de Bruijn Marcel A N, Boersma Emily Z, van Silfhout Lysanne, van Ginkel Laura A, Tromp Tjarda N, van de Krol Erik, Edwards Michael J R, Stirler Vincent M A, Hermans Erik
Department of Trauma Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands ; and.
Military Health Organisation, Ministry of Defence, Kromhout Kazerne, Utrecht, The Netherlands .
J Orthop Trauma. 2025 Feb 1;39(2):82-89. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002930.
Implementation of 1 week of cast immobilization followed by gradually increasing wrist mobilization for non- or minimally displaced distal radius fracture (DRF) and comparison of the functional outcomes and pain scores with the usual care (3-5 weeks of cast immobilization).
A randomized stepped wedge cluster design, prospective cohort.
Academic and peripheral hospitals in levels 1, 2, and 3 trauma centers.
All patients between 18 and 85 years old with an isolated non- or minimally and nonreduced DRF were eligible for inclusion. Participating hospitals were randomized to transition from usual care (3-5 weeks of cast immobilization) to 1 week of cast immobilization, following the stepped wedge design.
Patient characteristics, secondary dislocation, surgical treatment, visual analog scale, Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference, Pain Catastrophizing Scale 4, and patient satisfaction were compared between control and intervention group at weeks 1, 3-5, 6, months 3, 6, and 12. A difference around 11 points on the PRWE scale was considered clinically significant.
Four hundred two patients were included (control n = 197 vs. intervention n = 205, 267/135, female/male). There were no differences in age (53.7 ± 18.6 vs. 53.3 ± 19.5, P = 0.27), sex (66% vs. 67% female, P = 0.44), dominant hand fractured (44% vs. 53%, P = 0.39), and type of fracture (39% vs. 41% extra-articular, P = 0.44). After 6 weeks, the PRWE score showed no clinically significant differences (-4.5 [confidence interval -12.9 to 4.02], P = 0.30). No significant differences were observed for function, pain scores, and patient satisfaction between groups (all P > 0.05). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in secondary dislocation rate (control 1.5% vs. intervention 1.0%, P = 0.32) and operation rate (control 1.5% vs. 1.5% intervention, P = 0.92).
This study compared 1 week of cast immobilization followed by gradually increasing wrist mobilization to the usual care of 3-5 weeks for nonreduced DRF. No clinically significant differences in function, pain scores, patient satisfaction, secondary dislocation, and operations were observed. Therefore, 1 week of plaster immobilization can be safely recommended for the non- or minimally displaced and nonreduced DRF treatment.
Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
对无移位或轻度移位的桡骨远端骨折(DRF)实施1周的石膏固定,随后逐渐增加腕关节活动度,并将功能结局和疼痛评分与常规治疗(3 - 5周的石膏固定)进行比较。
随机阶梯楔形整群设计,前瞻性队列研究。
1、2、3级创伤中心的学术医院和周边医院。
所有年龄在18至85岁之间、孤立的无移位或轻度移位且未复位的DRF患者均符合纳入标准。参与研究的医院按照阶梯楔形设计随机从常规治疗(3 - 5周的石膏固定)过渡到1周的石膏固定。
在第1、3 - 5、6周、3个月、6个月和12个月时,比较对照组和干预组的患者特征、二次脱位、手术治疗情况、视觉模拟量表、患者腕关节评估量表(PRWE)、患者报告结局测量信息系统疼痛干扰量表、疼痛灾难化量表4以及患者满意度。PRWE量表上相差约11分被认为具有临床意义。
共纳入402例患者(对照组n = 197 vs. 干预组n = 205,女性/男性为267/135)。年龄(53.7 ± 18.6 vs. 53.3 ± 19.5,P = 0.27)、性别(女性分别为66% vs. 67%,P = 0.44)、优势手骨折情况(44% vs. 53%,P = 0.39)以及骨折类型(关节外骨折分别为39% vs. 41%,P = 0.44)方面均无差异。6周后,PRWE评分无临床显著差异(-4.5[置信区间-12.9至4.02],P = 0.30)。两组在功能、疼痛评分和患者满意度方面均未观察到显著差异(所有P > 0.05)。此外,二次脱位率(对照组1.5% vs. 干预组1.0%,P = 0.32)和手术率(对照组1.5% vs. 干预组1.5%,P = 0.92)也无显著差异。
本研究将1周的石膏固定随后逐渐增加腕关节活动度与未复位DRF的常规3 - 5周治疗进行了比较。在功能、疼痛评分、患者满意度、二次脱位和手术方面未观察到临床显著差异。因此,对于无移位或轻度移位且未复位的DRF治疗,可安全推荐1周的石膏固定。
治疗性II级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。