Orthopaedic Department, Trondheim University Hospital, Post-box 3250 Torgarden, Trondheim, 7006, Norway.
Department of Health Sciences Aalesund, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Post-box 1517, Aalesund, NO-6025, Norway.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Oct 30;19(1):704. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05203-y.
This study evaluates the clinical evidence for performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without a tourniquet, a shift from the near-universal use in 2009 to current trends towards tourniquet-less TKA in Norway and Sweden. This change is set against a backdrop of conflicting evidence regarding the positive and negative effects of tourniquet use.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The aims were to determine if the tourniquet has an impact on [1] Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) at 8 weeks after surgery; [2] postoperative strength and function; [3] postoperative pain and opioid analgesic use; and [4] operative time, bleeding, and length of stay (LOS).
Eighty-one patients were randomised to TKA with or without a tourniquet. The outcome measures, FJS-12, muscle strength, functional test, pain, estimated blood loss, haemoglobin (Hb) loss, knee circumference, opioid consumption, and LOS were assessed preoperatively and at 1 day, 8 weeks, and 1 year after surgery.
No significant difference in FJS-12 scores was found between the two groups at postoperative 8 weeks. However, the tourniquet group showed statistically significant better knee extension strength at 8 weeks (p = 0.045). There were no differences in other outcomes, except for a greater decrease in haemoglobin levels (p = 0.02) and higher estimated perioperative blood loss (p < 0.001) in the no tourniquet group than the torniquet group.
Our study indicates that tourniquet use during TKA causes no significant differences in FJS-12 at 8 weeks, significantly reduces bleeding and postoperative Hb loss, and improves quadriceps strength at 8 weeks.
Clinicaltrails.gov. Registry Number: NCT03666598. Registered 30 August 2018.
本研究评估了在膝关节置换术(TKA)中不使用止血带的临床证据,这与 2009 年几乎普遍使用止血带的情况形成对比,目前挪威和瑞典的趋势是采用无止血带 TKA。这种变化的背景是关于止血带使用的积极和消极影响存在相互矛盾的证据。
问题/目的:目的是确定止血带是否会对[1]术后 8 周的遗忘关节评分-12 分(FJS-12);[2]术后力量和功能;[3]术后疼痛和阿片类镇痛药使用;以及[4]手术时间、出血和住院时间(LOS)产生影响。
81 例患者被随机分为使用或不使用止血带的 TKA。术前和术后 1 天、8 周和 1 年评估 FJS-12、肌肉力量、功能测试、疼痛、估计失血量、血红蛋白(Hb)丢失、膝关节周径、阿片类药物消耗和 LOS。
术后 8 周时,两组 FJS-12 评分无显著差异。然而,止血带组在 8 周时膝关节伸展力量有统计学上的显著改善(p=0.045)。除了无止血带组的血红蛋白水平下降(p=0.02)和估计围手术期失血增加(p<0.001)外,其他结果均无差异。
我们的研究表明,TKA 中使用止血带在 8 周时不会导致 FJS-12 显著差异,显著减少出血和术后 Hb 丢失,并在 8 周时改善股四头肌力量。
Clinicaltrials.gov。注册号:NCT03666598。注册日期:2018 年 8 月 30 日。