Suppr超能文献

目标框架和风险认知对数字防洪工具可接受性的影响。

The effect of goal frame and risk perception on digital flood prevention tool acceptability.

作者信息

Jezierski Théo, Ragot-Court Isabelle, Weiss Karine

机构信息

Laboratory CHROME, Université de Nîmes, Nîmes, France.

Laboratory LMA, Université Gustave-Eiffel, Salon-de-Provence, France.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 18;15:1454078. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1454078. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To cope with catastrophic floods, people need to be better prepared. In this context, a self-assessment digital tool for habitat vulnerability was developed. To improve its take-up rate, we are looking at the motivations associated with the social acceptability of this tool. The motivations (hedonic-gain-normative), derived from goal-frame theory, as well as elements relating to risk perception, are tested.

METHOD

One, 688 participants (aged between 18 and 87) first read a scenario presenting the application (reflecting either one of the motivations of the Goal Framing Theory or a control scenario with no motivation). After reading one of the scenarios, they completed an online questionnaire, measuring the acceptability of the tool using three measures: a direct one (items from the Technological Acceptability Model: ease of use, perceived usefulness and social influence), an indirect measure (by asking the percentage of neighbours interested in the tool) and a social measure (judgement of a person using the tool). The last part of the questionnaire was about subjects' risk perception.

RESULTS

The analyses show that, of all the scenarios, the one involving hedonic motivation leads to the lowest social acceptance of the tool. We also observe that a better risk perception predicts better tool acceptability. Finally, we observe interaction effects between risk perception and motivations, showing that normative motivation is better when risk perception increases and that the control condition is better when risk perception decreases.

DISCUSSION

Goal framing theory is usually used for ecological behaviors. It also appears here as relevant in the field of risk prevention. Although risk perception remains the best predictor of acceptability, these results lead us to conclude that hedonic motivation is not appropriate for the acceptability of a flood risk prevention tool. It is preferable to focus on normative and gain motivations.

摘要

引言

为应对灾难性洪水,人们需要做好更充分的准备。在此背景下,开发了一种用于栖息地脆弱性的自我评估数字工具。为提高其使用率,我们正在研究与该工具的社会可接受性相关的动机。源自目标框架理论的动机(享乐收益规范)以及与风险认知相关的因素都进行了测试。

方法

688名参与者(年龄在18至87岁之间)首先阅读一个描述该应用程序的情景(反映目标框架理论的动机之一或无动机的对照情景)。阅读其中一个情景后,他们完成了一份在线问卷,使用三种度量来衡量该工具的可接受性:一种直接度量(来自技术接受模型的项目:易用性、感知有用性和社会影响)、一种间接度量(通过询问对该工具感兴趣的邻居的百分比)和一种社会度量(对使用该工具的人的评判)。问卷的最后一部分是关于受试者的风险认知。

结果

分析表明,在所有情景中,涉及享乐动机的情景导致该工具的社会接受度最低。我们还观察到,更好的风险认知预示着更好的工具可接受性。最后,我们观察到风险认知与动机之间的交互作用,表明当风险认知增加时,规范动机效果更好,而当风险认知降低时,对照条件更好。

讨论

目标框架理论通常用于生态行为。在此它在风险预防领域似乎也具有相关性。尽管风险认知仍然是可接受性的最佳预测指标,但这些结果使我们得出结论,享乐动机不适用于洪水风险预防工具的可接受性。最好关注规范动机和收益动机。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb4c/11524046/1573ace5b239/fpsyg-15-1454078-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验