Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute (MRC/UVRI) and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 29;17(7):e0271104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271104. eCollection 2022.
Daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use is highly effective against HIV infection. However, the uptake of PrEP among individuals at high-risk of HIV acquisition in sub-Saharan Africa varies because of availability and acceptability. We assessed the acceptability of PrEP among participants in a prospective HIV vaccine preparedness study in Masaka, southwestern Uganda.
From November 2018 to August 2019, 20 participants (10 female) were purposively selected for in-depth interviews (IDIs) at 3 and 9 months' post-enrolment in the vaccine preparedness study. Four focus group discussions (FGD) (two among men) were conducted with 29 individuals categorized as: younger (18-24 years) men, younger (18-24 years) women, older (≥30 years) men, and older (≥30 years) women. Apart from IDI specific questions on recent life history including work experience, relationship history and places lived, topics for IDIs and FGDs included knowledge of HIV, perceptions of HIV risk (including own risk), knowledge of and use of PrEP. The Theoretical Framework of Acceptability was used to structure a thematic framework approach for data analysis.
Participants understood that PrEP was an oral pill taken daily by HIV negative individuals to prevent acquisition of HIV. Overall, interest in and acceptability of PrEP was high, more than half expressed positivity towards PrEP but were not ready to initiate taking it citing the burden of daily oral pill taking, related side effects, stigma and distrust of PrEP. Fourteen participants (from IDI and FGD) initiated PrEP, although some (one FGD and two IDI participants) stopped taking it due to side effects or perceived reduced risk.
We observed a keen interest in PrEP initiation among our study participants. However, a limited understanding of PrEP and associated concerns impeded uptake and sustained use. Hence, interventions are needed to address end-user challenges to increase uptake and support adherence.
每日口服暴露前预防(PrEP)对 HIV 感染具有高度有效性。然而,由于可及性和可接受性的原因,撒哈拉以南非洲地区 HIV 高风险人群对 PrEP 的使用情况存在差异。我们评估了乌干达西南部马萨卡一项前瞻性 HIV 疫苗准备研究参与者对 PrEP 的可接受性。
2018 年 11 月至 2019 年 8 月,在疫苗准备研究入组后 3 个月和 9 个月时,根据目的抽样选择了 20 名参与者(10 名女性)进行深入访谈(IDI)。对 29 名参与者进行了 4 次焦点小组讨论(FGD)(其中 2 次是男性),这些参与者分为:年轻(18-24 岁)男性、年轻(18-24 岁)女性、年长(≥30 岁)男性和年长(≥30 岁)女性。除了 IDI 关于近期生活史的具体问题,包括工作经历、关系史和居住地点外,IDIs 和 FGD 的主题还包括 HIV 知识、对 HIV 风险的认识(包括自身风险)、对 PrEP 的了解和使用。接受度理论框架被用来构建数据分析的主题框架方法。
参与者了解到 PrEP 是一种由 HIV 阴性个体每日服用的口服药丸,用于预防 HIV 感染。总体而言,对 PrEP 的兴趣和可接受性很高,超过一半的人对 PrEP 表示肯定,但由于每日口服药丸的负担、相关副作用、污名和对 PrEP 的不信任,他们还没有准备好开始服用 PrEP。14 名参与者(来自 IDI 和 FGD)开始服用 PrEP,但由于副作用或认为风险降低,一些参与者(1 个 FGD 和 2 个 IDI 参与者)停止了服用。
我们观察到研究参与者对 PrEP 启动有浓厚的兴趣。然而,对 PrEP 的有限了解和相关问题阻碍了 PrEP 的使用。因此,需要采取干预措施来解决最终用户的挑战,以提高接受度并支持依从性。