Suppr超能文献

儿童和青少年的数字位置跟踪:一个理论框架与综述

Digital Location Tracking of Children and Adolescents: A Theoretical Framework and Review.

作者信息

Davis Isabella S, Thornburg Makayla A, Patel Herry, Pelham William E

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.

出版信息

Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2024 Dec;27(4):943-965. doi: 10.1007/s10567-024-00500-8. Epub 2024 Oct 28.

Abstract

Many parents in the U.S. have begun using GPS-based digital location tracking (DLT) technologies (smartphones, tags, wearables) to track the whereabouts of children and adolescents. This paper lays the foundation for an emerging science of DLT by performing the first theoretical analysis and review of empirical literature on DLT. First, we develop a framework to clarify how DLT should be conceptualized and measured, how it compares to historical strategies for monitoring youths' location, and the mechanisms by which it might affect youth adjustment. Second, we review what is known about DLT today, finding that (1) DLT use is now common from childhood to emerging adulthood, with 33-69% of U.S. families using it; (2) there are sociodemographic differences in DLT use; (3) DLT use has significant cross-sectional associations with other parenting behaviors, with family functioning, and with youth adjustment; and (4) there is much speculation, but minimal data, about the new ethical and developmental issues that might arise from DLT use (e.g., privacy invasions). Third, we critique the existing evidence base to outline priorities for future research, emphasizing the need for longitudinal data, better measurement, and moving beyond convenience samples. We conclude that DLT is a new, common, and vastly understudied parenting behavior of clinical and developmental relevance.

摘要

美国许多家长已开始使用基于全球定位系统(GPS)的数字定位跟踪(DLT)技术(智能手机、标签、可穿戴设备)来追踪儿童和青少年的行踪。本文通过对DLT的实证文献进行首次理论分析和综述,为一门新兴的DLT科学奠定了基础。首先,我们构建了一个框架,以阐明应如何对DLT进行概念化和测量,它与监测青少年行踪的历史策略相比如何,以及它可能影响青少年适应的机制。其次,我们回顾了目前关于DLT的已知情况,发现:(1)从童年到成年初期,DLT的使用现在很普遍,33%-69%的美国家庭使用该技术;(2)DLT的使用存在社会人口统计学差异;(3)DLT的使用与其他育儿行为、家庭功能以及青少年适应存在显著的横断面关联;(4)对于DLT使用可能引发的新的伦理和发展问题(如侵犯隐私),有很多猜测,但数据极少。第三,我们对现有证据基础进行了批判,以概述未来研究的重点,强调需要纵向数据、更好的测量方法,并超越便利样本。我们得出结论,DLT是一种新的、常见的且研究严重不足的育儿行为,具有临床和发展相关性。

相似文献

5
A Call to Expand the Scope of Digital Phenotyping.呼吁拓展数字表型学的研究范畴
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 14;25:e39546. doi: 10.2196/39546.
9
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.

引用本文的文献

4
What is Parental Monitoring?什么是父母监督?
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2024 Jun;27(2):576-601. doi: 10.1007/s10567-024-00490-7. Epub 2024 Jun 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Theory for How Parental Monitoring Changes Youth Behavior.父母监督如何改变青少年行为的理论。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2025 Jan;13(1):18-42. doi: 10.1177/21677026241232926. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
3
What is Parental Monitoring?什么是父母监督?
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2024 Jun;27(2):576-601. doi: 10.1007/s10567-024-00490-7. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
8
Annual Research Review: Cross-cultural similarities and differences in parenting.年度研究综述:育儿的跨文化相似与差异。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022 Apr;63(4):466-479. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13539. Epub 2021 Nov 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验