique has advantages of less trauma, less bleeding and shorter hospitalization period than traditional open surgery. It is a safe and effective technique.

摘要

目的

探讨微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(Mis-TLIF)联合术前体位复位治疗腰椎滑脱症的临床效果并总结其优势。

方法

回顾性分析2016年7月至2022年7月间60例峡部裂型腰椎滑脱症患者,其中男性26例,女性34例,平均年龄(51.32±4.24)岁,年龄范围35至72岁。根据手术方式将其分为观察组和对照组。观察组30例,其中男性12例,女性18例;年龄范围35至71岁,平均(51.80±6.38)岁,病程12至60个月,平均(24.17±1.98)个月;L椎体滑脱18例,L椎体滑脱12例;按Meyerding分级,Ⅰ度滑脱20例,Ⅱ度滑脱10例。观察组采用术前体位复位联合术中复位辅助经Quadrant通道微创经椎间孔腰椎融合术(Mis-TLIF)治疗。对照组30例,其中男性14例,女性16例,平均(50.00±4.24)岁,年龄范围36至72岁;病程12至60个月,平均(23.70±1.53)个月;L椎体滑脱16例,L椎体滑脱14例;按Meyerding分级,Ⅰ度滑脱19例,Ⅱ度滑脱11例。对照组采用开放经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(Open-TLIF)治疗。分析两组手术时间、术中及术后出血量、住院时间、辐射暴露时间及并发症的差异。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)及日本骨科学会(JOA)评分评估临床效果。通过X线和CT随访评估椎间融合情况。

结果

所有患者均随访12个月。两组手术时间、下腰痛VAS、滑脱角及滑脱率比较差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。观察组术中及术后出血量(165.50±15.56)ml和(59.17±10.59)ml少于对照组(259.33±35.32)ml和(165.33±29.56)ml(<0.05)。观察组住院时间(3.53±0.68)天短于对照组(5.20±0.41)天(<0.05)。末次随访时两组椎间高度、滑脱角、滑脱率、ODI、VAS及JOA评分均显著改善(<0.05)。末次随访时观察组与对照组ODI[(9.93±1.11)%对(10.93±1.11)%]及JOA[(26.07±1.01)分对(25.43±1.25)分]比较差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。

结论

在腰椎滑脱症治疗中,术前体位复位联合术中复位辅助Mis-Tlif技术相较于传统开放手术具有创伤小、出血少、住院时间短的优势。是一种安全有效的技术。

相似文献

1
[Clinical study of isthmic spondylolisthesis treated with Mis-TLIF assisted by preoperative posture reduction and intraoperative lifting reduction].术前体位复位及术中提拉复位辅助下Mis-TLIF治疗峡部裂型腰椎滑脱症的临床研究
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2024 Oct 25;37(10):965-71. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20231196.
2
[Treatment of grade I and II degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant channel].[象限通道下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗Ⅰ、Ⅱ度退行性腰椎滑脱症]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019 Mar 25;32(3):199-206. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.03.002.
3
[Two different techniques combined with MIS-TLIF in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis:a case-control study].[两种不同技术联合微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症:一项病例对照研究]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2022 May 25;35(5):409-17. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2022.05.002.
4
[Comparison of mid-term effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion assisted with three-dimensional microscope in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis].[单侧双通道内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与三维显微镜辅助下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症的中期疗效比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Jan 15;37(1):52-58. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202210017.
5
Percutaneous Endoscopic Robot-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PE RA-TLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Technical Note and Two Years Clinical Results.经皮内镜机器人辅助经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(PE RA-TLIF)治疗腰椎滑脱:技术说明和两年临床结果。
Pain Physician. 2022 Jan;25(1):E73-E86.
6
Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.机器人辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与单节段腰椎滑脱症斜侧方腰椎体间融合术的疗效比较。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Oct;13(7):2093-2101. doi: 10.1111/os.13151. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
7
[Clinical and radiologic comparison between oblique lateral interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis].[斜外侧椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症的临床与影像学比较]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2023 May 25;36(5):414-9. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.05.004.
8
Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.机器人辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Oct;13(7):1960-1968. doi: 10.1111/os.13044. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
9
[Clinical outcomes of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bilateral tubular channels].[单节段腰椎滑脱症经双侧通道微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的临床疗效]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Apr 1;55(4):279-284. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2017.04.009.
10
Can minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion achieve a better clinical and radiological outcome than traditional open technique in isthmic spondylolisthesis?微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与传统开放手术治疗峡部裂性腰椎滑脱症的临床和影像学效果比较
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Aug 29;19(1):523. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04994-4.