Suppr超能文献

评估TikTok和YouTube上梅毒相关内容的质量与准确性:一项综合分析。

Assessing the Quality and Accuracy of Syphilis-Related Content on TikTok and YouTube: A Comprehensive Analysis.

作者信息

Alkhodair Rayan, Alfawzan Abdulrahman, Alharthi Sawsan A, AlOmair Abdulrahman, Alqerafi Abdulrahman, Alfaleh Abdullah

机构信息

Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City.

Dermatology and Dermatological Surgery Department, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Sex Transm Dis. 2025 Feb 1;52(2):81-86. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002090. Epub 2024 Oct 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sexually transmitted infections, including syphilis, pose a significant public health challenge. The advent of social media platforms has revolutionized health information dissemination, with YouTube and TikTok emerging as prominent sources. However, concerns persist regarding the reliability of syphilis-related content on these platforms. This study aimed to evaluate the quality and accuracy of syphilis-related content on TikTok and YouTube, using established tools such as DISCERN, Accuracy in Digital-health Instrument (ANDI), and Global Quality Scale (GQS).

METHODOLOGY

We conducted a thorough search on TikTok and YouTube on November 26, 2023, using the keyword "syphilis." Inclusion criteria comprised videos in English, less than 20 minutes in duration, and relevance to syphilis. Two dermatologists independently rated 98 eligible videos using DISCERN, ANDI, and GQS. Statistical analyses included χ2 tests, mean comparisons, and interclass correlation.

RESULTS

TikTok videos exhibited higher mean views (222,519 ± 412,746) compared with YouTube (127,527 ± 223,622). However, TikTok videos had lower mean GQS (2.3 ± 0.9), ANDI (2.19 ± 0.99), and DISCERN (28.7 ± 6.56) scores compared with YouTube (GQS: 2.9 ± 1.1, ANDI: 2.90 ± 0.97, DISCERN: 38.8 ± 9). Nonprofessional uploaders were 40.8% on TikTok, whereas the value was 53.1% on YouTube.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals disparities in the quality and accuracy of syphilis-related content on TikTok and YouTube. Despite higher popularity on TikTok, content quality, as assessed by DISCERN, ANDI, and GQS, was generally lower compared with YouTube. Targeted interventions are needed to improve the reliability of syphilis-related information on social media platforms.

摘要

背景

包括梅毒在内的性传播感染对公共卫生构成重大挑战。社交媒体平台的出现彻底改变了健康信息的传播方式,YouTube和TikTok成为了重要的信息来源。然而,人们对这些平台上与梅毒相关内容的可靠性仍存在担忧。本研究旨在使用DISCERN、数字健康工具准确性(ANDI)和全球质量量表(GQS)等既定工具,评估TikTok和YouTube上与梅毒相关内容的质量和准确性。

方法

2023年11月26日,我们使用关键词“梅毒”在TikTok和YouTube上进行了全面搜索。纳入标准包括英语视频、时长少于20分钟且与梅毒相关。两名皮肤科医生使用DISCERN、ANDI和GQS对98个符合条件的视频进行了独立评分。统计分析包括卡方检验、均值比较和组内相关分析。

结果

与YouTube(127,527±223,622)相比,TikTok视频的平均观看次数更高(222,519±412,746)。然而,与YouTube(GQS:2.9±1.1,ANDI:2.90±0.97,DISCERN:38.8±9)相比,TikTok视频的平均GQS(2.3±0.9)、ANDI(2.19±0.99)和DISCERN(28.7±6.56)得分更低。TikTok上非专业上传者的比例为40.8%,而YouTube上这一比例为53.1%。

结论

本研究揭示了TikTok和YouTube上与梅毒相关内容在质量和准确性上的差异。尽管TikTok上的内容更受欢迎,但根据DISCERN、ANDI和GQS评估,其内容质量总体上低于YouTube。需要有针对性的干预措施来提高社交媒体平台上与梅毒相关信息的可靠性。

相似文献

1
Assessing the Quality and Accuracy of Syphilis-Related Content on TikTok and YouTube: A Comprehensive Analysis.
Sex Transm Dis. 2025 Feb 1;52(2):81-86. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002090. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
2
Is the information about orthodontics on Youtube and TikTok reliable for the oral health of the public? A cross sectional comparative study.
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Oct;123(5):e349-e354. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
4
How much information regarding gingival enlargement can we get from TikTok and YouTube?
Spec Care Dentist. 2024 Jul-Aug;44(4):1115-1125. doi: 10.1111/scd.12957. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
5
TikTok and YouTube as sources of information on anal fissure: A comparative analysis.
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 3;10:1000338. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1000338. eCollection 2022.
6
YouTube and TikTok as sources of information on acute pancreatitis: a content and quality analysis.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 17;25(1):1446. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22738-9.
8
Quality of Information in Gallstone Disease Videos on TikTok: Cross-sectional Study.
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 8;25:e39162. doi: 10.2196/39162.
10
Female urinary incontinence on TikTok and YouTube: is online video content sufficient?
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Nov;34(11):2775-2781. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05607-0. Epub 2023 Jul 20.

本文引用的文献

1
2
Evaluation of the Young, Deadly, Syphilis Free multi-media campaign in remote Australia.
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 9;17(9):e0273658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273658. eCollection 2022.
3
Is the information about orthodontics on Youtube and TikTok reliable for the oral health of the public? A cross sectional comparative study.
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Oct;123(5):e349-e354. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
5
Accuracy and Quality of YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Vitiligo.
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2022 Jan 7;15:21-25. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S330015. eCollection 2022.
9
YouTube and Men's Health: A Review of the Current Literature.
Sex Med Rev. 2021 Apr;9(2):280-288. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2020.09.002. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
10
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review.
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 20;23(1):e17187. doi: 10.2196/17187.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验