• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Construction and Psychometric Evaluation of the Critical Thinking Disposition Assessment Questionnaire Among Medical Undergraduate Students in West Bengal, India.印度西孟加拉邦医科大学生批判性思维倾向评估问卷的编制与心理测量学评价
Cureus. 2024 Sep 26;16(9):e70266. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70266. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Critical Thinking and Clinical Reasoning in Undergraduate Medical Course: A Mixed-Methods Study in a Medical College in Kolkata, West Bengal, India.本科医学课程中的批判性思维和临床推理:印度西孟加拉邦加尔各答一所医学院的混合方法研究。
F1000Res. 2024 Apr 11;13:259. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.146009.1. eCollection 2024.
3
Development and validation of the critical thinking disposition inventory for Chinese medical college students (CTDI-M).发展和验证中国医学生批判性思维倾向量表(CTDI-M)。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1593-z.
4
Psychometric properties of the critical thinking disposition assessment test amongst medical students in China: a cross-sectional study.中国医学生批判性思维倾向评估测试的心理测量学特性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02437-2.
5
Assessment of the psychometric properties of the Vietnamese version of the Critical Thinking Disposition Scale.评估越南版批判性思维倾向量表的心理测量特性。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Aug;127:105848. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105848. Epub 2023 May 23.
6
Development and validation of a delirium care critical-thinking scale for intensive care unit nurses: A mixed-method study.开发并验证 ICU 护士谵妄护理批判性思维量表:一项混合方法研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Apr;33(4):1387-1397. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16997. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
7
Critical thinking disposition as a measure of competent clinical judgment: the development of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory.批判性思维倾向作为衡量临床判断能力的指标:《加利福尼亚批判性思维倾向问卷》的编制
J Nurs Educ. 1994 Oct;33(8):345-50. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19941001-05.
8
Development and psychometric testing of the Carter Assessment of Critical Thinking in Midwifery (Preceptor/Mentor version).《卡特助产批判性思维评估(带教老师/导师版)》的编制与心理测量学测试
Midwifery. 2016 Mar;34:141-149. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.12.002. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
9
Assessing the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory.评估中文版加利福尼亚批判性思维倾向问卷的信效度。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2002 Feb;39(2):123-32. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(01)00019-0.
10
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Malay Version of the Communication Skills Attitude Scale (CSAS) among Medical Students in Malaysia.马来版本沟通技巧态度量表(CSAS)在马来西亚医学生中的跨文化调适及心理计量特性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 5;18(7):3778. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073778.

本文引用的文献

1
Critical Thinking and Clinical Reasoning in Undergraduate Medical Course: A Mixed-Methods Study in a Medical College in Kolkata, West Bengal, India.本科医学课程中的批判性思维和临床推理:印度西孟加拉邦加尔各答一所医学院的混合方法研究。
F1000Res. 2024 Apr 11;13:259. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.146009.1. eCollection 2024.
2
Developing critical thinking skills for delivering optimal care.培养批判性思维,提供最佳护理。
Intern Med J. 2021 Apr;51(4):488-493. doi: 10.1111/imj.15272.
3
Psychometric properties of the critical thinking disposition assessment test amongst medical students in China: a cross-sectional study.中国医学生批判性思维倾向评估测试的心理测量学特性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02437-2.
4
Development and validation of the critical thinking disposition inventory for Chinese medical college students (CTDI-M).发展和验证中国医学生批判性思维倾向量表(CTDI-M)。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1593-z.
5
Measurement of critical thinking, clinical reasoning, and clinical judgment in culturally diverse nursing students - A literature review.不同文化背景护理专业学生批判性思维、临床推理和临床判断的测量——文献综述
Nurse Educ Pract. 2018 May;30:91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
6
Critical thinking in healthcare and education.医疗保健与教育中的批判性思维。
BMJ. 2017 May 16;357:j2234. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2234.
7
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
8
Validation of Yoon's Critical Thinking Disposition Instrument.尹氏批判性思维倾向量表的验证
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2015 Dec;9(4):342-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
9
Critical thinking in health professions education: summary and consensus statements of the Millennium Conference 2011.健康职业教育中的批判性思维:2011 千年会议总结与共识声明。
Teach Learn Med. 2014;26(1):95-102. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2013.857335.
10
Critical thinking versus clinical reasoning versus clinical judgment: differential diagnosis.批判性思维与临床推理与临床判断:鉴别诊断。
Nurse Educ. 2013 Jan-Feb;38(1):34-6. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e318276dfbe.

印度西孟加拉邦医科大学生批判性思维倾向评估问卷的编制与心理测量学评价

Construction and Psychometric Evaluation of the Critical Thinking Disposition Assessment Questionnaire Among Medical Undergraduate Students in West Bengal, India.

作者信息

Mukhopadhyay Diptakanti, Choudhari Sonali G

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine & Sagore Dutta Hospital, Kolkata, IND.

Department of Community Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Sep 26;16(9):e70266. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70266. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.70266
PMID:39463669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11512594/
Abstract

Introduction Assessing the critical thinking disposition of students with a valid tool in an Indian setting was a prerequisite to introducing critical thinking under the undergraduate medical curriculum, as it was shaped by society, culture, and language. The study planned to design and assess the psychometrics of the Critical Thinking Disposition Assessment Questionnaire (CTDAQ) in the Indian setting. Methods The study was conducted among undergraduate students at a medical college in West Bengal, India. A 30-item scale was initially designed through the review of relevant literature and discussion with experts. Through two rounds of the Delphi technique, a 20-item CTDAQ was formulated, and the content validity index (CVI) was calculated. The test-retest agreement was calculated after administering the tool twice among 25 students with a gap of three weeks using the weighted kappa coefficient. Then, principal component analysis was conducted to extract component structure with rotation. The internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha. Results Item-wise and scale CVIs were more than 0.80 and 0.90, respectively. All items had a weighted kappa coefficient of ≥0.75. A three-component model was extracted from 20 items, with a minimum factor loading of 0.30. It explained 50.3% of the total variance. Cronbach's alpha of the scale, the component with seven items, the component with nine items, and the component with four items were 0.783, 0.789, 0.825, and 0.797, respectively. Conclusions The 20-item CTDAQ is psychometrically a valid, stable, and internally consistent scale to assess critical thinking disposition in the Indian context.

摘要

引言 在印度环境中,使用有效的工具评估学生的批判性思维倾向是在本科医学课程中引入批判性思维的先决条件,因为它受到社会、文化和语言的影响。本研究计划在印度环境中设计和评估批判性思维倾向评估问卷(CTDAQ)的心理测量学特性。

方法 本研究在印度西孟加拉邦一所医学院的本科生中进行。最初通过对相关文献的回顾和与专家的讨论设计了一个包含30个条目的量表。通过两轮德尔菲技术,制定了一个包含20个条目的CTDAQ,并计算了内容效度指数(CVI)。在25名学生中,间隔三周对该工具进行两次施测,使用加权kappa系数计算重测一致性。然后,进行主成分分析以提取旋转后的成分结构。使用克朗巴赫α系数测量内部一致性。

结果 各条目和量表的CVI分别大于0.80和0.90。所有条目的加权kappa系数均≥0.75。从20个条目中提取了一个三成分模型,最小因子载荷为0.30。它解释了总方差的50.3%。该量表、包含7个条目的成分、包含9个条目的成分和包含4个条目的成分的克朗巴赫α系数分别为0.783、0.789、0.825和0.797。

结论 在印度背景下,20个条目的CTDAQ在心理测量学上是一个有效、稳定且内部一致的量表,用于评估批判性思维倾向。