• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在退行性半月板撕裂非手术治疗前对患者的治疗可信度、治疗预期和症状预期进行特征分析。

Characterizing Treatment Credibility, Treatment Expectancy, and Symptom Expectancy in Patients Before Nonoperative Treatment for Degenerative Meniscal Tears.

作者信息

Bisson Leslie J, Weiss-Laxer Nomi S, Katz Jeffrey N, Haider Mohammad N, Flikkema Kyle B, Lackner Jeffrey M

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Oct 28;12(10):23259671241285431. doi: 10.1177/23259671241285431. eCollection 2024 Oct.

DOI:10.1177/23259671241285431
PMID:39473766
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11520006/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of nonspecific factors, such as treatment credibility, treatment expectancy, and symptom expectancy, may shape the outcomes of the nonoperative treatment of degenerative meniscal tears (DMTs).

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to characterize treatment credibility and expectancy, symptom expectancy, and patient and clinical correlates of these factors among participants before undergoing 4 nonoperative treatment programs for DMTs. It was hypothesized that (1) treatment credibility scores would be similar across patient and baseline clinical subgroups and (2) treatment expectancy and symptom expectancy scores would be lower in older patients and among those reporting a longer pain duration or greater pain intensity.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

In 126 participants, validated scales were administered before treatment to assess the credibility of the assigned treatment (possible score of 1-9) as well as the expectations of treatment outcomes (0-100) and symptom improvement (1-5). Patient and clinical characteristics associated with these variables were examined.

RESULTS

On average, participants (mean age, 58 years [range, 45-75 years]; 51% female; 94% White) expected the treatment to improve their symptoms by a mean of 68% and expected their symptoms to be "very likely" to improve. Participants with a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m had lower mean treatment credibility (6.09 ± 1.81) and treatment expectancy (64.53 ± 25.16) scores on bivariate analyses than those with a BMI <30 kg/m (6.73 ± 1.69 [ = .045] and 72.86 ± 19.20 [ = .039], respectively). Participants reporting a pain duration ≥3 months also had lower mean treatment expectancy (63.85 ± 23.83) and symptom expectancy (3.70 ± 0.85) scores compared to those reporting a pain duration <3 months (75.52 ± 18.93 [ = .003] and 4.16 ± 0.67 [ = .001], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Most patients about to undergo physical therapy for DMTs considered it to be between "somewhat" and "very" credible and believed that their symptoms, on average, were "very likely" to improve. Although not supported by most evidence, patients with a BMI ≥30 kg/m believed physical therapy to be less credible and had lower treatment and symptom expectations, and those with symptoms present for ≥3 months had lower treatment and symptom expectations as well. Whether these nonspecific factors influence outcomes should be considered for further research.

摘要

背景

非特异性因素,如治疗可信度、治疗期望和症状期望,可能会影响退行性半月板撕裂(DMT)非手术治疗的结果。

目的/假设:本研究的目的是在参与者接受4种DMT非手术治疗方案之前,对治疗可信度、治疗期望、症状期望以及这些因素的患者和临床相关性进行特征描述。研究假设为:(1)不同患者和基线临床亚组的治疗可信度评分相似;(2)老年患者以及报告疼痛持续时间较长或疼痛强度较大的患者的治疗期望和症状期望评分较低。

研究设计

队列研究;证据等级为3级。

方法

对126名参与者在治疗前使用经过验证的量表,以评估所分配治疗的可信度(可能得分为1 - 9)以及对治疗结果(0 - 100)和症状改善(1 - 5)的期望。检查与这些变量相关的患者和临床特征。

结果

平均而言,参与者(平均年龄58岁[范围45 - 75岁];51%为女性;94%为白人)预计治疗能使症状平均改善68%,并认为症状“非常可能”改善。在双变量分析中,体重指数(BMI)≥30 kg/m²的参与者的平均治疗可信度(6.09 ± 1.81)和治疗期望(64.53 ± 25.16)得分低于BMI < 30 kg/m²的参与者(分别为6.73 ± 1.69 [P = 0.045]和72.86 ± 19.20 [P = 0.039])。与报告疼痛持续时间<3个月的参与者相比,报告疼痛持续时间≥3个月的参与者的平均治疗期望(63.85 ± 23.83)和症状期望(3.70 ± 0.85)得分也较低(分别为75.52 ± 18.93 [P = 0.003]和4.16 ± 0.67 [P = 0.001])。

结论

大多数即将接受DMT物理治疗的患者认为其可信度在“有点”到“非常”之间,并相信他们的症状平均“非常可能”改善。尽管大多数证据不支持,但BMI≥30 kg/m²的患者认为物理治疗的可信度较低,治疗和症状期望也较低,症状出现≥3个月的患者的治疗和症状期望同样较低。这些非特异性因素是否会影响治疗结果值得进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Characterizing Treatment Credibility, Treatment Expectancy, and Symptom Expectancy in Patients Before Nonoperative Treatment for Degenerative Meniscal Tears.在退行性半月板撕裂非手术治疗前对患者的治疗可信度、治疗预期和症状预期进行特征分析。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Oct 28;12(10):23259671241285431. doi: 10.1177/23259671241285431. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Patient reported outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for traumatic or degenerative meniscal tears: comparative prospective cohort study.接受关节镜下部分半月板切除术治疗创伤性或退变性半月板撕裂患者的患者报告结局:比较性前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ. 2017 Feb 2;356:j356. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j356.
3
A comparative study of meniscectomy and nonoperative treatment for degenerative horizontal tears of the medial meniscus.内侧半月板退行性水平撕裂的半月板切除术与非手术治疗的对比研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1565-70. doi: 10.1177/0363546513488518. Epub 2013 May 23.
4
Age, Sex, and BMI Differences Related to Repairable Meniscal Tears in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients.与小儿及青少年患者可修复半月板撕裂相关的年龄、性别和体重指数差异
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Feb;51(2):389-397. doi: 10.1177/03635465221145939. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
5
Association Between Baseline Meniscal Symptoms and Outcomes of Operative and Nonoperative Treatment of Meniscal Tear in Patients With Osteoarthritis.膝关节骨关节炎患者半月板撕裂的手术与非手术治疗的结局与基线半月板症状的相关性。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2022 Aug;74(8):1384-1390. doi: 10.1002/acr.24588. Epub 2022 May 6.
6
Improved Outcome With Knee Arthroscopy Relative to Physiotherapy for Symptomatic Unstable Meniscal Tears: 2-Year Prospective Cohort Study.膝关节镜相对于物理疗法治疗有症状不稳定半月板撕裂的改善结果:2 年前瞻性队列研究。
Sports Health. 2024 May-Jun;16(3):370-376. doi: 10.1177/19417381231156378. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
7
Outcomes of Arthroscopic All-Inside Repair Versus Observation in Older Patients With Meniscus Root Tears.关节镜全内修复与观察治疗半月板根部撕裂老年患者的结局比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Apr;48(5):1127-1133. doi: 10.1177/0363546520909828. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
8
Which Factors Are Associated With Satisfaction With Treatment Results in Patients With Hand and Wrist Conditions? A Large Cohort Analysis.哪些因素与手部和腕部疾病患者对治疗结果的满意度相关?一项大型队列分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Jul 1;480(7):1287-1301. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002107. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
9
Costs and Timing of Surgery in the Management of Meniscal Tears.半月板撕裂治疗中手术的成本与时机
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Jul 29;12(7):23259671241257881. doi: 10.1177/23259671241257881. eCollection 2024 Jul.
10
Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction With Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy for Degenerative and Traumatic Tears in Middle-Aged Patients With No or Mild Osteoarthritis.关节镜下部分半月板切除术治疗中青年无或轻度骨关节炎患者退行性和创伤性半月板撕裂的疗效和患者满意度。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Aug;47(10):2412-2419. doi: 10.1177/0363546519857589. Epub 2019 Jun 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Physical Therapy vs Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy in People With Degenerative Meniscal Tears: Five-Year Follow-up of the ESCAPE Randomized Clinical Trial.物理治疗与关节镜下部分半月板切除术治疗退行性半月板撕裂的效果:ESCAPE 随机临床试验 5 年随访。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2220394. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.20394.
2
The economic burden of knee and hip osteoarthritis: absenteeism and costs in the Dutch workforce.膝和髋关节骨关节炎的经济负担:荷兰劳动力中的旷工和成本。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Apr 18;23(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05306-9.
3
Predictors of the outcome of physiotherapy following a meniscus tear: A systematic review.半月板撕裂后物理治疗结果的预测因素:系统评价。
Knee. 2021 Dec;33:125-142. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.08.035. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
4
Mechanical symptoms and meniscal tear: a reappraisal.机械症状与半月板撕裂:再评价。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2022 Feb;30(2):178-183. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.09.009. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
5
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
6
Not Just Nonspecific Factors: The Roles of Alliance and Expectancy in Treatment, and Their Neurobiological Underpinnings.不仅仅是非特异性因素:联盟和期望在治疗中的作用及其神经生物学基础。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2019 Jan 29;12:293. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00293. eCollection 2018.
7
The TeMPO trial (treatment of meniscal tears in osteoarthritis): rationale and design features for a four arm randomized controlled clinical trial.TeMPO试验(骨关节炎半月板撕裂的治疗):一项四臂随机对照临床试验的原理和设计特点
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Dec 1;19(1):429. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2327-9.
8
Effect of Early Surgery vs Physical Therapy on Knee Function Among Patients With Nonobstructive Meniscal Tears: The ESCAPE Randomized Clinical Trial.非结构性半月板撕裂患者早期手术与物理治疗对膝关节功能的影响:ESCAPE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Oct 2;320(13):1328-1337. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13308.
9
Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus placebo surgery for a degenerative meniscus tear: a 2-year follow-up of the randomised controlled trial.关节镜下半月板部分切除术与安慰剂手术治疗退行性半月板撕裂:一项随机对照试验的 2 年随访。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Feb;77(2):188-195. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211172. Epub 2017 May 18.
10
Predictors and Outcomes of Crossover to Surgery from Physical Therapy for Meniscal Tear and Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Trial Comparing Physical Therapy and Surgery.半月板撕裂和骨关节炎患者从物理治疗转为手术治疗的预测因素及结果:一项比较物理治疗与手术治疗的随机试验
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Nov 16;98(22):1890-1896. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01466.