Miranda de Aquino Miranda Jéssica, Sousa de Andrade Pedro Henrique, Henrique Maria Eduarda Salum Aveiro, Henrique de Souza Fonseca Bruno, Bazan Rodrigo, Sande de Souza Luciane Aparecida Pascucci, José Luvizutto Gustavo
Department of Applied Physical Therapy, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Department of Neurology, Psychology and Psychiatry, São Paulo State University, Botucatu Medical School, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2025 May;32(4):438-457. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2024.2411878. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has a priming effect on post- stroke motor rehabilitation.
We verified whether tDCS combined with task-specific training was superior to nonintervention, task-specific training, or simulated intervention in improving spatio-temporal gait parameters and functional mobility in stroke patients.
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and LILACS for articles published until May 2024, using terms related to stroke, tDCS, and task-specific training. The risk of bias was assessed using the PEDro scale. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology was used to classify the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model.
A total of 1,685 studies were identified, of which 18 were included in the qualitative analysis. Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis; all outcomes were classified as "very low quality." Improvements in walking speed only were associated with tDCS combined with task-specific training (mean difference [MD], 0.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.04, 0.07; < 0.001; I = 0%). There were no differences in other spatio-temporal gait parameters or functional mobility.
This systematic review provides low-quality evidence that tDCS, in combination with task-specific training, increases speed in individuals after stroke. Both interventions, tDCS and task-specific training, are inexpensive and easy to implement; therefore, the mean estimate may be considered clinically worthwhile, although the CIs spans both clinically trivial and worthwhile effects.
International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; number CRD42023396021).
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对中风后运动康复具有启动效应。
我们验证了tDCS联合特定任务训练在改善中风患者时空步态参数和功能移动性方面是否优于无干预、特定任务训练或模拟干预。
我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Scopus、Cochrane Central、Web of Science和LILACS,查找截至2024年5月发表的文章,使用与中风、tDCS和特定任务训练相关的术语。使用PEDro量表评估偏倚风险。采用推荐分级、评估、制定和评价方法对每个结局的证据确定性进行分类。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。
共识别出1685项研究,其中18项纳入定性分析。7项研究纳入荟萃分析;所有结局均被归类为“极低质量”。仅步行速度的改善与tDCS联合特定任务训练相关(平均差[MD],0.06;95%置信区间[CI]:0.04,0.07;P < 0.001;I² = 0%)。其他时空步态参数或功能移动性无差异。
本系统评价提供了低质量证据,表明tDCS联合特定任务训练可提高中风后个体的速度。tDCS和特定任务训练这两种干预措施均价格低廉且易于实施;因此,尽管置信区间涵盖了临床上微不足道和有价值的效应,但平均估计值可能被认为在临床上是值得的。
国际系统评价前瞻性注册库(PROSPERO;编号CRD42023396021)。