Camilli Massimiliano, Amore Ludovica, Ballacci Federico, Iannaccone Giulia, Del Buono Marco Giuseppe, Giordano Federica, Graziani Francesca, Sanna Tommaso, Pedicino Daniela, Burzotta Francesco, Trani Carlo, Lanza Gaetano Antonio, Montone Rocco Antonio, Aspromonte Nadia, Lupi Laura, Adamo Marianna, Crea Filippo, Lombardo Antonella
Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Oct 28. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02562-8.
In acute heart failure (AHF) patients, non-invasive estimation of left ventricular filling pressures (LVFPs) appears crucial to guide management. Although poorly investigated, left atrial (LA) mechanics play a pivotal role in this setting. This report sought to assess the correlation of echocardiographic LA stiffness index with invasive LVFPs and its diagnostic accuracy as compared to other parameters used in clinical practice.
In this observational, prospective study, 104 patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome and signs/symptoms of AHF were enrolled. Available invasive estimation of LVFPs was required. Comprehensive echocardiography was performed for all patients, including LA reservoir strain (LARS). LA stiffness index was derived by speckle-tracking analysis and Tissue Doppler imaging as early diastolic transmitral inflow velocity/mitral annulus early diastolic velocity [E/e']/LARS.
Invasively measured LVFPs showed a strong correlation with LA stiffness index (Spearman ρ = 0.773, p < 0.0001), as well as with LARS and E/e'. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to demonstrate better accuracy performed by LA stiffness index than average E/e', LA volume or LARS alone, in predicting high LVFPs. Guideline-recommended assessment of diastolic function was finally compared to LARS and LA stiffness index performances in an independent population group; we were hence able to obtain a LA stiffness threshold of 0.48 with a positive predictive value of 91.7% and a negative predictive value of 88.9% in identifying patients with high LVFPs.
For the first time, diagnostic performance of LA stiffness index has been investigated in a heterogeneous AHF population, providing correlations with invasively measured LVFPs and comparisons with established diastolic function metrics.
在急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者中,左心室充盈压(LVFP)的非侵入性评估对于指导治疗似乎至关重要。尽管研究较少,但左心房(LA)力学在这种情况下起着关键作用。本报告旨在评估超声心动图左心房僵硬度指数与有创LVFP的相关性,以及与临床实践中使用的其他参数相比其诊断准确性。
在这项观察性前瞻性研究中,纳入了104例疑似急性冠状动脉综合征且有AHF体征/症状的患者。需要进行LVFP的有创评估。对所有患者进行了全面的超声心动图检查,包括左心房储备应变(LARS)。左心房僵硬度指数通过斑点追踪分析和组织多普勒成像得出,即舒张早期经二尖瓣流入速度/二尖瓣环舒张早期速度[E/e']/LARS。
有创测量的LVFP与左心房僵硬度指数(Spearman ρ = 0.773,p < 0.0001)以及LARS和E/e'均呈强相关。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析来证明,在预测高LVFP方面,左心房僵硬度指数比单独的平均E/e'、左心房容积或LARS具有更高的准确性。最终将指南推荐的舒张功能评估与独立人群组中的LARS和左心房僵硬度指数表现进行比较;因此,我们能够获得左心房僵硬度阈值为0.48,在识别高LVFP患者时,阳性预测值为91.7%,阴性预测值为88.9%。
首次在异质性AHF人群中研究了左心房僵硬度指数的诊断性能,提供了与有创测量的LVFP的相关性以及与既定舒张功能指标的比较。