Suppr超能文献

基于德尔菲法的手部创伤康复护理评价指标的构建探索。

Exploration of Establishing Evaluation Indicators for Hand Trauma Rehabilitation Nursing Based on Delphi Method.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Xihu Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, 310004 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Department of Orthopedics, 903 Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, 310000 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Ann Ital Chir. 2024;95(5):840-847. doi: 10.62713/aic.3627.

Abstract

AIM

This study aimed to develop an evaluation index system for hand surgery rehabilitation nursing using the Delphi method.

METHOD

A survey questionnaire on evaluation indicators for hand surgery rehabilitation nursing was developed, and 18 professionals including orthopedic surgeons, orthopedic nursing, and rehabilitation departments were selected. The survey was conducted using the letter method, and a database was established to screen the items, forming a hand surgery rehabilitation nursing evaluation scale. The expert's positive coefficient, authority coefficient, and coordination coefficient were analyzed, and the mean, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and weight coefficient were calculated. Based on the correlation assignment results, the Item-level Content Validity Index (I-CVI), Scale-level Content Validity Index (S-CVI), average S-CVI, Probability of random consistency (Pc), and corrected I-CVI Kendall's coefficient of concordance (K*) were determined.

RESULT

In the first round of expert inquiry, a total of 18 questionnaires were distributed, and 15 valid questionnaires were collected, with an effective response rate of 83.33%. In the second round, 15 questionnaires were distributed and 15 valid questionnaires were collected, with an effective response rate of 100%. The two rounds of expert evaluations yielded judgment scores of 0.91 and 0.95, with proficiency levels of 0.83 and 0.87 and authority coefficients of 0.87 and 0.91, respectively. The Kendall's W values for the two rounds were 0.313 and 0.224, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.01). After screening, 23 indicators were retained, with a coefficient of variation ranging from 0.072 to 0.166. Among the third-level indicators, 12 had an I-CVI of 1.00, 4 had an I-CVI of 0.93, and 7 had an I-CVI of 0.87. The overall S-CVI was 0.80, with an average S-CVI of 0.95. The K* values for the 23 indicators ranged from 0.8662 to 1.0000.

CONCLUSIONS

The evaluation index system for hand injury rehabilitation nursing based on the Delphi method is highly scientific, and is expected to be used to guide the clinical evaluation of hand injury rehabilitation nursing.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在运用德尔菲法构建手部外科康复护理评价指标体系。

方法

编制手部外科康复护理评价指标调查问卷,选取骨科医师、骨科护理、康复科等 18 名专家进行函询,建立数据库对条目进行筛选,形成手部外科康复护理评价量表。分析专家积极系数、权威系数、协调系数,计算均数、标准差、变异系数、权重系数。根据相关性赋值结果,确定条目水平内容效度指数(I-CVI)、量表水平内容效度指数(S-CVI)、平均 S-CVI、随机一致性概率(Pc)、校正后 I-CVI 肯德尔和谐系数(K*)。

结果

首轮专家咨询共发放问卷 18 份,回收有效问卷 15 份,有效回收率为 83.33%;第 2 轮发放问卷 15 份,回收有效问卷 15 份,有效回收率为 100.00%。两轮专家评价判断系数分别为 0.91、0.95,熟练程度系数分别为 0.83、0.87,权威系数分别为 0.87、0.91。两轮专家的 Kendall's W 值分别为 0.313、0.224,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。经筛选后保留 23 个指标,变异系数为 0.0720.166。三级指标中 12 个指标 I-CVI 值为 1.00,4 个指标 I-CVI 值为 0.93,7 个指标 I-CVI 值为 0.87;总体 S-CVI 为 0.80,平均 S-CVI 为 0.95;23 个指标 K*值范围为 0.86621.0000。

结论

基于德尔菲法构建的手部损伤康复护理评价指标体系科学性较高,有望用于指导手部损伤康复护理的临床评价。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验