Wueppenhorst Karoline, Alkassab Abdulrahim T, Beims Hannes, Bischoff Gabriela, Ernst Ulrich, Friedrich Elsa, Illies Ingrid, Janke Martina, Kehmstedt Julia, Kirchner Wolfgang H, Odemer Richard, Erler Silvio
Julius Kühn-Institute, Institute for Bee Protection, Messeweg 11-12, 38104 Braunschweig, Germany; Technische Universität Braunschweig, Zoological Institute, Mendelssohnstraße 4, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany.
Julius Kühn-Institute, Institute for Bee Protection, Messeweg 11-12, 38104 Braunschweig, Germany.
Curr Biol. 2024 Dec 2;34(23):5570-5577.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.10.008. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
Residues of plant protection products (PPPs) are frequently detected in bee matrices due to foraging bees collecting contaminated nectar and pollen, which they bring back to their hive. The collected material is further used by nurse bees to produce glandular secretions for feeding their larvae. Potential exposure to PPPs occurs through direct oral ingestion, contact during foraging, or interaction with contaminated hive material. Contaminants can pose health risks to adult worker bees, queens, drones (males), or larvae, potentially impacting colony health and productivity. However, residue concentrations can vary significantly between analyzed matrices, and potential accumulation or dilution steps have not been widely investigated. Although research has provided valuable insights into contamination risks, there remain gaps in our understanding of the entire pathway from field, via foragers, stored products, nurse bees, and finally to food jelly, i.e., royal, worker, and drone jelly, and the larvae, including all possible processing steps. We collected samples of bee-relevant matrices following the in-field spray application of the product Pictor Active, containing the fungicides boscalid and pyraclostrobin. The samples were analyzed for residues along this entire pathway. Fungicide residues were reduced by a factor of 8-80 from stored product to nurse bees' heads, suggesting a filtering function of nurse bees. Furthermore, detected residues in larval food jelly resulted from added pollen and not from nurse bee secretions. Calculated risk quotients were at least twice as low as the threshold values, suggesting a low risk to honey bee colonies from these fungicides at the tested application rate.
由于觅食的蜜蜂采集了受污染的花蜜和花粉并带回蜂巢,因此在蜜蜂样本中经常检测到植物保护产品(PPP)的残留。采集到的物质会被保育蜂进一步用于分泌腺体分泌物来喂养幼虫。蜜蜂可能通过直接口服摄入、觅食时接触或与受污染的蜂巢材料相互作用而接触到PPP。污染物可能会对成年工蜂、蜂王、雄蜂或幼虫构成健康风险,进而可能影响蜂群的健康和生产力。然而,分析的样本中残留浓度可能有很大差异,且潜在的积累或稀释过程尚未得到广泛研究。尽管已有研究对污染风险提供了有价值的见解,但我们对从田间,经觅食蜂、储存产品、保育蜂,最终到蜂王浆、工蜂浆和雄蜂浆以及幼虫的整个路径,包括所有可能的加工步骤的理解仍存在空白。我们在田间喷洒含有杀菌剂啶酰菌胺和吡唑醚菌酯的产品Pictor Active后,采集了与蜜蜂相关的样本。对这些样本在整个路径上的残留进行了分析。从储存产品到保育蜂头部,杀菌剂残留量降低了8至80倍,这表明保育蜂具有过滤功能。此外,在幼虫食物浆中检测到的残留来自添加的花粉,而非保育蜂的分泌物。计算得出的风险商数至少比阈值低两倍,这表明在测试的施用量下,这些杀菌剂对蜂群的风险较低。