Suppr超能文献

通过对视觉表象、多感官表象和认知风格的多重评估揭示的phantasia的多样性。

Diversity of aphantasia revealed by multiple assessments of visual imagery, multisensory imagery, and cognitive style.

作者信息

Takahashi Junichi, Saito Godai, Omura Kazufumi, Yasunaga Daichi, Sugimura Shinichiro, Sakamoto Shuichi, Horikawa Tomoyasu, Gyoba Jiro

机构信息

Faculty of Human Development and Culture, Fukushima University, Fukushima, Japan.

Department of Psychology, Graduate School of Arts and Letters, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 18;14:1174873. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1174873. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Aphantasia-a condition wherein individuals have a reduced or absent construction of voluntary visual imagery-is diagnosed using either the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ) or self-identification. However, a significant discrepancy exists between the proportions of aphantasia in the populations assessed using these two criteria. It is unclear why the reported proportions differ excessively and what percentage of people cannot form visual imagery. We investigated the replicability of the proportion of people with aphantasia using both criteria in the same population of participants. Therefore, we explored the potential causes of the discrepancy and characteristics of putative aphantasia in terms of multisensory imagery, cognitive style, and face recognition ability. First, we conducted an online sampling study (Study 1:  = 2,871) using the VVIQ, self-identification of a reduction in visual imagery, Questionnaire upon Mental Imagery (QMI), and Verbalizer-Visualizer Questionnaire (VVQ). We found that 3.7 and 12.1% fulfilled the VVIQ and self-identification criteria, respectively, roughly replicating the proportions reported in previous studies. The self-identification criterion-but not the VVIQ criterion-contains items related to face recognition; hence, we suspected that face recognition ability was factor contributing to this discrepancy and conducted another online sampling study (Study 2:  = 774). We found a significant correlation between VVIQ and face recognition ability in the control group with self-identification, but not in the group defined by low VVIQ (VVIQ ≤32). As the participants in the control group with self-identification tended to exhibit moderately high VVIQ scores but low face recognition ability, we reason that the discrepancy can be partially explained by the contamination of individual differences in face recognition ability. Additional analyses of Study 1 revealed that the aphantasia group included participants who lacked all types of sensory imagery or only visual imagery in multisensory imagery and exhibited a non-specific cognitive style. This study indicates that the VVIQ alone may be insufficient to diagnose individuals who report an inability to form visual imagery. Furthermore, we highlight the importance of multiple assessments-along with the VVIQ-to better understand the diversity of imagery in aphantasia.

摘要

phantasia(想象障碍)——一种个体构建自愿视觉意象的能力减弱或缺失的状况——可通过视觉意象生动性问卷(VVIQ)或自我识别来诊断。然而,使用这两种标准评估的人群中想象障碍的比例存在显著差异。目前尚不清楚为何报告的比例差异过大,以及无法形成视觉意象的人群比例是多少。我们在同一组参与者中使用这两种标准研究了想象障碍人群比例的可重复性。因此,我们从多感官意象、认知风格和面部识别能力方面探讨了差异的潜在原因以及假定的想象障碍的特征。首先,我们使用VVIQ、视觉意象减少的自我识别、心理意象问卷(QMI)和言语者 - 视觉者问卷(VVQ)进行了一项在线抽样研究(研究1:n = 2871)。我们发现,分别有3.7%和12.1%的人符合VVIQ和自我识别标准,大致重现了先前研究报告的比例。自我识别标准(而非VVIQ标准)包含与面部识别相关的项目;因此,我们怀疑面部识别能力是导致这种差异的一个因素,并进行了另一项在线抽样研究(研究2:n = 774)。我们发现,在自我识别的对照组中,VVIQ与面部识别能力之间存在显著相关性,但在低VVIQ(VVIQ≤32)定义的组中则不存在。由于自我识别的对照组中的参与者往往表现出中等偏高的VVIQ分数但面部识别能力较低,我们推断这种差异可以部分由面部识别能力个体差异的干扰来解释。对研究1的进一步分析表明,想象障碍组包括在多感官意象中缺乏所有类型的感官意象或仅缺乏视觉意象且表现出非特异性认知风格的参与者。这项研究表明,仅靠VVIQ可能不足以诊断那些报告无法形成视觉意象的个体。此外,我们强调了除VVIQ之外进行多项评估对于更好地理解想象障碍中意象多样性的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e011/10403065/361ea6eb1db3/fpsyg-14-1174873-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验