• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英、美两国社会处方项目的筹资方式

Financing Approaches to Social Prescribing Programs in England and the United States.

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 2022 Jun;100(2):393-423. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12562. Epub 2022 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.12562
PMID:35348249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9205663/
Abstract

Policy Points The number of social prescribing practices, which aim to link patients with nonmedical services and supports to address patients' social needs, is increasing in both England and the United States. Traditional health care financing mechanisms were not designed to support social prescribing practices, and flexible payment approaches may not support their widespread adoption. Policymakers in both countries are shifting toward developing explicit financing streams for social prescribing programs. Consequently, we need an evaluation of them to assess their success in supporting both the acceptance of these programs and their impacts. Investment in community-based organizations and wider public services will likely be crucial to both the long-term effectiveness and the sustainability of social prescribing.

摘要

政策要点 在英国和美国,旨在将患者与非医疗服务和支持联系起来以满足患者的社会需求的社会处方实践的数量正在增加。传统的医疗保健融资机制并非旨在支持社会处方实践,灵活的支付方式可能无法支持其广泛采用。这两个国家的政策制定者都在转向为社会处方计划制定明确的融资渠道。因此,我们需要对其进行评估,以评估它们在支持这些计划的接受度及其影响方面的成功程度。对社区组织和更广泛的公共服务的投资可能对社会处方的长期有效性和可持续性都至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2314/9205663/1571a801d8b3/MILQ-100-393-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2314/9205663/1571a801d8b3/MILQ-100-393-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2314/9205663/1571a801d8b3/MILQ-100-393-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Financing Approaches to Social Prescribing Programs in England and the United States.英、美两国社会处方项目的筹资方式
Milbank Q. 2022 Jun;100(2):393-423. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12562. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
2
Impact of a social prescribing intervention in North East England on adults with type 2 diabetes: the SPRING_NE multimethod study.英格兰东北部社会处方干预对 2 型糖尿病成人的影响:SPRING_NE 多方法研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Mar;11(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/AQXC8219.
3
What is the best way to evaluate social prescribing? A qualitative feasibility assessment for a national impact evaluation study in England.评估社会处方的最佳方法是什么?一项针对英格兰全国性影响评估研究的定性可行性评估。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2024 Apr;29(2):111-121. doi: 10.1177/13558196231212854. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
COVID-19: The Time for Collaboration Between Long-Term Services and Supports, Health Care Systems, and Public Health Is Now.COVID-19:现在是长期服务和支持、医疗保健系统以及公共卫生之间合作的时刻。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):565-594. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12500. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
6
Searching for Real-World Effectiveness of Health Care Innovations: Scoping Study of Social Prescribing for Diabetes.探寻医疗保健创新的真实世界有效性:糖尿病社会处方的范围界定研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 2;19(2):e20. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6431.
7
A comparison of social prescribing approaches across twelve high-income countries.十二项高收入国家社会处方方法比较。
Health Policy. 2024 Apr;142:104992. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.104992. Epub 2024 Jan 21.
8
The Impact of the Great Recession on Long-Term Services and Supports in the United States and England.《大衰退对美国和英国长期服务和支持的影响》。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Jan-Feb;32(1):15-30. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1563470. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
9
Social Prescribing in National Health Service Primary Care: What Are the Ethical Considerations?国家卫生服务初级保健中的社会处方:有哪些伦理考虑?
Milbank Q. 2021 Sep;99(3):610-628. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12516. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
10
Financing The Infrastructure Of Accountable Communities For Health Is Key To Long-Term Sustainability.为健康责任社区的基础设施提供资金是长期可持续性的关键。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Apr;39(4):670-678. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01581.

引用本文的文献

1
The potentials of digital technology in social prescribing: a qualitative study of key stakeholders' perspectives.数字技术在社会处方中的潜力:对关键利益相关者观点的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 31;25(1):2012. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23091-7.
2
Co-designing implementation strategies for social prescribing in Lancashire and South Cumbria: a qualitative study with a participatory approach.共同设计兰开夏郡和南坎布里亚郡社会处方的实施策略:一项采用参与式方法的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 2;15(4):e094522. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094522.
3
Characterizing a heterogeneous chronic patient population for redesigning person-centred bundled payment models using risk-mitigating measures.

本文引用的文献

1
Integrated health and care systems in England: can they help prevent disease?英国的综合健康与护理体系:它们能帮助预防疾病吗?
Integr Healthc J. 2020 Feb 26;2(1):e000013. doi: 10.1136/ihj-2019-000013. eCollection 2020.
2
Integrated Health and Social Care in the United States: A Decade of Policy Progress.美国的综合健康与社会关怀:十年政策进展
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Oct 29;21(4):9. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5687. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
3
Integrated Care in England - what can we Learn from a Decade of National Pilot Programmes?
利用风险缓解措施对异质性慢性患者群体进行特征分析,以重新设计以患者为中心的捆绑支付模式。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Mar 15. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01762-x.
4
The challenges and rewards of social prescribing in family medicine.家庭医学中社会处方的挑战与回报。
Front Health Serv. 2024 Oct 14;4:1446397. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1446397. eCollection 2024.
5
Stakeholder views on addressing challenges to the implementation of social prescribing in the United Kingdom.利益相关者对英国社会处方实施挑战应对措施的看法。
Front Health Serv. 2024 Oct 11;4:1413711. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1413711. eCollection 2024.
6
The performance of general practice in the English National Health Service (NHS): an analysis using Starfield's framework for primary care.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中全科医疗的表现:一项使用斯塔菲尔德初级医疗框架的分析
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Feb 23;2(3):qxae022. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae022. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
Survey of general practitioners' awareness, practice and perception of social prescribing across Europe.欧洲全科医生对社会处方认知、实践和看法的调查。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec;30(1):2351806. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2351806. Epub 2024 May 17.
8
Improving health equity through health care systems research.通过医疗体系研究提高卫生公平性。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec;58 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):289-299. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14192.
9
Nature-Based Interventions in the UK: A Mixed Methods Study Exploring Green Prescribing for Promoting the Mental Wellbeing of Young Pregnant Women.基于自然的干预措施在英国:一项混合方法研究,探讨绿色处方对促进年轻孕妇心理健康的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Oct 13;20(20):6921. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20206921.
10
Establishing internationally accepted conceptual and operational definitions of social prescribing through expert consensus: a Delphi study.通过专家共识,为社会处方制定国际认可的概念和操作定义:德尔菲研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 14;13(7):e070184. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070184.
英国的综合医疗服务——从十年国家试点项目中我们能学到什么?
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Oct 29;21(4):5. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5631. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
4
Social Prescribing in National Health Service Primary Care: What Are the Ethical Considerations?国家卫生服务初级保健中的社会处方:有哪些伦理考虑?
Milbank Q. 2021 Sep;99(3):610-628. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12516. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
5
Analysis of Medicare Advantage Plans' Supplemental Benefits and Variation by County.医疗保险优势计划补充福利分析及按县分类的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2114359. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14359.
6
Workforce Models to Screen for and Address Patients' Unmet Social Needs in the Clinic Setting: A Scoping Review.在临床环境中筛查和满足患者未满足的社会需求的劳动力模型:范围综述。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211021021. doi: 10.1177/21501327211021021.
7
Will a new NHS structure in England help recovery from the pandemic?英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)的新架构会有助于从疫情中恢复过来吗?
BMJ. 2021 Feb 3;372:n248. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n248.
8
Money Moves the Mare: The Response of Community-Based Organizations to Health Care's Embrace of Social Determinants.金钱推动母马前行:社区组织对医疗保健拥抱社会决定因素的反应。
Milbank Q. 2021 Mar;99(1):171-208. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12491. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
9
Addressing Social Needs in Health Care Settings: Evidence, Challenges, and Opportunities for Public Health.在医疗保健环境中满足社会需求:公共卫生的证据、挑战和机遇。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;42:329-344. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102204. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
10
If social determinants of health are so important, shouldn't we ask patients about them?如果健康的社会决定因素如此重要,我们难道不应该询问患者这些因素吗?
BMJ. 2020 Nov 24;371:m4150. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4150.