Fang M, Liu Y C, Zhong S, Li D M, Yang T, Bai S Z
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Xi'an710032, China.
Digital Dental Center, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Xi'an710032, China.
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Nov 9;59(11):1120-1125. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20240712-00270.
To evaluate the effect of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) periodontal splints and splints made from other materials under static loading on stress distributions in periodontal tissues, cement layer, and splints themselves. A finite element model based on cone-beam CT imaging data of a 25-year-old male patient (treated at the Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University in October 2021 for a cracked maxillary molar) with a healthy and intact mandibular dentition and periodontal health was constructed. The finite element model included anterior mandible dentition, mandibular bone model without bone resorption (WBR group), a periodontally compromised mandible model (control group), and three types of periodontal splints: a PEEK periodontal splint (0.7 mm thick, Young's modulus: 4.1 MPa), a fiber-reinforced resin (FRC) splint (1.0 mm thick, Young's modulus: 37.0 MPa), and a titanium splint (1.2 mm thick, Young's modulus: 110.0 MPa). The bone resorption models fixed with different periodontal splints constituted the experimental groups (PEEK group, FRC group and titanium group). Loading of 100 N was applied on the midpoint of the incisal edge of tooth 41. The direction was set at 0°, which was parallel to the long axis of the tooth and downward. The buccal to lingual and downward angles were 30°and 60°, respectively, perpendicular to the long axis of the tooth and 90° to the lingual side. The finite element analysis software was utilized to analyze the stress distribution characteristics of the periodontal tissues, adhesive layer, and the splint itself in the anterior mandibular teeth among the different group. Under the different loading simulation, in the control group, the maximal von Mises stresses of periodontal ligament and bone were 15.7-50.2 MPa and 38.8-130.3 MPa, respectively, and in the WBR group, the maximal von Mises stresses of periodontal ligament and bone were 3.6-6.4 MPa and 16.5-42.7 MPa, respectively. Under the same loading conditions, the magnitude of maximal von Mises stresses in periodontal tissues in the PEEK group was 4.6-6.2 MPa, and the magnitude of stresses in the periodontal ligament of 41 teeth in the WBR group was similar to that in the PEEK group, but higher than that in the FRC and titanium groups. The maximal von Mises stresses of each group is primarily distributed in the periodontal ligament and alveolar bone at the cervical area of the tooth. The higher the elastic modulus of the splint, the higher its own maximal von Mises stresses, and the smaller the maximal principal stresses transmitted to the adhesive layer. In the PEEK group and titanium group, the stress distribution area in the adhesive layer and the splint was near the splint connection adjacent to tooth 41. Periodontal splints fabricated from three types of materials, are effective in distributing stress within the periodontal tissues of the abutment teeth. Compared to FRC and titanium group, the higher PEEK splint stress value was obtained, and the smaller the stress value was transmitted to its adhesive layer.
为评估聚醚醚酮(PEEK)牙周夹板及其他材料制成的夹板在静态加载下对牙周组织、粘结层及夹板本身应力分布的影响。基于一名25岁男性患者(2021年10月在第四军医大学口腔医学院修复科因上颌磨牙劈裂接受治疗)的锥束CT成像数据构建有限元模型,该患者下颌牙列健康完整且牙周健康。有限元模型包括下颌前牙牙列、无骨吸收的下颌骨模型(WBR组)、牙周受损的下颌骨模型(对照组)以及三种类型的牙周夹板:PEEK牙周夹板(厚0.7mm,杨氏模量:4.1MPa)、纤维增强树脂(FRC)夹板(厚1.0mm,杨氏模量:37.0MPa)和钛夹板(厚1.2mm,杨氏模量:110.0MPa)。用不同牙周夹板固定的骨吸收模型构成实验组(PEEK组、FRC组和钛组)。在41号牙切缘中点施加100N的载荷。方向设定为0°,即平行于牙长轴并向下。颊舌向和向下角度分别为30°和60°,垂直于牙长轴且与舌侧成90°。利用有限元分析软件分析不同组下颌前牙牙周组织、粘结层及夹板本身的应力分布特征。在不同加载模拟下,对照组中牙周膜和骨的最大von Mises应力分别为15.7 - 50.2MPa和38.8 - 130.3MPa,WBR组中牙周膜和骨的最大von Mises应力分别为3.6 - 6.4MPa和16.5 - 42.7MPa。在相同加载条件下,PEEK组牙周组织中最大von Mises应力大小为4.6 - 6.2MPa,WBR组中41号牙牙周膜中的应力大小与PEEK组相似,但高于FRC组和钛组。每组的最大von Mises应力主要分布在牙颈部的牙周膜和牙槽骨。夹板的弹性模量越高,其自身的最大von Mises应力越高,传递至粘结层的最大主应力越小。在PEEK组和钛组中,粘结层和夹板中的应力分布区域靠近与41号牙相邻的夹板连接处。三种材料制成的牙周夹板在基牙牙周组织内有效分散应力。与FRC组和钛组相比,PEEK夹板获得的应力值更高,传递至其粘结层的应力值更小。