Xiang Yongqi, Yang Jingjie, Huang Zhongxuan, Zhang Xin, Duan Haotian, Yu Anwei, Yang Huiqin, Fan Chuan, Chen Gang, Li Xianwei
College of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
College of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China; National Forestry and Grassland Administration Key Laboratory of Forest Resources Conservation and Ecological Safety on the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River & Forestry Ecological Engineering in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 611130, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Dec 20;957:177293. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177293. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
Mixed forests generally have a higher carbon sequestration potential than pure forests. However, the effects of different types of mixed afforestation on soil organic carbon (SOC) and its labile fractions still remain controversial. We examined the concentrations of each SOC labile fraction at 0-50 cm soil depth, understory plant communities, stand plant biomass and studied their integrated effects on soil carbon stocks in three types of Pinus massoniana afforestation: a monoculture (MPF), a mixed forest with Cunninghamia lanceolata (MCLMF) and a mixed forest with Liquidambar formosana (MLMF). The results showed that the SOC stocks, i.e., concentrations of SOC and its labile fractions, across soil depths in all three afforestation types decreased with soil depth and ranked in the following order: MCLMF > MPF > MLMF. The concentrations of SOC and its labile fractions displayed a significant positive correlation with the diversity and biomass of understory plants and a significant negative correlation with tree biomass. The MCLMF had the largest SOC stocks (83.45 ± 7.59 Mg ha) and the smallest aboveground plant biomass carbon stocks (85.2 ± 4.07 Mg ha), while those of the MLMF were the opposite (SOC stocks, 35.63 ± 4.47 Mg ha; plant biomass carbon stocks, 144.28 ± 1.19 Mg ha). The forest carbon stocks (comprising both SOC and plant biomass carbon pools) were ranked as MLMF > MCLMF > MPF. Our results revealed that the diversity and biomass of understory plants can improve the stocks of SOC and its labile fractions, whereas trees may weaken the role of understory plants. In this sense, the diversity and biomass of understory plants should be emphasized in the process of mixed afforestation, especially mixed broadleaf-conifer afforestation, to increase SOC sequestration.
混交林通常比纯林具有更高的碳固存潜力。然而,不同类型的混交造林对土壤有机碳(SOC)及其活性组分的影响仍存在争议。我们研究了三种马尾松造林类型(纯林(MPF)、与杉木混交的混交林(MCLMF)和与枫香混交的混交林(MLMF))在0 - 50厘米土壤深度下各SOC活性组分的浓度、林下植物群落、林分植物生物量,并研究了它们对土壤碳储量的综合影响。结果表明,所有三种造林类型不同土壤深度的SOC储量,即SOC及其活性组分的浓度,均随土壤深度的增加而降低,排序如下:MCLMF > MPF > MLMF。SOC及其活性组分的浓度与林下植物的多样性和生物量呈显著正相关,与树木生物量呈显著负相关。MCLMF的SOC储量最大(83.45 ± 7.59 Mg ha),地上植物生物量碳储量最小(85.2 ± 4.07 Mg ha),而MLMF则相反(SOC储量,35.63 ± 4.47 Mg ha;植物生物量碳储量,144.28 ± 1.19 Mg ha)。森林碳储量(包括SOC和植物生物量碳库)排序为MLMF > MCLMF > MPF。我们的结果表明,林下植物的多样性和生物量可以提高SOC及其活性组分的储量,而树木可能会削弱林下植物的作用。从这个意义上说,在混交造林过程中,尤其是针阔混交造林过程中,应强调林下植物的多样性和生物量,以增加SOC固存。