Zawar Ifrah, Quigg Mark, Ghosal Soutik, Punia Vineet, Calle-Lopez Yamile, Manning Carol, Kapur Jaideep
Comprehensive Epilepsy Program, Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VT.
Sleep Center, Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VT.
Ann Neurol. 2025 Feb;97(2):358-368. doi: 10.1002/ana.27125. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
The effects of seizure control on outcomes in persons with dementia (PWD) remain unclear. Our study aimed to investigate the impact of seizure control on mortality, function, cognition, and mood among PWD.
This longitudinal, multicenter study is based on 39 Alzheimer's disease centers (ADCs) in the United States from September 2005 to December 2021. PWD were grouped by seizure status into recurrent (seizures in the past year), remote (prior seizures but none in the past year), and no seizures (controls). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality among seizure groups. We used Weibull survival analysis to assess the mortality risks by seizure status after adjusting for age, sex, education, race, ethnicity, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, degree of cognitive impairment, dominant Alzheimer's disease (AD) mutation, brain trauma, stroke, Parkinson's disease, alcohol abuse, and depression. Cognition (Clinical Dementia Rating), function (physical dependence and nursing home residence), day-to-day activities (Functional Assessment Scores), and mood (Geriatric Depression Scale) were compared among seizure groups after adjusting for dementia duration and age.
Among 26,501 participants, 374 (1.4%) had recurrent seizures and 510 (1.9%) had remote seizures. In multivariable survival analysis, recurrent seizures were associated with a higher mortality risk than remote and no seizures (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 95% confidence interval [95% CI]; recurrent aHR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.51 to 2.12; remote aHR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.38). Median time-to-death for recurrent, remote, and no seizures was 2.4, 4.0, and 4.7 years, respectively. People with recurrent seizures had worse cognition, day-to-day function, and physical dependence than those with remote seizures and controls.
PWD with poorly controlled recurrent seizures have worse mortality, functional, and cognitive outcomes than PWD with remote and no seizures. These findings underscore the need for timely identification and management of ongoing seizures in PWD. ANN NEUROL 2025;97:358-368.
癫痫控制对痴呆患者(PWD)预后的影响尚不清楚。我们的研究旨在调查癫痫控制对PWD的死亡率、功能、认知和情绪的影响。
这项纵向多中心研究基于2005年9月至2021年12月美国的39个阿尔茨海默病中心(ADC)。PWD根据癫痫发作状态分为复发组(过去一年有癫痫发作)、既往发作组(既往有癫痫发作但过去一年无发作)和无癫痫发作组(对照组)。主要结局是癫痫发作组的全因死亡率。我们使用威布尔生存分析在调整年龄、性别、教育程度、种族、民族、高血压、糖尿病、高脂血症、认知障碍程度、主要阿尔茨海默病(AD)突变、脑外伤、中风、帕金森病、酒精滥用后评估癫痫发作状态的死亡风险。在调整痴呆持续时间和年龄后,比较癫痫发作组之间的认知(临床痴呆评定量表)、功能(身体依赖和养老院居住情况)、日常活动(功能评估得分)和情绪(老年抑郁量表)。
在26,501名参与者中,374人(1.4%)有复发癫痫发作,510人(1.9%)有既往癫痫发作。在多变量生存分析中,复发癫痫发作与比既往发作组和无癫痫发作组更高的死亡风险相关(调整后风险比[aHR],95%置信区间[95%CI];复发aHR = 1.79,95%CI = 1.51至2.12;既往发作aHR = 1.17,95%CI = 0.98至1.38)。复发、既往发作和无癫痫发作组的中位死亡时间分别为2.4年、4.0年和4.7年。复发癫痫发作的人比既往发作组和对照组的人有更差的认知、日常功能和身体依赖。
癫痫发作控制不佳的PWD比既往发作组和无癫痫发作组的PWD有更差的死亡率、功能和认知结局。这些发现强调了及时识别和管理PWD中正在发作的癫痫的必要性。《神经病学年鉴》2025年;97:358 - 368。