MCD Global Health, 8403 Colesville Road, Suite 320, 20910, Silver Spring, USA.
MCD Global Health, Av. Parques de Africa, Malabo, Equatorial Guinea.
Malar J. 2024 Oct 29;23(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-05139-y.
Since 2015, malaria vector control on Bioko Island has relied heavily upon long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) to complement other interventions. Despite significant resources utilised, however, achieving and maintaining high coverage has been elusive. Here, core LLIN indicators were used to assess and redefine distribution strategies.
LLIN indicators were estimated for Bioko Island between 2015 and 2022 using a 1x1 km grid of areas. The way these indicators interacted was used to critically assess coverage targets. Particular attention was paid to spatial heterogeneity and to differences between urban Malabo, the capital, and the rural periphery.
LLIN coverage according to all indicators varied substantially across areas, decreased significantly soon after mass distribution campaigns (MDC) and, with few exceptions, remained consistently below the recommended target. Use was strongly correlated with population access, particularly in Malabo. After a change in strategy in Malabo from MDC to fixed distribution points, use-to-access showed significant improvement, indicating those who obtained their nets from these sources were more likely to keep them and use them. Moreover, their use rates were significantly higher than those of whom sourced their nets elsewhere.
Striking a better balance between LLIN distribution efficiency and coverage represents a major challenge as LLIN retention and use rates remain low despite high access resulting from MDC. The cost-benefit of fixed distribution points in Malabo revealed significant advantages, offering a viable alternative for ensuring access to LLINs to those who use them.
自 2015 年以来,比奥科岛的疟疾病媒控制主要依赖长效驱虫蚊帐(LLIN)来补充其他干预措施。然而,尽管投入了大量资源,实现和维持高覆盖率的目标仍然难以实现。在这里,核心 LLIN 指标被用来评估和重新定义分发策略。
2015 年至 2022 年期间,使用 1x1 公里的区域网格来估计比奥科岛的 LLIN 指标。利用这些指标的相互作用来批判性地评估覆盖目标。特别关注空间异质性以及首都马拉博和农村外围之间的差异。
根据所有指标,LLIN 覆盖率在不同地区差异很大,在大规模分发活动(MDC)后迅速显著下降,除了少数例外,一直低于建议的目标。使用率与人口获得情况密切相关,特别是在马拉博。在马拉博的策略从 MDC 改为固定分发点后,使用率与获得率之间显示出显著的改善,这表明那些从这些来源获得蚊帐的人更有可能保留并使用它们。此外,他们的使用率明显高于那些从其他地方获得蚊帐的人。
尽管 MDC 导致获得率很高,但 LLIN 的保留率和使用率仍然很低,因此在 LLIN 分发效率和覆盖率之间取得更好的平衡是一个主要挑战。马拉博固定分发点的成本效益显示出显著的优势,为确保那些使用 LLIN 的人获得 LLIN 提供了可行的替代方案。