Department of Psychology, College of Science, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei 10617, Taiwan (R.O.C.).
Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, No. 7, Zhongshang S Rd., Taipei 10002, Taiwan (R.O.C.).
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2024 Nov 22;39(8):1342-1353. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acae089.
This study examined the relationship between culture and cognitive abilities by comparing WAIS-IV subtests, index scores, and Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ) scores across various age groups in the Taiwanese and U.S. populations.
The Taiwanese and U.S. versions of WAIS-IV are comprehensively compared, examining subtest items, psychometrics, and sample characteristics. Scaled scores are compared by extracting raw scores with a scaled score of 10 from each subtest scale in the Taiwanese version and applying U.S. age norms to acquire U.S. scaled scores.
Despite the mean FSIQ score closely aligning with the U.S. sample, notable discrepancies are evident in the Taiwanese Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI) score, potentially influenced by cultural fairness of the tests. Significant variations are observed among age cohorts in the Taiwanese sample, with younger individuals excelling in Processing Speed Index, Working Memory Index, Perceptual Reasoning Index, and FSIQ, while maintaining comparable VCI scores to their U.S. counterparts. Conversely, older cohorts demonstrate lower performance across various domains, except for visuospatial reasoning and organizational skills, compared to their U.S. counterparts. These subtest variations robustly correlate with educational disparities between the Taiwanese and U.S. samples.
Despite the similarity in factor structures between the Taiwanese and U.S. versions of WAIS-IV, this study reveals cultural bias in both verbal and non-verbal subtests. The study highlights the intricate interplay among cognitive processing styles, cultural influences, and educational factors contributing to performance disparities.
本研究通过比较台湾和美国人群在不同年龄组的韦氏智力测验第四版(WAIS-IV)子测验、指数得分和全量表智商(FSIQ)得分,考察了文化与认知能力之间的关系。
全面比较了台湾和美国版的 WAIS-IV,考察了子测验项目、心理计量学和样本特征。通过从台湾版的每个子测验量表中提取原始分数,并应用美国年龄常模获得美国量表分数,对量表分数进行了比较。
尽管 FSIQ 平均分与美国样本密切一致,但台湾的言语理解指数(VCI)得分存在明显差异,这可能受到测试的文化公平性的影响。在台湾样本中,不同年龄组之间存在显著差异,年轻个体在加工速度指数、工作记忆指数、知觉推理指数和 FSIQ 方面表现出色,而与美国同龄人相比,VCI 得分保持相当。相比之下,与美国同龄人相比,年长组在各个领域的表现都较低,除了视觉空间推理和组织技能。这些子测验的差异与台湾和美国样本之间的教育差距密切相关。
尽管台湾和美国版的 WAIS-IV 在因子结构上相似,但本研究揭示了言语和非言语子测验中的文化偏见。本研究强调了认知加工风格、文化影响和教育因素之间的复杂相互作用,这些因素导致了表现差异。