Suppr超能文献

预测视力的仪器。临床比较。

Instruments for predicting visual acuity. A clinical comparison.

作者信息

Spurny R C, Zaldivar R, Belcher C D, Simmons R J

出版信息

Arch Ophthalmol. 1986 Feb;104(2):196-200. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1986.01050140050018.

Abstract

A series of 54 eyes in 50 patients had preoperative predictions of postoperative visual acuity, using both a white-light interferometer (Lotmar Visometer) and a Snellen chart projector (Guyton-Minkowski Potential Acuity Meter). The predicted vision by each instrument was compared with the actual postoperative vision. Forty eyes in 36 of these patients, 25 with concurrent eye disease, had cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation. Fifteen eyes in 15 patients, 11 with concurrent eye disease, had neodymium-YAG laser posterior capsulotomy. The Visometer gave more accurate predictions than the Potential Acuity Meter in cataract patients with open angle glaucoma, even with glaucomatous visual field loss, and in patients with a visual acuity of less than 20/400 due to advanced cataract formation.

摘要

50名患者的54只眼睛在术前使用白光干涉仪(洛特马尔视力计)和斯内伦图表投影仪(盖顿 - 明科夫斯基潜在视力计)对术后视力进行了预测。将每种仪器预测的视力与实际术后视力进行比较。这些患者中的36例(25例伴有眼部疾病)的40只眼睛接受了白内障摘除联合人工晶状体植入术。15例患者的15只眼睛(11例伴有眼部疾病)接受了钕 - YAG激光后囊切开术。在患有开角型青光眼的白内障患者中,即使存在青光眼性视野缺损,以及因白内障晚期导致视力低于20/400的患者中,视力计比潜在视力计给出的预测更准确。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验