• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过诱导突变开发的耐草甘膦鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum L.)突变体的田间和生化评价。

Field and biochemical evaluation of glyphosate tolerant chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) mutants developed through induced mutagenesis.

机构信息

Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology College, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (NIAB-C, PIEAS), Jhang Road, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.

出版信息

BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Oct 30;24(1):1028. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05733-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12870-024-05733-x
PMID:39472786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11523782/
Abstract

Weed control in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is challenging due to narrow genetic base of available germplasm and limited herbicide options. In this view, present research was focused on induced mutagenesis in chickpea for development of herbicide (glyphosate) tolerant mutants and subsequent screening under field conditions. Further, objective was to analyze the defence response and biochemical adjustments in selected glyphosate tolerant chickpea mutants. Initially, 376 chickpea mutants (M populations developed through EMS and gamma rays) were screened for glyphosate tolerance under filed conditions and scored on a 1 to 5 scale based on plant injury related traits. Among tested mutants, 40 were found highly tolerant (score = 5), 32 as tolerant (score = 4) and 20 as highly sensitive (score = 1) to glyphosate. Chickpea mutants with variable glyphosate tolerance also differed significantly (Tukey test, p < 0.05) in leaf biochemical profiles. For instant, lowest total oxidant status (4175.µM/g f. wt.) was detected in glyphosate tolerant mutant developed from desi chickpea genotype "D3009" using 0.3% EMS and in highly tolerant mutant (1775. µM/g f. wt.) developed from kabuli genotype "K709" using 0.2% EMS. In general, highly tolerant chickpea mutants exhibited highest antioxidant potential (SOD, POD, CAT, TAC) that contributed in glyphosate tolerance. Desi i.e. D1M1HT-2 and Kabuli i.e. KM3HT-2 type mutants with highest seed yield had maximum catalase activity (4200 Units/g f. wt and 540 Units/g f. wt.). Mutants developed from desi type genotypes were comparably superior to mutants derive from Kabuli in terms of herbicide tolerance.

摘要

由于现有种质资源遗传基础狭窄和除草剂选择有限,鹰嘴豆中的杂草控制具有挑战性。有鉴于此,本研究专注于鹰嘴豆的诱导突变,以开发对除草剂(草甘膦)具有耐受性的突变体,并随后在田间条件下进行筛选。此外,本研究的目的是分析选定的对草甘膦具有耐受性的鹰嘴豆突变体的防御反应和生化调节。最初,在田间条件下对 376 个鹰嘴豆突变体(通过 EMS 和伽马射线开发的 M 群体)进行了草甘膦耐受性筛选,并根据与植物损伤相关的特征对其进行了 1 到 5 的评分。在测试的突变体中,有 40 个被认为对草甘膦高度耐受(评分=5),32 个被认为耐受(评分=4),20 个对草甘膦高度敏感(评分=1)。具有不同草甘膦耐受性的鹰嘴豆突变体在叶片生化特征上也存在显著差异(Tukey 检验,p<0.05)。例如,用 0.3%EMS 从印度鹰嘴豆品种“D3009”中开发的耐草甘膦突变体的总氧化剂状态最低(4175.µM/g f.wt.),而用 0.2%EMS 从卡布里鹰嘴豆品种“K709”中开发的高度耐受突变体(1775.µM/g f.wt.)的总氧化剂状态最低。一般来说,高度耐受的鹰嘴豆突变体表现出最高的抗氧化潜力(SOD、POD、CAT、TAC),这有助于其对草甘膦的耐受性。具有最高种子产量的 Desi 型即 D1M1HT-2 和 Kabuli 型即 KM3HT-2 突变体具有最高的过氧化氢酶活性(4200 Units/g f.wt.和 540 Units/g f.wt.)。在耐除草剂方面,源自 Desi 型基因型的突变体与源自 Kabuli 的突变体相比具有相当的优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/eff2ce3028e9/12870_2024_5733_Fig25_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/5873790a955c/12870_2024_5733_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/a40feaa0bc75/12870_2024_5733_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/102d597346c4/12870_2024_5733_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/39a7a0c784bb/12870_2024_5733_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/b73eb10201f0/12870_2024_5733_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/b10fc863caad/12870_2024_5733_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/b7a47ac1fecb/12870_2024_5733_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/b7a62b64561d/12870_2024_5733_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/159d0ddc9e9e/12870_2024_5733_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/79a083f19ea8/12870_2024_5733_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/d2c4818378d5/12870_2024_5733_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/4866bc565bf0/12870_2024_5733_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/78121e7e0af9/12870_2024_5733_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/8e28e1c7c5f3/12870_2024_5733_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/6a0a3f4a1329/12870_2024_5733_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/f9eff4f28103/12870_2024_5733_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/a7eaab44e73c/12870_2024_5733_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/8ce3f6d1cc6c/12870_2024_5733_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/88309ff0bda8/12870_2024_5733_Fig19_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/63d8a8f18a22/12870_2024_5733_Fig20_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/1cf179102714/12870_2024_5733_Fig21_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/2bf885973b55/12870_2024_5733_Fig22_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/eddf961dd95a/12870_2024_5733_Fig23_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/8550afeb290a/12870_2024_5733_Fig24_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/eff2ce3028e9/12870_2024_5733_Fig25_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/5873790a955c/12870_2024_5733_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/a40feaa0bc75/12870_2024_5733_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/102d597346c4/12870_2024_5733_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/39a7a0c784bb/12870_2024_5733_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/b73eb10201f0/12870_2024_5733_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/b10fc863caad/12870_2024_5733_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/b7a47ac1fecb/12870_2024_5733_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/b7a62b64561d/12870_2024_5733_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/159d0ddc9e9e/12870_2024_5733_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/79a083f19ea8/12870_2024_5733_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/d2c4818378d5/12870_2024_5733_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/4866bc565bf0/12870_2024_5733_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/78121e7e0af9/12870_2024_5733_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/8e28e1c7c5f3/12870_2024_5733_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/6a0a3f4a1329/12870_2024_5733_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/f9eff4f28103/12870_2024_5733_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/a7eaab44e73c/12870_2024_5733_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/8ce3f6d1cc6c/12870_2024_5733_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/88309ff0bda8/12870_2024_5733_Fig19_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/63d8a8f18a22/12870_2024_5733_Fig20_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/1cf179102714/12870_2024_5733_Fig21_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/2bf885973b55/12870_2024_5733_Fig22_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/eddf961dd95a/12870_2024_5733_Fig23_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/8550afeb290a/12870_2024_5733_Fig24_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb1/11523782/eff2ce3028e9/12870_2024_5733_Fig25_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Field and biochemical evaluation of glyphosate tolerant chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) mutants developed through induced mutagenesis.通过诱导突变开发的耐草甘膦鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum L.)突变体的田间和生化评价。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Oct 30;24(1):1028. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05733-x.
2
Biochemical Profiling for Antioxidant and Therapeutic Potential of Pakistani Chickpea ( L.) Genetic Resource.巴基斯坦鹰嘴豆(L.)遗传资源抗氧化及治疗潜力的生化分析
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Apr 13;12:663623. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.663623. eCollection 2021.
3
Genetic characterization of the acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS) gene responsible for resistance to imidazolinone in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).乙酰羟酸合酶(AHAS)基因介导的鹰嘴豆对咪唑啉酮类除草剂抗性的遗传特征。
Theor Appl Genet. 2014 Jul;127(7):1583-91. doi: 10.1007/s00122-014-2320-0. Epub 2014 May 13.
4
Differential response of chickpea genotypes to isoxaflutole.鹰嘴豆基因型对异恶唑草酮的差异响应。
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2006;71(3 Pt A):733-42.
5
Demystifying the nutritional and anti-nutritional genetic divergence of Pakistani chickpea ( L.) genetic resource via multivariate approaches.通过多变量方法揭开巴基斯坦鹰嘴豆(L.)遗传资源的营养和抗营养遗传差异之谜。
Front Nutr. 2024 Oct 4;11:1407096. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1407096. eCollection 2024.
6
Proline improves copper tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum).脯氨酸提高鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum)对铜的耐受性。
Protoplasma. 2010 Sep;245(1-4):173-81. doi: 10.1007/s00709-010-0178-9. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
7
Comparative analysis of kabuli chickpea transcriptome with desi and wild chickpea provides a rich resource for development of functional markers.卡布拉鹰嘴豆转录组与德西和野生鹰嘴豆的比较分析为功能标记的开发提供了丰富的资源。
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52443. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052443. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
8
Effect of cold stress on polyamine metabolism and antioxidant responses in chickpea.冷应激对鹰嘴豆多胺代谢和抗氧化响应的影响。
J Plant Physiol. 2021 Mar-Apr;258-259:153387. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2021.153387. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
9
A comparative metabolomic study on desi and kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes under rainfed and irrigated field conditions.在雨养和灌溉田间条件下对印度圆粒和克什米尔圆粒鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum L.)基因型进行比较代谢组学研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 18;10(1):13919. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70963-6.
10
Field screening and identification of biochemical indices of pod borer () resistance in chickpea mutants.鹰嘴豆突变体对豆荚螟抗性生化指标的田间筛选与鉴定
Front Plant Sci. 2024 May 10;15:1335158. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1335158. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Managing Weed-Crop Interactions Enhances Chickpea ( L.) Chemical Components.管理杂草与作物的相互作用可增强鹰嘴豆(L.)的化学成分。
Plants (Basel). 2023 Aug 27;12(17):3073. doi: 10.3390/plants12173073.
2
Novel Mutation in the Acetohydroxyacid Synthase (AHAS), Gene Confers Imidazolinone Resistance in Chickpea L. Plants.乙酰羟酸合酶(AHAS)基因中的新突变赋予鹰嘴豆对咪唑啉酮的抗性。
Plants (Basel). 2021 Dec 16;10(12):2791. doi: 10.3390/plants10122791.
3
Herbicide Resistance: Another Hot Agronomic Trait for Plant Genome Editing.除草剂抗性:植物基因组编辑的另一个热门农艺性状。
Plants (Basel). 2021 Mar 24;10(4):621. doi: 10.3390/plants10040621.
4
Mechanisms of evolved herbicide resistance.进化出的除草剂抗性机制。
J Biol Chem. 2020 Jul 24;295(30):10307-10330. doi: 10.1074/jbc.REV120.013572. Epub 2020 May 19.
5
Glyphosate does not show higher phytotoxicity than cadmium: Cross talk and metabolic changes in common herb.草甘膦的植物毒性并不高于镉:常见除草剂中的相互作用与代谢变化
J Hazard Mater. 2020 Feb 5;383:121250. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121250. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
6
Direct and Indirect Effects of Herbicides on Insect Herbivores in Rice, Oryza sativa.除草剂对水稻(Oryza sativa)中昆虫食草动物的直接和间接影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 6;9(1):6998. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43361-w.
7
Defenses Against ROS in Crops and Weeds: The Effects of Interference and Herbicides.作物和杂草中的 ROS 防御:干扰和除草剂的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Mar 2;20(5):1086. doi: 10.3390/ijms20051086.
8
Glyphosate induced toxicity to chickpea plants and stress alleviation by herbicide tolerant phosphate solubilizing PSBB1 carrying multifarious plant growth promoting activities.草甘膦对鹰嘴豆植株的毒性以及携带多种促进植物生长活性的耐除草剂解磷细菌PSBB1对其胁迫的缓解作用。
3 Biotech. 2018 Feb;8(2):131. doi: 10.1007/s13205-018-1145-y. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
9
Seed Biochemical Analysis Based Profiling of Diverse Wheat Genetic Resource from Pakistan.基于种子生化分析的巴基斯坦多种小麦遗传资源剖析
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jul 20;8:1276. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01276. eCollection 2017.
10
Discovery of Putative Herbicide Resistance Genes and Its Regulatory Network in Chickpea Using Transcriptome Sequencing.利用转录组测序在鹰嘴豆中发现假定的除草剂抗性基因及其调控网络
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jun 7;8:958. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00958. eCollection 2017.