Xiao Ye, Zhang Yuguang, Long Jiumei, Luo Kang, Huang Zhigang
Department of Resources and Environment, Zunyi Normal College, Zunyi, China.
Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China.
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 25;20(2):e0318195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318195. eCollection 2025.
Soil organic carbon (SOC) is an important index for evaluating soil quality in the process of ecological restoration. It plays an important role in increasing soil carbon storage, improving soil texture, and promoting plant growth. Nevertheless, dating the variation in SOC and labile SOC fractions (LOCFs) during ecological restoration processes has not been sufficiently elucidated. To enrich our comprehension of the responses of SOC and its labile fractions to different vegetation restoration types, five vegetation restoration types were selected in the Danxia landform region of southwest China, namely, shrub (SH), bamboo forest (BF), Chinese fir forest (CFF), evergreen broad-leaved forest (EBF), and mixed coniferous-broadleaf forest (MCBF). The concentrations and stocks of SOC and LOCFs, such as dissolved organic carbon (DOC), microbial biomass organic carbon (MBC), and easily oxidizable organic carbon (EOC), and the carbon pool management index (CPMI) were investigated. Results showed that the different vegetation restoration types significantly influenced SOC stocks (P < 0.05), and the concentrations and stocks of SOC and LOCFs decreased with increasing soil depth in different vegetation types, except for MBC in BF and CFF. Additionally, BF and EBF had significantly higher total SOC stocks (92.75 t ha - 1 and 60.13 t ha - 1) compared with the three other vegetation types (26.18-47.48 t ha-1) at a depth of 0-30 cm. The largest total DOC stock was observed in EBF, while BF and EBF had significantly higher MBC and EOC stocks than SH, CFF, and MCBF (P < 0.05). Compared with SH, the CPMI increased by 49.7%, 32.9%, and 35.2% in BF, CFF, and EBF, respectively, except for the MCBF. SOC and LOCFs were closely related to soil physicochemical properties, and total nitrogen, total phosphorus and moisture had a pronounced effect on them. However, higher SOC and LOCFs stocks, and CPMI were observed in BF and EBF than in the other vegetation types. This result suggests that the two plant types exhibited better ability to sequester carbon than the other vegetation types. Overall, vegetation restoration promoted the accumulation of both SOC and its fractions, the results of which varied among the different vegetation types.
土壤有机碳(SOC)是生态恢复过程中评估土壤质量的重要指标。它在增加土壤碳储量、改善土壤质地和促进植物生长方面发挥着重要作用。然而,生态恢复过程中SOC和活性有机碳组分(LOCFs)的变化年代测定尚未得到充分阐明。为了丰富我们对SOC及其活性组分对不同植被恢复类型响应的理解,在中国西南部丹霞地貌区选择了五种植被恢复类型,即灌木林(SH)、竹林(BF)、杉木林(CFF)、常绿阔叶林(EBF)和针阔混交林(MCBF)。研究了SOC和LOCFs的浓度与储量,如溶解有机碳(DOC)、微生物量有机碳(MBC)和易氧化有机碳(EOC),以及碳库管理指数(CPMI)。结果表明,不同植被恢复类型对SOC储量有显著影响(P < 0.05),不同植被类型中SOC和LOCFs的浓度与储量随土壤深度增加而降低,但BF和CFF中的MBC除外。此外,在0 - 30 cm深度处,BF和EBF的总SOC储量显著高于其他三种植被类型(26.18 - 47.48 t ha-1),分别为92.75 t ha - 1和60. t ha - 1。EBF中DOC总储量最大,而BF和EBF的MBC和EOC储量显著高于SH、CFF和MCBF(P < 0.05)。与SH相比,BF、CFF和EBF中的CPMI分别增加了49.7%、32.9%和35.2%,MCBF除外。SOC和LOCFs与土壤理化性质密切相关,全氮、全磷和水分对它们有显著影响。然而,BF和EBF中的SOC和LOCFs储量以及CPMI高于其他植被类型。这一结果表明,这两种植物类型比其他植被类型表现出更好的碳固存能力。总体而言,植被恢复促进了SOC及其组分的积累,不同植被类型的结果有所不同。