Braund Heather, Hall Andrew K, Caners Kyla, Walker Melanie, Dagnone Damon, Sherbino Jonathan, Sibbald Matthew, Wang Bingxian, Howes Daniel, Day Andrew G, Wu William, Szulewski Adam
From the Faculty of Health Sciences (H.B.), Office of Professional Development and Educational Scholarship; Faculty of Education, School of Medicine, Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences (H.B.), Queen's University, Kingston; Department of Emergency Medicine (A.K.H.), University of Ottawa, Ottawa; Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (A.K.H.); Department of Emergency Medicine (K.C., D.D.), Queen's University; Departments of Emergency Medicine/Public Health Sciences (M.W.), Queen's University; Queen's Health Sciences (D.D.), Kingston; Department of Medicine (J.S.), McMaster Education Research, Innovation and Theory (MERIT) Program, McMaster University; Department of Medicine (M.S.), Centre for Simulation-Based Learning, McMaster University; Centre for Simulation-Based Learning (B.W.), McMaster University, Hamilton; Departments of Critical Care Medicine and Emergency Medicine (D.H.), Clinical Simulation Centre, Queen's University; Kingston General Hospital Research Institute (A.G.D.); Department of Family Medicine (W.W.), Queen's University; Departments of Emergency Medicine and Psychology (A.S.), Fellowship Program in Resuscitation and Reanimation; and Educational Scholarship Lead, Postgraduate Medical Education (A.S.), Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Simul Healthc. 2025 Jun 1;20(3):158-166. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000825. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
Debriefing after simulation facilitates reflective thinking and learning. Eye-tracking augmented debriefing (ETAD) may provide advantages over traditional debriefing (TD) by leveraging video replay with first-person perspective. This multisite randomized controlled trial compared the impact of ETAD with TD (without eye-tracking and without video) after simulation on 4 outcomes: (1) resident metacognitive awareness (the primary outcome), (2) cognitive load (CL) of residents and debriefers, (3) alignment of resident self-assessment and debriefer assessment scores, and (4) resident and debriefer perceptions of the debriefing experience.
Fifty-four emergency medicine residents from 2 institutions were randomized to the experimental (ETAD) or the control (TD) arm. Residents completed 2 simulation stations followed by debriefing. Before station 1 and after station 2, residents completed a Metacognition Awareness Inventory (MAI). After each station, debriefers and residents rated their CL and completed an assessment of performance. After the stations, residents were interviewed and debriefers participated in a focus group.
There were no statistically significant differences in mean MAI change, resident CL, or assessment alignment between residents and debriefers. Debriefer CL was lower in the experimental arm. Interviews identified 4 themes: (1) reflections related to debriefing approach, (2) eye-tracking as a metacognitive sensitizer, (3) translation of metacognition to practice, and (4) ETAD as a strategy to manage CL. Residents reported that eye tracking improved the specificity of feedback. Debriefers relied less on notes, leveraged video timestamps, appreciated the structure of the eye-tracking video, and found the video useful when debriefing poor performers.
There were no significant quantitative differences in MAI or resident CL scores; qualitative findings suggest that residents appreciated the benefits of the eye-tracking video review. Debriefers expended less CL and reported less perceived mental effort with the new technology. Future research should leverage longitudinal experimental designs to further understand the impact of eye-tracking facilitated debriefing.
模拟训练后的总结汇报有助于反思性思考和学习。眼动追踪增强型总结汇报(ETAD)通过利用第一人称视角的视频回放,可能比传统总结汇报(TD)具有优势。这项多中心随机对照试验比较了模拟训练后ETAD与TD(无眼动追踪且无视频)对4个结果的影响:(1)住院医师的元认知意识(主要结果),(2)住院医师和总结汇报者的认知负荷(CL),(3)住院医师自我评估与总结汇报者评估分数的一致性,以及(4)住院医师和总结汇报者对总结汇报体验的看法。
来自2个机构的54名急诊医学住院医师被随机分配到实验组(ETAD)或对照组(TD)。住院医师完成2个模拟站的训练,随后进行总结汇报。在第1站之前和第2站之后,住院医师完成一份元认知意识量表(MAI)。每个站之后,总结汇报者和住院医师对他们的CL进行评分,并完成一次表现评估。训练结束后,对住院医师进行访谈,总结汇报者参加焦点小组讨论。
住院医师的平均MAI变化、住院医师CL或住院医师与总结汇报者之间的评估一致性在统计学上没有显著差异。实验组中总结汇报者的CL较低。访谈确定了4个主题:(1)与总结汇报方法相关的反思,(2)眼动追踪作为一种元认知敏感剂,(3)元认知向实践的转化,以及(4)ETAD作为一种管理CL的策略。住院医师报告称眼动追踪提高了反馈的针对性。总结汇报者减少了对笔记的依赖,利用视频时间戳,欣赏眼动追踪视频的结构,并发现该视频在总结汇报表现不佳者时很有用。
MAI或住院医师CL分数没有显著的定量差异;定性研究结果表明住院医师认识到眼动追踪视频回顾的好处。总结汇报者使用新技术时的CL消耗较少,且感觉心理努力程度较低。未来的研究应利用纵向实验设计,以进一步了解眼动追踪辅助总结汇报的影响。