• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过基于模型的探究支持科学实践:学生在实验室体验中处理数据、不确定性和社区的视角。

Supporting Scientific Practice through Model-Based Inquiry: A Students'-Eye View of Grappling with Data, Uncertainty, and Community in a Laboratory Experience.

机构信息

Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721.

Departments of Education and Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155.

出版信息

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Dec;20(4):ar59. doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-05-0128.

DOI:10.1187/cbe.21-05-0128
PMID:34678041
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8715772/
Abstract

Modeling is a scientific practice that supports creative reasoning, motivates inquiry, and facilitates community sense-making. This paper explores students' perspectives on modeling in an undergraduate laboratory course, Authentic Inquiry through Modeling (AIM-Bio), in which they proposed, tested, and revised their own models. We conducted comparative case studies of eight students over a semester. Students described using models to support multiple forms of scientific reasoning and hypothesis generation. They recounted the challenges of dealing with uncertainty and integrating diverse ideas. They also described how these challenges pushed their thinking. Overall, students reported feeling a sense of scientific authenticity and agency through their modeling experience. We additionally provide an in-depth look at two students whose unique experiences in AIM-Bio emphasize the variable ways modeling can support inquiry learning. We claim that modeling emerged as a legitimate practice among students, because the AIM-Bio curriculum encouraged diversity in students' models, provided opportunities for students to grapple with uncertainty, and fostered collaboration between students. We suggest that biology educators consider how model-based inquiry can allow students to participate in science, as a way to support interest in, identification with, and ultimately persistence in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields.

摘要

建模是一种支持创造性推理、激发探究、促进社区意义建构的科学实践。本文探讨了学生在本科实验室课程(通过建模的真实探究,Authentic Inquiry through Modeling,简称 AIM-Bio)中对建模的看法,在该课程中学生提出、测试和修改自己的模型。我们对一个学期中的 8 名学生进行了比较案例研究。学生们描述了使用模型来支持多种形式的科学推理和假设生成。他们讲述了处理不确定性和整合不同想法的挑战。他们还描述了这些挑战如何推动他们的思维。总的来说,学生们通过建模体验报告了一种科学真实性和自主性的感觉。我们还深入研究了两名学生,他们在 AIM-Bio 中的独特经历强调了建模可以支持探究学习的多种方式。我们认为,建模作为一种合法的实践出现在学生中,是因为 AIM-Bio 课程鼓励学生的模型多样化,为学生处理不确定性提供机会,并促进学生之间的合作。我们建议生物学教育者考虑基于模型的探究如何让学生参与科学,以此来支持他们对科学、技术、工程和数学领域的兴趣、认同和最终坚持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eec/8715772/dbf943521be1/cbe-20-ar59-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eec/8715772/2b55b82c25f9/cbe-20-ar59-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eec/8715772/4a4390657fce/cbe-20-ar59-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eec/8715772/a96fa2bfab4b/cbe-20-ar59-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eec/8715772/316cf52d25aa/cbe-20-ar59-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eec/8715772/dbf943521be1/cbe-20-ar59-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eec/8715772/2b55b82c25f9/cbe-20-ar59-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eec/8715772/4a4390657fce/cbe-20-ar59-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eec/8715772/a96fa2bfab4b/cbe-20-ar59-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eec/8715772/316cf52d25aa/cbe-20-ar59-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eec/8715772/dbf943521be1/cbe-20-ar59-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Supporting Scientific Practice through Model-Based Inquiry: A Students'-Eye View of Grappling with Data, Uncertainty, and Community in a Laboratory Experience.通过基于模型的探究支持科学实践:学生在实验室体验中处理数据、不确定性和社区的视角。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Dec;20(4):ar59. doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-05-0128.
2
Authentic Inquiry through Modeling in Biology (AIM-Bio): An Introductory Laboratory Curriculum That Increases Undergraduates' Scientific Agency and Skills.生物学中的真实探究建模(AIM-Bio):一个提高本科生科学能动性和技能的入门实验室课程。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Dec;17(4):ar63. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-06-0090.
3
The Instructor's Role in a Model-Based Inquiry Laboratory: Characterizing Instructor Supports and Intentions in Teaching Authentic Scientific Practices.基于模型的探究性实验室中的教师角色:刻画教学中真实科学实践的教师支持和意图。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022 Mar;21(1):ar9. doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-07-0177.
4
Adding Authenticity to Inquiry in a First-Year, Research-Based, Biology Laboratory Course.在一门以研究为基础的生物学一年级实验室课程中增加探究的真实性。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Sep;18(3):ar38. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-07-0126.
5
Staff goals, challenges, and use of student inquiry in undergraduate bioscience teaching laboratories.本科生物科学教学实验室中学生探究的员工目标、挑战和使用。
FEBS Open Bio. 2023 Oct;13(10):1810-1830. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.13687. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
6
Is This Science? Students' Experiences of Failure Make a Research-Based Course Feel Authentic.这是科学吗?学生们的失败经历让一门基于研究的课程感觉真实。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Mar;20(1):ar10. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-07-0149.
7
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
8
Laboratory Courses with Guided-Inquiry Modules Improve Scientific Reasoning and Experimental Design Skills for the Least-Prepared Undergraduate Students.带引导式探究模块的实验室课程可提高准备最不充分的本科生的科学推理和实验设计技能。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Mar;18(1):ar2. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-08-0152.
9
Do We Need to Design Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences for Authenticity?我们是否需要为真实性设计基于课程的本科生研究经验?
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 winter;15(4). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-02-0102.
10
Known structure, unknown function: An inquiry-based undergraduate biochemistry laboratory course.已知结构,未知功能:一门基于探究的本科生物化学实验课程。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2015 Jul-Aug;43(4):245-62. doi: 10.1002/bmb.20873. Epub 2015 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating Student Noticing of Quantitative Reasoning in Introductory Biology Labs.探究学生在生物学入门实验室中对定量推理的关注情况。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2025 Mar 1;24(1):ar14. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-04-0124.
2
Exploring Student Sensemaking When Engaging with Anomalous Data.探索学生在处理异常数据时的意义建构。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Dec;23(4):ar63. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-08-0208.
3
How do Laboratory Teaching Assistants Learn to Support Science Practices? Exploring the Intersection Between Instructor Reasoning and Actions.

本文引用的文献

1
Meeting the Needs of A Changing Landscape: Advances and Challenges in Undergraduate Biology Education.满足不断变化的需求:本科生物学教育的进展与挑战。
Bull Math Biol. 2020 May 13;82(5):60. doi: 10.1007/s11538-020-00739-6.
2
Investigating Undergraduate Biology Students' Science Identity Production.调查本科生物学学生的科学身份形成。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Dec;18(4):ar50. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-10-0204.
3
Authentic Inquiry through Modeling in Biology (AIM-Bio): An Introductory Laboratory Curriculum That Increases Undergraduates' Scientific Agency and Skills.
实验室助教如何学习支持科学实践?探索教师推理与行动的交集。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Dec;23(4):ar56. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-03-0118.
4
Bee The CURE: Increasing Student Science Self-Efficacy, Science Identity, and Predictors of Scientific Civic Engagement in a Community College CURE.蜜蜂疗法:提高社区大学 CURE 中学生的科学自我效能感、科学认同感和科学公民参与的预测因素。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Dec;23(4):ar46. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-01-0015.
5
Postsecondary biology students' ways of participating in the critique and discussion of primary scientific literature.大学生物学专业学生参与主要科学文献的批判和讨论的方式。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023 Dec;22(4):ar47. doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-11-0218.
生物学中的真实探究建模(AIM-Bio):一个提高本科生科学能动性和技能的入门实验室课程。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Dec;17(4):ar63. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-06-0090.
4
Effects of Discovery, Iteration, and Collaboration in Laboratory Courses on Undergraduates' Research Career Intentions Fully Mediated by Student Ownership.实验室课程中的发现、迭代和协作对大学生科研职业意向的影响完全由学生自主性所中介。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Jun;17(2):ar20. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-07-0141.
5
An inclusive Research Education Community (iREC): Impact of the SEA-PHAGES program on research outcomes and student learning.包容的研究教育社区(iREC):SEA-PHAGES 计划对研究成果和学生学习的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Dec 19;114(51):13531-13536. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1718188115. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
6
Engaging Undergraduate Biology Students in Scientific Modeling: Analysis of Group Interactions, Sense-Making, and Justification.让大学生生物学专业的学生参与科学建模:分析小组互动、理解和论证。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Winter;16(4). doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-01-0023.
7
Early Engagement in Course-Based Research Increases Graduation Rates and Completion of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Degrees.早期参与基于课程的研究可提高毕业率以及科学、工程和数学学位的完成率。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Summer;15(2). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-03-0117.
8
Teaching Real Data Interpretation with Models (TRIM): Analysis of Student Dialogue in a Large-Enrollment Cell and Developmental Biology Course.利用模型进行真实数据解读教学(TRIM):对一门大规模招生的细胞与发育生物学课程中学生对话的分析
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Summer;15(2). doi: 10.1187/cbe.15-11-0239.
9
Modeling course-based undergraduate research experiences: an agenda for future research and evaluation.基于课程的本科研究经历建模:未来研究与评估议程
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015 Mar 2;14(1):es1. doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-10-0167.
10
Course-based undergraduate research experiences can make scientific research more inclusive.基于课程的本科研究经历可以使科学研究更具包容性。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2014 Winter;13(4):602-6. doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-06-0099.