Anaesthesia and Critical Care Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Division of Emergency Medical Services, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 31;24(1):1320. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11827-x.
Early diagnosis and antibiotic therapy in patients with sepsis reduce morbidity and mortality, thus pre-hospital management is likely to affect patient outcomes. Pre-hospital administration may increase the risk of unnecessary use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, but identification of an infectious focus enables more targeted antibiotic therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate how paramedics, with or without the assistance of general practitioners, can administer empiric intravenous antibiotic treatment against sepsis in a timely manner.
Cohort study of patients with suspected sepsis that received pre-hospital intravenous antibiotics and were transported to hospital. The setting was mainly rural with long average distance to hospital. Patients received targeted antibiotic treatment after an assessment based on clinical work-up supported by scoring systems. Patients were prospectively included from May 2018 to August 2022. Results are presented as median or absolute values, and chi-square tests were used to compare categorical data.
We included 328 patients. Median age was 76 years (IQR 64, 83) and 48.5% of patients were female. 30-days all-cause mortality was 10.4%. In cases where a suspected infectious focus was determined, the hospital discharge papers confirmed the pre-hospital diagnosis focus in 195 cases (79.3%). The presence of a general practitioner during the pre-hospital assessment increased the rate of correctly identified infectious focus from 72.6% to 86.1% (p = 0.009). Concordance between pre-hospital identification of a tentative focus and discharge diagnosis was highest for lower respiratory tract (p = 0.02) and urinary tract infections (p = 0.03). Antibiotic treatment was initiated 44 min (median) after arrival of ambulance, and median transportation time to hospital was 69 min. Antibiotic therapy was started 76 min (median) before arrival at hospital.
Pre-hospital identification of infectious focus in suspected sepsis was feasible, and collaboration with primary care physicians increased level of diagnostic accuracy. This allowed initiation of intravenous focus-directed antibiotics more than one hour before arrival in hospital in a rural setting. The effect of pre-hospital therapy on timing was much stronger than in previous studies from more urban areas.
在脓毒症患者中进行早期诊断和抗生素治疗可以降低发病率和死亡率,因此院前管理可能会影响患者的预后。院前给药可能会增加不必要地使用广谱抗生素的风险,但确定感染灶可以使抗生素治疗更有针对性。本研究旨在调查在没有或有全科医生协助的情况下,护理人员如何及时对脓毒症患者进行经验性静脉内抗生素治疗。
这是一项对接受院前静脉内抗生素治疗并被送往医院的疑似脓毒症患者的队列研究。该研究的设置主要在农村地区,到医院的平均距离较长。患者在根据临床检查支持的评分系统进行评估后接受靶向抗生素治疗。患者于 2018 年 5 月至 2022 年 8 月期间前瞻性纳入。结果以中位数或绝对值表示,采用卡方检验比较分类数据。
我们共纳入 328 例患者。中位年龄为 76 岁(IQR 64, 83),48.5%的患者为女性。30 天全因死亡率为 10.4%。在确定疑似感染灶的情况下,195 例(79.3%)出院病历证实了院前诊断的感染灶。在院前评估时存在全科医生可将正确识别感染灶的比例从 72.6%提高到 86.1%(p=0.009)。下呼吸道(p=0.02)和尿路感染(p=0.03)的院前暂定焦点识别与出院诊断的一致性最高。救护车到达后 44 分钟(中位数)开始使用抗生素,中位数转运至医院的时间为 69 分钟。抗生素治疗在到达医院前 76 分钟(中位数)开始。
在疑似脓毒症中,院前确定感染灶是可行的,与初级保健医生合作可提高诊断准确性。这使得在农村地区能够在到达医院前一个多小时开始静脉内靶向抗生素治疗。院前治疗对时间的影响比以前来自城市地区的研究要强得多。