O'Leary Christine, Pittet Laure F, Beaumont Rachael, Constable Laura, Daley Andrew, Hodge Isabelle, Jacobs Susan E, King Arrabella, Tan Catherine, Curtis Nigel, Gwee Amanda
Department of General Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Infectious Diseases Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Arch Dis Child. 2025 Feb 19;110(3):209-215. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-327628.
The gold standard for diagnosis of meningitis is the isolation of a pathogen from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by culture or PCR. However, treatment is routinely commenced based on CSF findings prior to microbiological results. This study determined the predictive value of CSF parameters for diagnosing bacterial and viral meningitis in young infants.
Multicentre retrospective (2010-2020) cohort study of 1088 CSF results from infants aged 0-90 days. The predictive value of CSF parameters (white blood cell count (WCC), neutrophil, protein, glucose) was evaluated in 538 meningitis cases (39 bacterial, 499 viral) compared with controls with negative CSF microbiological testing and no prior antibiotics.
For bacterial meningitis, the sensitivity of the commonly used CSF WCC cut-off of 20×10/L for neonates, 15×10/L for infants 1-2 months old and 5×10/L for infants 2-3 months old was 89%, 91% and 86% and the specificity was 78%, 77% and 61%, respectively. CSF protein levels ≥1 g/L in neonates and ≥0.8 g/L in infants aged 1-3 month, or CSF neutrophils ≥2×10/L, independently increased the likelihood of bacterial meningitis (positive likelihood ratios ≥5 and ≥3, respectively). 3 of 39 cases of bacterial meningitis would have been missed using the commonly used WCC cut-offs alone. However, two would have been identified using CSF protein and neutrophil thresholds. All CSF parameters were poor at identifying viral meningitis.
A single CSF parameter cannot reliably diagnose bacterial meningitis. For identification of bacterial meningitis, elevation of CSF WCC, neutrophil count or protein levels above threshold values improves accuracy of diagnosis.
脑膜炎诊断的金标准是通过培养或聚合酶链反应(PCR)从脑脊液(CSF)中分离出病原体。然而,在微生物学结果出来之前,通常会根据脑脊液检查结果开始治疗。本研究确定了脑脊液参数对诊断婴幼儿细菌性和病毒性脑膜炎的预测价值。
对1088例0至90日龄婴儿的脑脊液结果进行多中心回顾性(2010 - 2020年)队列研究。在538例脑膜炎病例(39例细菌性,499例病毒性)中评估脑脊液参数(白细胞计数(WCC)、中性粒细胞、蛋白质、葡萄糖)的预测价值,并与脑脊液微生物学检测阴性且未使用过抗生素的对照组进行比较。
对于细菌性脑膜炎,常用的脑脊液白细胞计数临界值,新生儿为20×10⁹/L,1至2个月大的婴儿为15×10⁹/L,2至3个月大的婴儿为5×10⁹/L,其敏感性分别为89%、91%和86%,特异性分别为78%、77%和61%。新生儿脑脊液蛋白水平≥1g/L,1至3个月大的婴儿≥0.8g/L,或脑脊液中性粒细胞≥2×10⁹/L,独立增加了细菌性脑膜炎的可能性(阳性似然比分别≥5和≥3)。仅使用常用的白细胞计数临界值会漏诊39例细菌性脑膜炎病例中的3例。然而,使用脑脊液蛋白和中性粒细胞阈值可识别出其中2例。所有脑脊液参数在识别病毒性脑膜炎方面表现不佳。
单一的脑脊液参数不能可靠地诊断细菌性脑膜炎。为了识别细菌性脑膜炎,脑脊液白细胞计数、中性粒细胞计数或蛋白水平高于阈值可提高诊断准确性。