Chou Yi-Ju, Chang Chia-Lun, Tsai Yao-Chou
Division of Urology, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei, Taiwan.
School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2025 Feb 21;74:34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.02.002. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Indocyanine green-guided sentinel lymph node dissection (ICG-SLND) has demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy for lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer. This study aims to perform a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ICG-SLND at both the per-patient and the per-node level.
We conducted a literature search on PubMed and Embase for relevant studies published up to June 2024. The inclusion criteria were prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, ICG-SLND, and subsequent extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). Data were extracted to calculate the pooled sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) at both the per-patient and the per-node level.
Our search identified 13 relevant studies, comprising a total of 748 patients. All studies were assessed as having a low risk of bias. At the per-patient level, the pooled sensitivity of ICG-SLND for diagnosing lymph node metastasis was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.92), with a pooled NPV of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90-0.98). At the per-node level, the pooled sensitivity was 0.53 (95% CI: 0.45-0.62), and the pooled NPV was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97-0.98). Significant heterogeneity was observed in the per-node level sensitivity, NPV, and sentinel lymph node detection rate outcomes. The primary limitation is the lack of investigation into the impact of ICG-SLND on survival outcomes.
The per-patient level sensitivity of ICG-SLND for diagnosing lymph node metastases is 87%, which better represents the diagnostic accuracy of ICG-SLND than the per-node level sensitivity. As ePLND has demonstrated a positive impact on oncologic outcomes, ICG-SLND cannot yet be recommended as the standard lymph node dissection approach. The significant heterogeneity observed in the pooled results highlights the need for further research to determine the optimal injection methods.
Indocyanine green-guided sentinel lymph node dissection (ICG-SLND) has demonstrated favorable performance for diagnosing lymph node metastases in prostate cancer. The per-patient level sensitivity of ICG-SLND provides better diagnostic performance than its per-node level sensitivity. However, further research is needed for ICG-SLND to be recommended as the standard approach for lymph node dissection.
吲哚菁绿引导下的前哨淋巴结清扫术(ICG-SLND)已被证明在前列腺癌淋巴结转移诊断中具有良好的准确性。本研究旨在对ICG-SLND在患者层面和淋巴结层面的诊断准确性进行荟萃分析。
我们在PubMed和Embase上检索截至2024年6月发表的相关研究。纳入标准为接受根治性前列腺切除术、ICG-SLND及随后扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术(ePLND)的前列腺癌患者。提取数据以计算患者层面和淋巴结层面的合并敏感性及阴性预测值(NPV)。
我们的检索共识别出13项相关研究,涉及748例患者。所有研究均被评估为偏倚风险较低。在患者层面,ICG-SLND诊断淋巴结转移的合并敏感性为0.87(95%置信区间[CI]:0.77 - 0.92),合并NPV为0.95(95%CI:0.90 - 0.98)。在淋巴结层面,合并敏感性为0.53(95%CI:0.45 - 0.62),合并NPV为0.98(95%CI:0.97 - 0.98)。在淋巴结层面的敏感性、NPV和前哨淋巴结检出率结果中观察到显著异质性。主要局限性是缺乏对ICG-SLND对生存结局影响的研究。
ICG-SLND在患者层面诊断淋巴结转移的敏感性为87%,与淋巴结层面敏感性相比,能更好地代表ICG-SLND的诊断准确性。由于ePLND已被证明对肿瘤学结局有积极影响,目前尚不能推荐ICG-SLND作为标准淋巴结清扫方法。汇总结果中观察到的显著异质性凸显了进一步研究以确定最佳注射方法的必要性。
吲哚菁绿引导下的前哨淋巴结清扫术(ICG-SLND)在前列腺癌淋巴结转移诊断中表现良好。ICG-SLND在患者层面的敏感性比其在淋巴结层面的敏感性具有更好的诊断性能。然而,ICG-SLND要被推荐为淋巴结清扫的标准方法还需要进一步研究。