• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同视觉意象能力患病率的国际评估。

An international estimate of the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities.

作者信息

Wright David J, Scott Matthew W, Kraeutner Sarah N, Barhoun Pamela, Bertollo Maurizio, Campbell Mark J, Waltzing Baptiste M, Dahm Stephan F, Esselaar Maaike, Frank Cornelia, Hardwick Robert M, Fuelscher Ian, Marshall Ben, Hodges Nicola J, Hyde Christian, Holmes Paul S

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.

School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 15;15:1454107. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1454107. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1454107
PMID:39474086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11518826/
Abstract

The aim of this research was to establish prevalence estimates for aphantasia, hypophantasia, typical imagery ability, and hyperphantasia in a large multi-national cohort. In Study 1, the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire was completed by 3,049 participants. Results indicated prevalence estimates of 1.2% for aphantasia, 3% for hypophantasia, 89.9% for typical imagery ability, and 5.9% for hyperphantasia. In Study 2, to replicate these findings in a larger sample, the Study 1 data were combined with openly available data from previous prevalence studies to create a total sample of 9,063 participants. Re-analysis of this data confirmed prevalence estimates of 0.9% for aphantasia, 3.3% for hypophantasia, 89.7% for typical imagery ability, and 6.1% for hyperphantasia. These robust and up-to-date estimates provide enhanced clarity to researchers regarding the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities and provide a platform for future studies exploring the role of visual imagery in various cognitive and behavioral tasks.

摘要

本研究的目的是在一个大型跨国队列中确定无想象能力、低想象能力、典型意象能力和高想象能力的患病率估计值。在研究1中,3049名参与者完成了视觉意象生动性问卷。结果表明,无想象能力的患病率估计为1.2%,低想象能力为3%,典型意象能力为89.9%,高想象能力为5.9%。在研究2中,为了在更大的样本中重复这些发现,将研究1的数据与先前患病率研究中公开可用的数据相结合,创建了一个包含9063名参与者的总样本。对这些数据的重新分析证实,无想象能力的患病率估计为0.9%,低想象能力为3.3%,典型意象能力为89.7%,高想象能力为6.1%。这些可靠且最新的估计值为研究人员提供了关于不同视觉意象能力患病率的更清晰信息,并为未来探索视觉意象在各种认知和行为任务中的作用的研究提供了一个平台。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9559/11518826/a06cef8488a9/fpsyg-15-1454107-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9559/11518826/41b3b1550651/fpsyg-15-1454107-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9559/11518826/ab61fcf2f9e4/fpsyg-15-1454107-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9559/11518826/4d33eadd5aa3/fpsyg-15-1454107-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9559/11518826/a06cef8488a9/fpsyg-15-1454107-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9559/11518826/41b3b1550651/fpsyg-15-1454107-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9559/11518826/ab61fcf2f9e4/fpsyg-15-1454107-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9559/11518826/4d33eadd5aa3/fpsyg-15-1454107-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9559/11518826/a06cef8488a9/fpsyg-15-1454107-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
An international estimate of the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities.不同视觉意象能力患病率的国际评估。
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 15;15:1454107. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1454107. eCollection 2024.
2
Behavioral and Neural Signatures of Visual Imagery Vividness Extremes: Aphantasia versus Hyperphantasia.视觉意象生动性极端情况的行为和神经特征:心盲症与超心象症。
Cereb Cortex Commun. 2021 May 5;2(2):tgab035. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgab035. eCollection 2021.
3
Phantasia-The psychological significance of lifelong visual imagery vividness extremes.幻像——终生视觉意象生动程度极端情况的心理学意义。
Cortex. 2020 Sep;130:426-440. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 May 4.
4
Aphantasia and hyperphantasia: exploring imagery vividness extremes.空想缺失和空想过度:探索意象鲜明度的极端情况。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2024 May;28(5):467-480. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2024.02.007. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
5
Phantasia, aphantasia, and hyperphantasia: Empirical data and conceptual considerations.幻觉、无幻觉和超幻觉:经验数据和概念思考。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024 Sep;164:105819. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105819. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
6
Diversity of aphantasia revealed by multiple assessments of visual imagery, multisensory imagery, and cognitive style.通过对视觉表象、多感官表象和认知风格的多重评估揭示的phantasia的多样性。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 18;14:1174873. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1174873. eCollection 2023.
7
The prevalence of aphantasia (imagery weakness) in the general population.一般人群中想象缺失(意象缺失)的流行率。
Conscious Cogn. 2022 Jan;97:103243. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2021.103243. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
8
Congenital lack and extraordinary ability in object and spatial imagery: An investigation on sub-types of aphantasia and hyperphantasia.先天性物体和空间意象缺失与超常能力:对空想和超空想亚型的研究。
Conscious Cogn. 2022 Aug;103:103360. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103360. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
9
Defining and 'diagnosing' aphantasia: Condition or individual difference?定义和“诊断”想象缺失症:病症还是个体差异?
Cortex. 2023 Dec;169:220-234. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.09.004. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
10
Aphantasia: The science of visual imagery extremes.空想症:视觉意象极端现象的科学。
Handb Clin Neurol. 2021;178:277-296. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-821377-3.00012-X.

本文引用的文献

1
Aphantasia and involuntary imagery.空想症和无意识意象。
Conscious Cogn. 2024 Apr;120:103679. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2024.103679. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
2
Explicit and implicit motor simulations are impaired in individuals with aphantasia.在患有想象障碍的个体中,外显和内隐运动模拟会受到损害。
Brain Commun. 2024 Mar 21;6(2):fcae072. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae072. eCollection 2024.
3
Guidelines for reporting action simulation studies (GRASS): Proposals to improve reporting of research in motor imagery and action observation.
动作模拟研究报告指南(GRASS):改善运动想象和动作观察研究报告的建议。
Neuropsychologia. 2024 Jan 10;192:108733. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108733. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
4
Defining and 'diagnosing' aphantasia: Condition or individual difference?定义和“诊断”想象缺失症:病症还是个体差异?
Cortex. 2023 Dec;169:220-234. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.09.004. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
5
Aphantasia within the framework of neurodivergence: Some preliminary data and the curse of the confidence gap.神经多样性框架内的想象缺失:一些初步数据和信心差距的诅咒。
Conscious Cogn. 2023 Oct;115:103567. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2023.103567. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
6
The role of visual imagery in face recognition and the construction of facial composites. Evidence from Aphantasia.视觉意象在人脸识别和面部合成构建中的作用。来自空想症的证据。
Cortex. 2023 Oct;167:318-334. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.06.015. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
7
Assessing aphantasia prevalence and the relation of self-reported imagery abilities and memory task performance.评估心盲症的患病率以及自我报告的意象能力与记忆任务表现之间的关系。
Conscious Cogn. 2023 Aug;113:103548. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2023.103548. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
8
Learning motor actions via imagery-perceptual or motor learning?通过意象-感知学习还是运动学习来掌握运动动作?
Psychol Res. 2024 Sep;88(6):1820-1832. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01787-4. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
9
Enhancing motor imagery practice using synchronous action observation.使用同步动作观察增强运动想象练习。
Psychol Res. 2024 Sep;88(6):1891-1907. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01768-7. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
10
The multisensory nature of human action imagery.人类动作意象的多感官本质。
Psychol Res. 2024 Sep;88(6):1870-1882. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01771-y. Epub 2022 Nov 28.