• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊柱相关学术文献著者的性别趋势——39 年的视角。

Gender trends in authorship of spine-related academic literature-a 39-year perspective.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 500 Parnassus Ave MU-320W, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 500 Parnassus Ave MU-320W, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.

出版信息

Spine J. 2017 Nov;17(11):1749-1754. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.041. Epub 2017 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.041
PMID:28673828
Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Despite recent advances in gender equity in medicine, the representation of women in orthopedic and neurosurgery remains particularly low. Furthermore, compared with their male colleagues, female faculty members are less likely to publish research, limiting opportunities in the academic promotion process. Understanding disparities in research productivity provides insight into the "gender gap" in the spine surgeon workforce.

PURPOSE

This study aims to determine the representation and longevity of female physician-investigators among the authors of five spine-related research journals from 1978 to 2016.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective bibliometric review.

METHODS

The authors of original research articles from five prominent spine-related journals (European Spine Journal, The Spine Journal, Spine, Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine) were extracted from PubMed. For authors with a complete first name listed, gender was determined by matching first name using an online database containing 216,286 distinct names across 79 countries and 89 languages. The proportion of female first and senior authors was determined during the time periods 1978 to 1994, 1995 to 1999, 2000 to 2004, 2005 to 2009, and 2010 to 2016. The authors who had their first paper published between 2000 and 2009 were included in additional analyses for publication count and longevity (whether additional articles were published 5 years after first publication). Student t test, chi-square analysis, and Cochran-Armitage trend test were used to determine significance between groups.

RESULTS

From 1978 to 2016, 28,882 original research articles were published in the five spine-related journals. A total of 24,334 abstracts (90.9%) had first names listed, identifying 120,723 authors, in total of which 100,286 were successfully matched to a gender. A total of 33,480 unique authors were identified (female authors: 31.8%). Female representation increased for first and senior authors from 6.5% and 4.7% (1978-1994) to 18.5% and 13.6% (2010-2016, p<.001). Growth in female senior author representation declined after 2000 (12.3% vs. 12.9% vs. 13.5% between 2000-2004, 2005-2009, and 2010-2016). Compared with male authors, on average, female authors published fewer articles (mean: 2.1 vs. 3.3, p<.001). Of 15,304 authors who first published during 2000 to 2009, 3,478 authors (22.7%) continued to publish 5 years after their first publication. Female authors were less likely to continue publishing after their first article (15.3% of female authors vs. 24.8%, p<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Female representation in academic spine research has doubled over the past 4 decades, although the growth of female representation as senior author has plateaued. Female physician-investigators are half as likely to continue participating in spine-related research longer than 5 years and on average publish half as many articles as senior author. In addition to recruiting more women into research, efforts should be made to identify and address barriers in research advancement and promotion for female physician-investigators.

摘要

背景

尽管医学领域的性别平等最近取得了一些进展,但在骨科和神经外科领域,女性的代表性仍然特别低。此外,与男性同行相比,女性教职员工发表研究的可能性较低,这限制了她们在学术晋升过程中的机会。了解研究成果方面的差异可以深入了解脊柱外科医生队伍中的“性别差距”。

目的

本研究旨在确定从 1978 年到 2016 年,在五个与脊柱相关的研究期刊的作者中,女性医师研究员的代表性和任职时间。

研究设计

这是一项回顾性的文献计量学研究。

方法

从五个著名的脊柱相关期刊(欧洲脊柱杂志、脊柱杂志、脊柱、脊柱疾病与技术杂志和神经外科杂志:脊柱)的 PubMed 中提取原始研究文章的作者。对于有完整列出的第一名字的作者,通过使用一个包含 79 个国家和 89 种语言的 216286 个不同名字的在线数据库来确定其性别。在 1978 年至 1994 年、1995 年至 1999 年、2000 年至 2004 年、2005 年至 2009 年和 2010 年至 2016 年期间,确定女性第一作者和资深作者的比例。在 2000 年至 2009 年期间首次发表论文的作者被纳入了关于论文数量和任职时间(在首次发表后的 5 年内是否发表了额外的文章)的额外分析。使用学生 t 检验、卡方分析和 Cochrane-Armitage 趋势检验来确定组间的显著性。

结果

从 1978 年到 2016 年,五个与脊柱相关的期刊共发表了 28882 篇原始研究文章。共有 24334 篇摘要(90.9%)列出了第一名字,总共确定了 120723 名作者,其中 100286 名作者成功匹配到性别。总共确定了 33480 名独特的作者(女性作者:31.8%)。女性第一作者和资深作者的代表性从 1978 年至 1994 年的 6.5%和 4.7%增加到 2010 年至 2016 年的 18.5%和 13.6%(p<.001)。2000 年后,女性资深作者的代表性增长有所下降(2000-2004 年、2005-2009 年和 2010-2016 年分别为 12.3%、12.9%和 13.5%)。与男性作者相比,女性作者平均发表的文章较少(平均值:2.1 篇与 3.3 篇,p<.001)。在 2000 年至 2009 年期间首次发表的 15304 名作者中,有 3478 名作者(22.7%)在首次发表后的 5 年内继续发表文章。女性作者在首次发表后继续发表文章的可能性较小(女性作者占 15.3%,男性作者占 24.8%,p<.001)。

结论

在过去的 40 年里,女性在学术脊柱研究中的代表性增加了一倍,尽管女性作为资深作者的代表性增长已经趋于平稳。女性医师研究员在 5 年以上继续参与脊柱相关研究的可能性是男性的一半,平均发表的资深作者文章数量是男性的一半。除了招募更多的女性参与研究外,还应努力确定并解决女性医师研究员在研究进展和晋升方面的障碍。

相似文献

1
Gender trends in authorship of spine-related academic literature-a 39-year perspective.脊柱相关学术文献著者的性别趋势——39 年的视角。
Spine J. 2017 Nov;17(11):1749-1754. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.041. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
2
Sex Disparities in Authorship Order of Cardiology Scientific Publications.心脏病学科学出版物作者排序中的性别差异。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Dec;11(12):e005040. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005040.
3
Women in Neurosurgery: Gender Differences in Authorship in High-Impact Neurosurgery Journals through the Last Two Decades.神经外科中的女性:过去二十年高影响力神经外科学期刊中作者署名的性别差异。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jun;138:374-380. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.017. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
4
Gender Differences in the Authorship of Original Research in Pediatric Journals, 2001-2016.2001 - 2016年儿科期刊原创研究作者的性别差异
J Pediatr. 2017 Dec;191:244-249.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.08.044. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
5
Increases in female academic productivity and female mentorship highlight sustained progress in previously identified neurosurgical gender disparities.女性学术产出的增加以及女性导师指导人数的增多突显了在先前已确定的神经外科性别差异方面所取得的持续进展。
Neurosurg Focus. 2021 Mar;50(3):E3. doi: 10.3171/2020.12.FOCUS20939.
6
Neuro-oncology authorship trends in gender since 1944: a systematic review of 14,020 articles from five top-tier academic journals.自 1944 年以来神经肿瘤学作者性别趋势的系统评价:对五个顶级学术期刊的 14020 篇文章的分析。
J Neurosurg. 2022 Nov 25;139(1):1-10. doi: 10.3171/2022.10.JNS221183. Print 2023 Jul 1.
7
Gender Trends in Authorship of Foot and Ankle Academic Literature Over 24 Years.24年间足踝学术文献作者的性别趋势
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Sep;58(5):898-903. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
8
Despite Growing Number of Women Surgeons, Authorship Gender Disparity in Orthopaedic Literature Persists Over 30 Years.尽管女性外科医生的数量不断增加,但在过去 30 多年中,骨科文献的作者性别差异仍然存在。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):1542-1552. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000849.
9
Trends in Gender Disparities in Authorship of Arthroplasty Research.关节置换研究中作者性别差异的趋势。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Dec 2;102(23):e131. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00258.
10
Analysis of authorship trends in vascular surgery demonstrates a sticky surgical floor for women.血管外科领域作者身份趋势分析表明,女性在该外科领域的晋升存在障碍。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1):20-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.228. Epub 2021 Aug 25.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolution of Skull Base Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis Spanning Nearly 125 Years.颅底外科的发展历程:一项跨越近125年的文献计量分析
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2024 Jul 22;86(4):377-394. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788636. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
AO Spine Knowledge Forums Promote Collaboration and Elevate the Impact of Research: A Bibliometric Analysis.AO 脊柱知识论坛促进合作并提升研究影响力:一项文献计量分析。
Global Spine J. 2025 Jun 13:21925682251351012. doi: 10.1177/21925682251351012.
3
The Evolution of Pediatric Spine Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications From 1902 to 2023.
小儿脊柱外科的发展历程:1902年至2023年出版物的文献计量分析
Neurosurg Pract. 2024 Jun 5;5(3):e00092. doi: 10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000092. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Gender and race in neurotrauma: part 1-identifying inequalities in leadership, academics, and clinical trial management.神经创伤中的性别与种族:第1部分——识别领导力、学术及临床试验管理方面的不平等现象
Front Neurol. 2024 Oct 31;15:1383713. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1383713. eCollection 2024.
5
Is There Gender Disparity in Orthopedic Surgery Resident Research Productivity?骨科住院医师的研究产出存在性别差异吗?
HSS J. 2024 May;20(2):274-281. doi: 10.1177/15563316221150934. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
6
Gender Disparity in Authorship Among Orthopaedic Surgery Residents.骨科住院医师署名中的性别差异。
JB JS Open Access. 2024 Jul 23;9(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00061. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
7
A Decade of Global Skull Base Researchers: Authorship Trends from 3,295 Abstracts in the .全球颅底研究人员的十年:来自3295篇摘要的作者趋势
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2023 Feb 7;85(1):44-56. doi: 10.1055/a-2008-2884. eCollection 2024 Feb.
8
A Bibliometric Analysis of the 500 Most Cited Papers in Orthopaedic Oncology.500 篇骨肿瘤外科学高引论文的文献计量学分析
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2024 Jan 18;8(1). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00223. eCollection 2024 Jan 1.
9
Gender Equality in Antiphospholipid Syndrome Publications: A Comprehensive Analysis of First Author Trends.抗磷脂综合征出版物中的性别平等:第一作者趋势的综合分析
Cureus. 2023 Dec 8;15(12):e50186. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50186. eCollection 2023 Dec.
10
Gender authorship trends in spine research publications - Research across different countries from 1976 to 2020.脊柱研究出版物中的性别作者趋势——1976年至2020年不同国家的研究
Brain Spine. 2022 Apr 15;2:100889. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2022.100889. eCollection 2022.