• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调查一项多组分积极参与式组织干预对新西兰急诊科员工职业倦怠的影响:一项前瞻性、多地点、前后对照、混合方法研究。

Investigating the impact of a multicomponent positive participatory organisational intervention on burnout in New Zealand emergency department staff: a prospective, multisite, before and after, mixed methods study.

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Adult Emergency Department, Te Toka Tumai Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 29;14(10):e087328. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087328.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087328
PMID:39477263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11529577/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The well-being of healthcare workers (HCWs) is critical to providing excellent care. Recent evidence concerns the well-being of emergency department (ED) HCWs in New Zealand, with high levels of burnout found in a 2020 survey. This threat to providing high-quality acute care warrants improvement interventions. The causes of burnout are complex and multifactorial, the solutions are not straightforward.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A prospective, multisite, before and after, mixed methods study assessing a multicomponent intervention, adaptable to local context, that targets three organisation levels (the individual, the group and the system levels) and meaningfully involves frontline HCWs may reduce HCW burnout and improve HCW well-being. Individual HCWs will choose from three individual-level psychological interventions and participate in those most appropriate for them. Local champions will decide which group-level intervention their ED will use. The system-level intervention will build capacity and capability for quality improvement (QI) with QI training and the establishment of a Quality Improvement Learning System. This system-level intervention has several important features that may ultimately empower HCWs to contribute to improving the quality of ED healthcare.We will enrol nine EDs, from which there will be at least 900 HCW participants. EDs will be enrolled in three waves from March 2023 to April 2024, with interventions taking place in each ED over 12 months.Methods of assessment will include baseline and repeat survey measures of burnout and well-being. Process evaluation at each ED will provide details of context, the intervention and the fidelity of the implementation.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics committee approval was provided, with locality approval at each site.Individual site feedback will be provided to each ED and executive leadership. Dissemination of findings will be through publication in peer-reviewed journals, presentation at national and international scientific meetings and through national healthcare quality bodies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12623000342617).

摘要

简介

医护人员(HCWs)的福祉对于提供卓越的医疗至关重要。最近的证据涉及新西兰急诊科(ED)HCWs 的福祉,2020 年的一项调查发现他们的 burnout 水平很高。这种对提供高质量急症护理的威胁需要进行改善干预。burnout 的原因复杂且多因素,解决方案并不简单。

方法和分析

一项前瞻性、多地点、前后对照、混合方法研究评估了一种多组分干预措施,该措施适应于当地情况,针对三个组织层面(个体、群体和系统层面),并让一线 HCWs 有意义地参与其中,可能会降低 HCW 的 burnout 程度并提高 HCW 的福祉。个体 HCWs 将从三种个体层面的心理干预措施中进行选择,并参与最适合他们的干预措施。当地的领导者将决定他们的 ED 将使用哪种群体层面的干预措施。系统层面的干预措施将通过 QI 培训和建立质量改进学习系统来提高能力和能力。该系统层面的干预措施具有几个重要的特点,最终可能会赋予 HCWs 权力,使他们能够为改善 ED 医疗保健质量做出贡献。我们将招募 9 个 ED,每个 ED 将至少有 900 名 HCW 参与者。ED 将在 2023 年 3 月至 2024 年 4 月期间分三批招募,每个 ED 的干预措施将持续 12 个月。评估方法将包括基线和重复调查 burnout 和福祉的测量。每个 ED 的过程评估将提供有关背景、干预措施和实施保真度的详细信息。

伦理和传播

已获得伦理委员会的批准,并获得了每个地点的地方批准。每个 ED 将获得当地的反馈和执行领导。研究结果将通过在同行评议的期刊上发表、在国家和国际科学会议上展示以及通过国家医疗保健质量机构进行传播。

试验注册号

澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12623000342617)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96bb/11529577/5415a5b0c85a/bmjopen-14-10-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96bb/11529577/11df7d7a622d/bmjopen-14-10-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96bb/11529577/5415a5b0c85a/bmjopen-14-10-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96bb/11529577/11df7d7a622d/bmjopen-14-10-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96bb/11529577/5415a5b0c85a/bmjopen-14-10-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Investigating the impact of a multicomponent positive participatory organisational intervention on burnout in New Zealand emergency department staff: a prospective, multisite, before and after, mixed methods study.调查一项多组分积极参与式组织干预对新西兰急诊科员工职业倦怠的影响:一项前瞻性、多地点、前后对照、混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 29;14(10):e087328. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087328.
2
Leadership communication, stress, and burnout among frontline emergency department staff amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods approach.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,一线急诊部门员工的领导力沟通、压力和倦怠:混合方法研究。
Healthc (Amst). 2021 Dec;9(4):100577. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100577. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
3
Workplace wellbeing in emergency departments in Aotearoa New Zealand 2020.新西兰奥克兰地区 2020 年急诊科工作场所的健康状况。
N Z Med J. 2021 Sep 3;134(1541):96-110.
4
Interventions to support the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic: a mixed methods systematic review.在疾病爆发、流行或大流行期间及之后,为支持一线卫生和社会护理专业人员的适应能力和心理健康所采取的干预措施:一项混合方法的系统评价
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 5;11(11):CD013779. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013779.
5
Effects of work conditions on provider mental well-being and quality of care: a mixed-methods intervention study in the emergency department.工作条件对医护人员心理健康和护理质量的影响:急诊科的一项混合方法干预研究
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Jan 3;19(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12873-018-0218-x.
6
EMDR for symptoms of depression, stress and burnout in health care workers exposed to COVID-19 (HARD): A study protocol for a trial within a cohort study.针对 COVID-19 暴露医护人员的抑郁、压力和倦怠症状的 EMDR(HARD):一项队列研究内试验的研究方案。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(1):2179569. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2179569.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Workplace wellbeing in an urban emergency department in Aotearoa New Zealand.新西兰奥克兰市一城区急诊部的工作场所健康。
Emerg Med Australas. 2019 Aug;31(4):619-625. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13262. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
10
Feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of a positive emotion regulation intervention to promote resilience for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A randomized controlled trial.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,促进医疗工作者韧性的积极情绪调节干预措施的可行性、可接受性和有效性:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 24;19(6):e0305172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305172. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Overcoming the 'self-limiting' nature of QI: can we improve the quality of patient care while caring for staff?克服质量改进的“自我限制”性质:在关爱员工的同时,我们能否提高患者护理质量?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Dec;31(12):857-859. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015272. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
2
Stop asking if it works, start making it happen: exploring barriers to clinical event debriefing in the ED.停止询问其是否有效,开始让它成为现实:探索急诊科临床事件汇报的障碍。
CJEM. 2022 Nov;24(7):673-674. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00396-9. Epub 2022 Oct 24.
3
Interprofessional clinical event debriefing-does it make a difference? Attitudes of emergency department care providers to INFO clinical event debriefings.
跨专业临床事件汇报——有区别吗?急诊医护人员对 INFO 临床事件汇报的态度。
CJEM. 2022 Nov;24(7):695-701. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00361-6. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
4
Health Care Workers' Need for Headspace: Findings From a Multisite Definitive Randomized Controlled Trial of an Unguided Digital Mindfulness-Based Self-help App to Reduce Healthcare Worker Stress.医护人员的心理空间需求:一项多中心确定随机对照试验的研究结果,该试验评估了一种非指导性的数字正念自助应用程序对减少医护人员压力的效果。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Aug 25;10(8):e31744. doi: 10.2196/31744.
5
Internet-delivered cognitive behavioral interventions to reduce elevated stress: A systematic review and meta-analysis.通过互联网提供的认知行为干预以减轻压力升高:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Internet Interv. 2022 Jun 22;29:100553. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100553. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Context in Implementation Science.实施科学中的背景
Pediatrics. 2022 Mar 1;149(Suppl 3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-045948C.
7
The "3R Team" in action! Implementation of a program of learning from excellence in a neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit in France.“3R 团队”在行动!在法国新生儿和儿科重症监护病房实施卓越学习计划。
Arch Pediatr. 2022 Apr;29(3):225-229. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
8
Physician Well-being 2.0: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?医生健康 2.0:我们在哪里,我们要去哪里?
Mayo Clin Proc. 2021 Oct;96(10):2682-2693. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.06.005.
9
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
10
Workplace wellbeing in emergency departments in Aotearoa New Zealand 2020.新西兰奥克兰地区 2020 年急诊科工作场所的健康状况。
N Z Med J. 2021 Sep 3;134(1541):96-110.