Bouthour Walid, Bruce Beau B, Newman Nancy J, Biousse Valérie
Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Service of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Eye (Lond). 2025 Jan;39(1):185-191. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03408-3. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to compare factors associated with poor versus good visual outcomes in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) patients with severe papilledema at initial presentation.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: Retrospective review of consecutive IIH patients (1/1/2013-6/10/2023) with severe papilledema (Frisén grade 4-5 and/or atrophy in at least one eye); Patients were divided into "poor visual outcome" (poor visual acuity and constricted visual field in at least one eye) and "good visual outcome" (good visual acuity and only mild visual field changes in both eyes) at >6 months for medically-treated patients and >3 months follow-up for surgically-treated patients.
We included 134 IIH patients with severe papilledema (70 had poor and 64 had good visual outcomes). No significant differences existed for age, gender, race, hypertension, haemoglobin, or cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure. The poor-outcome group had significantly greater BMI (mean 39.2 vs 35.1 kg/m, p = 0.004), and worse initial HVF-MD (-20.04 vs -5.81 dB, p < 0.0001). Poor-outcome patients saw more prior health-care providers (4.7 vs 2.4, p < 0.0001), with delayed neuro-ophthalmology encounters (58.5 vs 15.2 weeks, p = 0.001). 41.4% of poor-outcome patients were initially seen in outside emergency departments (ED) (vs 14.1% of good-outcome patients, p = 0.0005), while only 27.1% were seen by eye-care providers (vs 53.1% of good-outcome patients, p = 0.0027). No poor-outcome patients initially consulted our institution's ED vs 7.8% of good-outcome patients.
Although patients with poor visual outcome did not seek medical care later than good outcome patients, they had delayed diagnosis/treatment because of prior outside ED visits and lack of prior eye-care provider evaluations, suggesting that early diagnosis and specialized management of papilledema is essential for patients with symptoms of intracranial hypertension.
背景/目的:我们的目的是比较特发性颅内高压(IIH)患者初诊时伴有严重视乳头水肿,其视力预后差与预后良好相关的因素。
受试者/方法:对连续性IIH患者(2013年1月1日至2023年10月6日)进行回顾性研究,这些患者伴有严重视乳头水肿(Frién分级4 - 5级和/或至少一只眼睛萎缩);对于接受药物治疗的患者,在6个月以上将患者分为“视力预后差”(至少一只眼睛视力差和视野缩小)和“视力预后良好”(双眼视力良好且仅伴有轻度视野改变),对于接受手术治疗的患者,随访3个月以上进行分组。
我们纳入了134例伴有严重视乳头水肿的IIH患者(70例视力预后差,64例视力预后良好)。在年龄、性别、种族、高血压、血红蛋白或脑脊液开放压方面不存在显著差异。视力预后差的组BMI显著更高(平均39.2 vs 35.1kg/m²,p = 0.004),初始HVF - MD更差(-20.04 vs -5.81dB,p < 0.0001)。视力预后差的患者此前看过更多的医疗服务提供者(4.7 vs 2.4,p < 0.0001),神经眼科会诊延迟(58.5 vs 15.2周,p = 0.001)。41.4%视力预后差的患者最初是在外部急诊科就诊(而视力预后良好的患者为14.1%,p = 0.0005),而只有27.1%的患者由眼科护理人员诊治(视力预后良好的患者为53.1%,p = 0.0027)。没有视力预后差的患者最初在我们机构的急诊科就诊,而视力预后良好患者的这一比例为7.8%。
虽然视力预后差的患者并不比视力预后良好的患者更晚寻求医疗护理,但由于此前在外部急诊科就诊以及缺乏眼科护理人员的评估,他们的诊断/治疗有所延迟,这表明对视乳头水肿进行早期诊断和专业管理对于颅内高压症状患者至关重要。