• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对Cochrane系统评价数据库中肿瘤学领域作者署名性别趋势的20年分析。

A 20-year analysis of gender trends in oncology authorship in the Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

作者信息

Levy Morgan S, Samarakoon Thilani, Smith Caleigh, Goo Irene, Duthely Lunthita M, Van Zuilen Maria, Huang Marilyn, Pillai Asha B

机构信息

Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States.

Department of Medical Education, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 15;14:1450475. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1450475. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2024.1450475
PMID:39474110
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11518686/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate global longitudinal publication trends in oncology in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) from 2001-2020.

DESIGN

Retrospective bibliometric analysis.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measures were the numbers and percentages of women as first, last, and corresponding author across all CDSR oncology publications. Additional outcomes included authorship differences between countries and percentages of women authors over time compared using the Cochran-Armitage trend test.

RESULTS

In total, 548 articles were analyzed. Women were first authors in 52.26% (n=277) and corresponding authors in 50.75% (n=272), respectively. Women represented only 39.4% (n=210) of last authors, significantly less frequent than male counterparts (p < 0.001). The percentage of women last and corresponding authors has increased significantly in the past 20 years (p < 0.05). Countries such as the Netherlands and Australia consistently showed equitable representation in first, corresponding, and last authorship, while other countries such as Italy and China had uniformly low rates of female authorship.

COCLUSIONS

Our results highlight patterns of gender inequity in oncology publication authorship in the CDSR from 2001-2020 at a global level. Notably, women were less likely to serve in the last author position which, independent of assigned corresponding authorship, is generally assumed in academic oncology to designate the leader of a published study. Substantive efforts to correct this disparity are needed to achieve gender parity in publicly perceived leadership in oncology publications.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估2001年至2020年Cochrane系统评价数据库(CDSR)中肿瘤学领域全球纵向发表趋势。

设计

回顾性文献计量分析。

主要和次要结局指标

主要结局指标是CDSR中所有肿瘤学出版物中女性作为第一作者、最后作者和通讯作者的数量及百分比。其他结局包括国家间的作者身份差异,以及使用 Cochr an-Armitage趋势检验比较不同时间女性作者的百分比。

结果

共分析了548篇文章。女性分别占第一作者的52.26%(n = 277)和通讯作者的50.75%(n = 272)。女性仅占最后作者的39.4%(n = 210),明显低于男性同行(p < 0.001)。在过去20年中,女性最后作者和通讯作者的百分比显著增加(p < 0.05)。荷兰和澳大利亚等国家在第一作者、通讯作者和最后作者身份方面始终表现出公平的代表性,而意大利和中国等其他国家女性作者比例一直较低。

结论

我们的结果突出了2001年至2020年全球范围内CDSR中肿瘤学出版物作者身份方面的性别不平等模式。值得注意的是,女性担任最后作者的可能性较小,在学术肿瘤学中,独立于指定的通讯作者身份,最后作者通常被认为是已发表研究的负责人。需要做出实质性努力来纠正这种差异以在肿瘤学出版物的公众认知领导力方面实现性别平等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed8f/11518686/cad5d7cc3cf1/fonc-14-1450475-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed8f/11518686/4c0959eb8df6/fonc-14-1450475-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed8f/11518686/cad5d7cc3cf1/fonc-14-1450475-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed8f/11518686/4c0959eb8df6/fonc-14-1450475-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed8f/11518686/cad5d7cc3cf1/fonc-14-1450475-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A 20-year analysis of gender trends in oncology authorship in the Cochrane database of systematic reviews.对Cochrane系统评价数据库中肿瘤学领域作者署名性别趋势的20年分析。
Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 15;14:1450475. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1450475. eCollection 2024.
2
Neuro-oncology authorship trends in gender since 1944: a systematic review of 14,020 articles from five top-tier academic journals.自 1944 年以来神经肿瘤学作者性别趋势的系统评价:对五个顶级学术期刊的 14020 篇文章的分析。
J Neurosurg. 2022 Nov 25;139(1):1-10. doi: 10.3171/2022.10.JNS221183. Print 2023 Jul 1.
3
Gender parity in scientific authorship in a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: a bibliometric analysis.在英国国家健康研究所生物医学研究中心的科学著作中实现性别均等:文献计量学分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 23;11(3):e037935. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037935.
4
Gender trends in authorship of spine-related academic literature-a 39-year perspective.脊柱相关学术文献著者的性别趋势——39 年的视角。
Spine J. 2017 Nov;17(11):1749-1754. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.041. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
5
Gender Trends in Authorship in Psychiatry Journals From 2008 to 2018.2008 年至 2018 年精神病学期刊作者性别趋势。
Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 15;86(8):639-646. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.02.010. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
6
Authorship Equity and Gender Representation in Global Oncology Publications.全球肿瘤学出版物中的作者权益和性别代表性。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2022 Jan;8:e2100369. doi: 10.1200/GO.21.00369.
7
Trends in gender of authors of original research in oncology among major medical journals: a retrospective bibliometric study.主要医学期刊中肿瘤学原创研究作者的性别趋势:一项回顾性文献计量学研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 18;11(10):e046618. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046618.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Trends in Female Authorship in Major Journals of 3 Oncology Disciplines, 2002-2018.2002-2018 年三大肿瘤学科主要期刊中女性作者的趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e212252. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.2252.
10
Authorship Trends and Disparities in Cardiothoracic Surgery.心胸外科领域的作者趋势和差异。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 Dec;116(6):1329-1334. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.09.046. Epub 2022 Oct 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Five Strategies Leaders in Academic Medicine Can Implement Now to Enhance Gender Equity.五项策略助力高校医学领导者实现性别平等
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 13;25:e47933. doi: 10.2196/47933.
2
Six Practical Strategies to Mentor and Sponsor Women in Academic Medicine.六种实用策略,助力医学学术领域中的女性导师和提携人
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 25;25:e47799. doi: 10.2196/47799.
3
Race/Ethnicity and Gender Representation in Hematology and Oncology Editorial Boards: What is the State of Diversity?血液学和肿瘤学编辑委员会中的种族/民族和性别代表性:多样性的现状如何?
Oncologist. 2023 Jul 5;28(7):609-617. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad103.
4
The Issue of Gender Bias Represented in Authorship in the Fields of Exercise and Rehabilitation: A 5-Year Research in Indexed Journals.运动与康复领域作者署名中存在的性别偏见问题:对索引期刊的五年研究
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023 Jan 30;8(1):18. doi: 10.3390/jfmk8010018.
5
Academic medicine's glass ceiling: Author's gender in top three medical research journals impacts probability of future publication success.学术医学的玻璃天花板:顶级医学研究期刊中作者的性别会影响其未来的出版成功率。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 20;17(4):e0261209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261209. eCollection 2022.
6
Overestimating women's representation in medicine: a survey of medical professionals' estimates and their(un)willingness to support gender equality initiatives.高估女性在医学领域的代表性:对医学专业人士的估计及其(不)愿意支持性别平等倡议的调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 21;12(3):e054769. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054769.
7
Authorship Equity and Gender Representation in Global Oncology Publications.全球肿瘤学出版物中的作者权益和性别代表性。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2022 Jan;8:e2100369. doi: 10.1200/GO.21.00369.
8
Toward Gender Equity in Academic Promotions.迈向学术晋升中的性别平等。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Sep 1;181(9):1155-1156. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.3471.
9
Gender Disparities in Journal Citations-Another Metric of Inequity in Academia.期刊引用中的性别差异——学术界不平等的另一个衡量标准。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2114787. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14787.
10
Take me to your leader: Reporting structures and equity in academic gynecologic oncology.带我去见你们的领导:妇科肿瘤学学术报告结构与公平性。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jun;157(3):759-764. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.03.031. Epub 2020 Apr 7.