Suppr超能文献

实验室助教如何学习支持科学实践?探索教师推理与行动的交集。

How do Laboratory Teaching Assistants Learn to Support Science Practices? Exploring the Intersection Between Instructor Reasoning and Actions.

机构信息

Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Georgia, Athens 30602, GA.

Molecular and Cellular Biology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

出版信息

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Dec;23(4):ar56. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-03-0118.

Abstract

Undergraduate laboratory courses can provide opportunities for students to participate in science practices. This requires rethinking both curricula and instruction. Science practice-based courses require students to be positioned as epistemic agents, implying a shift in instructor role. Teaching assistants (TAs) are the primary instructors for laboratory courses. The current study aims to understand how TAs support students in science practices. Specifically, we sought to characterize variation in teaching and to understand how TAs learned and adapted their teaching approaches over time. Our study takes place in the context of a large, introductory laboratory course, Authentic Inquiry through Modeling in Biology (AIB-Bio). Our approach investigated the intersection between instructor reasoning and actions using stimulated-recall interviews, where instructors reflected on audio recordings from their classrooms. Application of our conceptual framework revealed that TAs' instructional roles and purposes were fluid and influenced how they supported students' science practices. We also showed how interactions with students cued fluctuations in TAs instructional approaches. Results include a case study that suggests potential mechanisms for TA learning. We propose a model to explain the variation in the enactment of a science practice-based curricula. We end with practical implications to consider when building professional development for science practice-based instruction.

摘要

本科实验室课程可为学生参与科学实践提供机会。这需要重新思考课程和教学。基于科学实践的课程要求学生将自己定位为认识主体,这意味着教师角色的转变。助教(TA)是实验室课程的主要教师。本研究旨在了解助教如何支持学生进行科学实践。具体而言,我们试图描述教学中的差异,并理解助教如何随着时间的推移学习和调整他们的教学方法。我们的研究是在一门大型的生物学入门实验室课程——通过建模进行真实探究(Authentic Inquiry through Modeling in Biology,简称 AIB-Bio)的背景下进行的。我们的方法通过激发式回忆访谈调查了教师推理和行动之间的交叉点,在访谈中,教师对课堂录音进行反思。我们的概念框架的应用表明,助教的教学角色和目的是灵活的,并影响他们支持学生科学实践的方式。我们还展示了与学生的互动如何引发助教教学方法的波动。研究结果包括一个案例研究,该研究提出了助教学习的潜在机制。我们提出了一个模型来解释基于科学实践的课程实施中的差异。最后,我们提出了一些实际影响,以供在构建基于科学实践的教学专业发展时考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81b2/11659852/3b34850a23af/cbe-23-ar56-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验