• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨密度增强与压电内窦提升(PISE)技术在延迟种植体植入中的应用(一项随机对照临床试验)。

Osseodensification versus piezoelectric internal sinus elevation (PISE) technique in delayed implant placement (a randomized controlled clinical trial).

机构信息

AinShams University, Cairo, Egypt.

Periodontology and Oral diagnosis, Faculty of Dentistry, AinShams University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 28;24(1):1306. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04964-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-024-04964-6
PMID:39468538
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11520852/
Abstract

Transalveolar sinus elevation is a minimally invasive technique aimed at augmenting the vertical bone height in the posterior maxilla, facilitating successful implant placement in areas with insufficient bone volume. This study compares the efficacy of osseodensification and piezoelectric internal sinus elevation (PISE) techniques in delayed implant placement. The primary objective was to radiographically assess vertical bone gain and bone density, while secondary objectives included clinical assessment of primary implant stability and post-operative satisfaction of both patients and operators. The study population of a total of 16 patients was randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 underwent osseodensification sinus lift using sticky bone as a graft material, whereas Group 2 received PISE with the same graft material. Results indicated that the osseodensification technique led to greater bone gain, improved bone density, and shorter surgical duration. Additionally, osseodensification was associated with enhanced rapid healing and higher patient satisfaction. Conversely, the PISE technique demonstrated superior primary stability of implants on the day of surgery. These findings suggest that while both techniques are effective, osseodensification may offer advantages in terms of bone gain, density, and patient satisfaction, making it a reliable method for enhancing rapid healing in delayed implant placement. the study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov at 26 September 2023 and clinical trials ID is NCT06055127.

摘要

经牙槽嵴窦底提升术是一种微创技术,旨在增加上颌后牙区垂直骨高度,为骨量不足区域的种植体植入提供保障。本研究比较了骨密化和压电内窦提升(PISE)技术在延迟种植体植入中的效果。主要目的是通过影像学评估垂直骨增量和骨密度,次要目标包括评估主要种植体稳定性和患者及操作者对术后满意度的临床评估。共有 16 名患者的研究人群被随机分为两组。第 1 组采用粘性骨作为移植材料进行骨密化窦提升,第 2 组采用相同的移植材料进行 PISE。结果表明,骨密化技术导致了更大的骨增量、改善了骨密度,并缩短了手术时间。此外,骨密化与更快的愈合和更高的患者满意度相关。相反,PISE 技术在手术当天显示出更高的种植体初始稳定性。这些发现表明,虽然两种技术都有效,但骨密化在骨增量、密度和患者满意度方面可能具有优势,使其成为增强延迟种植体植入快速愈合的可靠方法。该研究于 2023 年 9 月 26 日在 clinicaltrials.gov 上注册,临床试验 ID 为 NCT06055127。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/b26e65d8a82a/12903_2024_4964_Fig23_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/51c7a74673ff/12903_2024_4964_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/3f6536776210/12903_2024_4964_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/5179b2e896e8/12903_2024_4964_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/c879a34eb202/12903_2024_4964_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/9166f35c745d/12903_2024_4964_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/f886d8858568/12903_2024_4964_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/09a34bd4413f/12903_2024_4964_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/3cd54eb60027/12903_2024_4964_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/69196d9a82ea/12903_2024_4964_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/78e7e0274308/12903_2024_4964_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/1b518211ee63/12903_2024_4964_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/11b30f6a966a/12903_2024_4964_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/5218e3e92e58/12903_2024_4964_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/df9140df4b62/12903_2024_4964_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/0a745bf9f4de/12903_2024_4964_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/a989a43129a9/12903_2024_4964_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/b75f57da707f/12903_2024_4964_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/47fa6a1c8d97/12903_2024_4964_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/da204da6e6fe/12903_2024_4964_Fig19_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/e3bba91d6224/12903_2024_4964_Fig20_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/d419fb35142f/12903_2024_4964_Fig21_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/a1d78e369814/12903_2024_4964_Fig22_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/b26e65d8a82a/12903_2024_4964_Fig23_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/51c7a74673ff/12903_2024_4964_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/3f6536776210/12903_2024_4964_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/5179b2e896e8/12903_2024_4964_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/c879a34eb202/12903_2024_4964_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/9166f35c745d/12903_2024_4964_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/f886d8858568/12903_2024_4964_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/09a34bd4413f/12903_2024_4964_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/3cd54eb60027/12903_2024_4964_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/69196d9a82ea/12903_2024_4964_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/78e7e0274308/12903_2024_4964_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/1b518211ee63/12903_2024_4964_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/11b30f6a966a/12903_2024_4964_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/5218e3e92e58/12903_2024_4964_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/df9140df4b62/12903_2024_4964_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/0a745bf9f4de/12903_2024_4964_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/a989a43129a9/12903_2024_4964_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/b75f57da707f/12903_2024_4964_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/47fa6a1c8d97/12903_2024_4964_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/da204da6e6fe/12903_2024_4964_Fig19_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/e3bba91d6224/12903_2024_4964_Fig20_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/d419fb35142f/12903_2024_4964_Fig21_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/a1d78e369814/12903_2024_4964_Fig22_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/11520852/b26e65d8a82a/12903_2024_4964_Fig23_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Osseodensification versus piezoelectric internal sinus elevation (PISE) technique in delayed implant placement (a randomized controlled clinical trial).骨密度增强与压电内窦提升(PISE)技术在延迟种植体植入中的应用(一项随机对照临床试验)。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 28;24(1):1306. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04964-6.
2
Antral membrane balloon technique versus Densah bur in crestal sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement: a randomized clinical trial.窦底黏膜球囊技术与 Densah 骨凿在同期种植体植入的牙槽嵴增高术中的应用:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 8;24(1):916. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04609-8.
3
Clinical evaluation of modified transalveolar sinus floor elevation and osteotome sinus floor elevation in posterior maxillae: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.改良经牙槽嵴窦底提升术与骨凿窦底提升术在上颌后牙区的临床评估:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Sep 14;19(1):489. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2879-x.
4
Comparison of Initial Implant Stability of Implants Placed Using Bicortical Fixation, Indirect Sinus Elevation, and Unicortical Fixation.使用双皮质固定、间接窦提升和单皮质固定植入种植体的初始种植体稳定性比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Mar-Apr;31(2):459-68. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4142.
5
Guided maxillary sinus floor elevation using deproteinized bovine bone versus graftless Schneiderian membrane elevation with simultaneous implant placement: Randomized clinical trial.引导上颌窦底提升术使用脱蛋白牛骨与无移植物施氏膜提升术同期种植体植入的随机临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Jun;20(3):424-433. doi: 10.1111/cid.12601. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
6
Piezoelectric surgery in maxillary sinus floor elevation with hydraulic pressure for xenograft and simultaneous implant placement.上颌窦底提升术中水压辅助下的压电骨切割同期植入种植体并用异种骨移植
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Nov;110(5):344-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 Sep 29.
7
Maxillary sinus floor augmentation surgery with autogenous bone grafts as ceiling: a pilot study and test of principle.以上颌窦底提升术联合自体骨移植作为上限:一项初步研究及原理验证。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Aug;15(4):550-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00409.x. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
8
Evaluation of crestal sinus floor elevations using versah burs with simultaneous implant placement, at residual bone height ≥ 2.0 _ < 6.0 mm. A prospective clinical study.在剩余骨高度≥2.0mm且<6.0mm时使用 Versah 车针同期植入评估颊侧窦底提升效果:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Jun;27(2):325-332. doi: 10.1007/s10006-022-01071-0. Epub 2022 May 14.
9
Osteotome sinus floor elevation with and without grafting: an animal study in Labrador dogs.骨凿法上颌窦底提升术(有无植骨):一项针对拉布拉多犬的动物研究
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Feb;26(2):197-203. doi: 10.1111/clr.12313. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
10
The use of a piezoelectric ultrasonic osteotome for internal sinus elevation: a retrospective analysis of clinical results.使用压电超声骨刀进行内窦提升:临床结果的回顾性分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Jul-Aug;27(4):920-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcrestal Maxillary Sinus Membrane Elevation using Osseodensification Compared with Alveolar Ridge Augmentation using the Lateral Window or Osteotome Technique: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.使用骨致密化技术进行经牙槽嵴上颌窦底提升与使用侧窗或骨凿技术进行牙槽嵴增高术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2025 Jun 30;16(2):e1. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2025.16201. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
2
Two-Stage Crestal Sinus Elevation Using Osseodensification Technique for Single Molar Restoration: A Case Report.使用骨致密化技术进行单颗磨牙修复的两阶段牙槽嵴窦提升术:病例报告
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2025 Mar 27;17:201-207. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S515234. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Radiographic Study of Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation Using Osseodensification Technique with Graft Material: A Pilot Study.使用植骨材料的骨致密化技术进行经牙槽嵴上颌窦底提升的影像学研究:一项初步研究。
Biomimetics (Basel). 2024 May 4;9(5):276. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9050276.
2
Application of sticky bone combined with concentrated growth factor (CGF) for horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation of anterior teeth: a randomized controlled clinical study.黏骨膜瓣联合浓缩生长因子(CGF)在门牙水平牙槽嵴增高中的应用:一项随机对照临床研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Apr 8;24(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04229-2.
3
Maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a review of current evidence on anatomical factors and a decision tree.
上颌窦底提升术:对解剖因素的当前证据的回顾和决策树。
Int J Oral Sci. 2023 Sep 15;15(1):41. doi: 10.1038/s41368-023-00248-x.
4
Different techniques in transalveolar maxillary sinus elevation: A literature review.经牙槽嵴上颌窦提升的不同技术:文献综述
J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent. 2021 Apr 6;13(1):35-42. doi: 10.34172/japid.2021.004. eCollection 2021.
5
Clinical Performance Comparing Titanium and Titanium-Zirconium or Zirconia Dental Implants: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.钛及钛锆或氧化锆牙科种植体的临床性能比较:随机对照试验的系统评价
Dent J (Basel). 2022 May 12;10(5):83. doi: 10.3390/dj10050083.
6
"Sticky Bone" Preparation Device: A Pilot Study on the Release of Cytokines and Growth Factors.“粘性骨”制备装置:细胞因子和生长因子释放的初步研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 Feb 16;15(4):1474. doi: 10.3390/ma15041474.
7
Comparative analysis between extra-short implants (≤6 mm) and 6 mm-longer implants: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial.超短种植体(≤6mm)与长于 6mm 的种植体的对比分析:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Aust Dent J. 2022 Sep;67(3):194-211. doi: 10.1111/adj.12900. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
8
Guided Bone Regeneration with Concentrated Growth Factor Enriched Bone Graft Matrix (Sticky Bone) vs. Bone-Shell Technique in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Retrospective Study.富含浓缩生长因子的骨移植基质(粘性骨)引导骨再生与骨壳技术在水平牙槽嵴增高术中的应用:一项回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 31;10(17):3953. doi: 10.3390/jcm10173953.
9
Effects of the Healing Chambers in Implant Macrogeometry Design in a Low-Density Bone Using Conventional and Undersized Drilling.愈合腔室在低密度骨中使用传统钻孔和过小尺寸钻孔进行种植体宏观几何设计中的作用。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2021 Jul 30;11(4):437-447. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_96_21. eCollection 2021 Jul-Aug.
10
Osseodensification enables bone healing chambers with improved low-density bone site primary stability: an in vivo study.骨密实化可提高低骨密度部位骨愈合室的初期稳定性:一项体内研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 29;11(1):15436. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94886-y.