• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情、社交媒体、算法与南部非洲本土运动的兴起:活动家、受众及政策制定者的观点

COVID-19, social media, algorithms and the rise of indigenous movements in Southern Africa: perspectives from activists, audiences and policymakers.

作者信息

Foyet Metolo, Child Brian

机构信息

Department of Geography, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

出版信息

Front Sociol. 2024 Oct 16;9:1433998. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1433998. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2024.1433998
PMID:39478954
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11521973/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic, as a holistic event of cultural trauma, significantly influenced social structures and behaviors globally. Under its impact, social movements leveraged digital platforms to sustain and amplify their causes, creating new forms of solidarity and resistance, and fostering a rise in digital and hybrid collective actions. Concurrently, social media thrived as a transformative tool for social change, revolutionizing communication, mobilization, and advocacy. Platforms like WhatsApp and X redefined traditional activism by enabling rapid information dissemination and facilitating global grassroots movements. This technological evolution has provided marginalized communities, including the indigenous peoples of Southern Africa, with a powerful voice. These communities face challenges such as land rights disputes, environmental degradation, and socioeconomic marginalization. Social media allows them to raise awareness, galvanize support, and engage with a broader audience beyond their geographical confines. The paper hypothesizes that social media plays a multifaceted role in supporting indigenous movements, by not only providing a platform for activists to organize and advocate, but also enabling engagement with the general public and influencing the perspectives and actions of policymakers and other audiences. Through the lenses of rural or indigenous activists who leverage these digital platforms to drive change, audiences who consume and interact with digital content and feeds, and policymakers who are increasingly mindful of the power of social media narratives, this paper aims to understand the complex interplay of forces that shape the trajectory of digital indigenism (indigenous digital activism).

METHODS

The paper employs a mixed-methods approach to investigate the influence of social media on social movements among indigenous communities in Southern Africa. The methodology incorporates (a) netnography and in-depth interviews to explore the experiences and strategies of indigenous activists, (b) the counterpublics framework to understand the formation and dynamics of indigenous digital activism, and (c) the Technology-Media-Movements Complex (TMMC) as a theoretical anchor to analyze the interplay between technology, media, and social movements. The case study of the Community Leaders Network (CLN) of Southern Africa is used to contextualize the findings.

RESULTS

Findings reveal that indigenous activists recognize the power of social media in amplifying their voices but use these platforms out of necessity rather than preference. They find social media solutions often misaligned with their contextual needs, citing concerns over platform constraints, privacy issues, cultural insensitivity, superficial engagement metrics, and breaches of consent. Additionally, they reckon that the global emphasis on social media engagement can divert focus from essential field activities that directly benefit local communities, causing social media fatigue. It was also revealed that trying to convey practical information to an audience with preconceived notions is incredibly time-consuming and often feels like an endless loop for indigenous activists. Subsequently, they expressed a desire for platforms that consider users' mental well-being in their architectural design and incorporate cultural and linguistic practices, suggesting a preference for digital environments that are more aligned with values and modes of communication that contrast with western models.

DISCUSSION

The results underscore social media's complex role in indigenous movements, highlighting its empowering potential while also presenting significant challenges due to algorithms and platform dynamics. While the ability to share stories, disseminate information about rights abuses, and mobilize support has significantly transformed social movement dynamics in rural communities, social media's potential for advocacy and mobilization is tempered by challenges that can limit their effectiveness. The findings highlight a pressing need for social media innovations that resonate with indigenous cultural identities, ensuring that their narratives are disseminated in a manner that faithfully preserves their authenticity. The paper discusses the implications of these findings for policymakers, activists, audiences and technology developers, emphasizing the importance of creating digital spaces that are culturally sensitive and supportive of indigenous activism.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9f4/11521973/d66f04a5f5ec/fsoc-09-1433998-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9f4/11521973/05ff83efc798/fsoc-09-1433998-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9f4/11521973/d66f04a5f5ec/fsoc-09-1433998-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9f4/11521973/05ff83efc798/fsoc-09-1433998-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9f4/11521973/d66f04a5f5ec/fsoc-09-1433998-g002.jpg
摘要

引言

新冠疫情作为一场整体性的文化创伤事件,对全球社会结构和行为产生了重大影响。在其影响下,社会运动借助数字平台来维持并扩大其诉求,创造了新的团结和抵抗形式,推动了数字及混合集体行动的兴起。与此同时,社交媒体作为推动社会变革的变革性工具蓬勃发展,彻底改变了沟通、动员和宣传方式。WhatsApp和X等平台通过实现信息的快速传播和促进全球基层运动,重新定义了传统的激进主义。这种技术演变赋予了包括南部非洲原住民在内的边缘化社区强大的声音。这些社区面临着土地权纠纷、环境退化和社会经济边缘化等挑战。社交媒体使他们能够提高认识、争取支持,并与地理范围之外的更广泛受众互动。本文假设社交媒体在支持原住民运动中发挥着多方面作用,不仅为活动家提供组织和宣传的平台,还能促进与公众的互动,并影响政策制定者和其他受众的观点及行动。通过利用这些数字平台推动变革的农村或原住民活动家、消费和与数字内容及信息源互动的受众以及越来越重视社交媒体叙事力量的政策制定者的视角,本文旨在理解塑造数字原住民主义(原住民数字激进主义)轨迹的各种力量的复杂相互作用。

方法

本文采用混合方法来研究社交媒体对南部非洲原住民社区社会运动的影响。该方法包括:(a)网络民族志和深入访谈,以探索原住民活动家的经历和策略;(b)反公众框架,以理解原住民数字激进主义的形成和动态;(c)技术-媒体-运动复合体(TMMC)作为理论支柱,来分析技术、媒体和社会运动之间的相互作用。以南非洲社区领袖网络(CLN)的案例研究来对研究结果进行背景分析。

结果

研究结果表明,原住民活动家认识到社交媒体在放大他们声音方面的力量,但使用这些平台是出于必要而非偏好。他们发现社交媒体解决方案往往与他们的实际需求不符,理由包括对平台限制、隐私问题、文化不敏感、表面的参与指标以及违反同意等方面的担忧。此外,他们认为全球对社交媒体参与的强调可能会使注意力从直接造福当地社区的重要实地活动上转移,导致社交媒体疲劳。研究还表明,试图向有先入为主观念的受众传达实际信息对原住民活动家来说极其耗时,而且常常感觉像是一个无尽的循环。随后,他们表达了对在架构设计中考虑用户心理健康并融入文化和语言实践的平台的渴望,表明他们更喜欢与西方模式形成对比、更符合价值观和沟通方式的数字环境。

讨论

结果强调了社交媒体在原住民运动中的复杂作用,凸显了其赋权潜力,同时也由于算法和平台动态带来了重大挑战。虽然分享故事、传播有关侵权行为的信息以及争取支持的能力显著改变了农村社区的社会运动动态,但社交媒体在宣传和动员方面的潜力受到可能限制其有效性的挑战的制约。研究结果凸显了迫切需要与原住民文化身份产生共鸣的社交媒体创新,确保他们的叙事以忠实保留其真实性的方式传播。本文讨论了这些发现对政策制定者、活动家、受众和技术开发者的影响,强调了创建对文化敏感且支持原住民激进主义的数字空间的重要性。

相似文献

1
COVID-19, social media, algorithms and the rise of indigenous movements in Southern Africa: perspectives from activists, audiences and policymakers.新冠疫情、社交媒体、算法与南部非洲本土运动的兴起:活动家、受众及政策制定者的观点
Front Sociol. 2024 Oct 16;9:1433998. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1433998. eCollection 2024.
2
Counter-Discourse Activism on Social Media: The Case of Challenging "Poverty Porn" Television.社交媒体上的反话语行动主义:挑战“贫困色情”电视节目的案例
Comput Support Coop Work. 2017;26(3):345-385. doi: 10.1007/s10606-017-9275-z. Epub 2017 May 16.
3
Imagining Neurodivergent Futures from the Belly of the Identity Machine: Neurodiversity, Biosociality, and Strategic Essentialism.从身份机器的核心想象神经差异的未来:神经多样性、生物社会性与策略性本质主义
Autism Adulthood. 2023 Sep 1;5(3):225-235. doi: 10.1089/aut.2021.0075. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
4
Australia in 2030: what is our path to health for all?2030 年的澳大利亚:全民健康之路在何方?
Med J Aust. 2021 May;214 Suppl 8:S5-S40. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51020.
5
Experiences in Conducting Participatory Communication Research for HIV Prevention Globally: Translating Critical Dialog into Action through Action Media.全球艾滋病毒预防参与式传播研究经验:通过行动媒体将关键对话转化为行动。
Front Public Health. 2016 Jun 22;4:128. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00128. eCollection 2016.
6
Evidence and gap map report: Social and Behavior Change Communication (SBCC) interventions for strengthening HIV prevention and research among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).证据与差距地图报告:在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)加强青少年女孩和年轻女性(AGYW)中艾滋病毒预防及研究的社会和行为改变沟通(SBCC)干预措施
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 10;19(1):e1297. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1297. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
The Impact of Social Media Use on Mental Health and Family Functioning Within Web-Based Communities in Saudi Arabia: Ethnographic Correlational Study.社交媒体使用对沙特阿拉伯网络社区中心理健康和家庭功能的影响:人种志相关研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jan 16;8:e44923. doi: 10.2196/44923.
8
Climate change and Indigenous mental health in Australia: In the aftermath of the defeat of the Voice referendum.澳大利亚的气候变化与原住民心理健康:在“声音”公投失败之后
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2024 May;70(3):615-618. doi: 10.1177/00207640231221091. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
9
In Brief: The White/Wiphala Paper on Indigenous Peoples’ Food Systems简而言之:关于原住民食物系统的《白色/威法拉文件》
10
Latency and Crisis: Mutual Aid Activism in the Covid-19 Pandemic.潜伏期与危机:新冠疫情中的互助行动主义
Qual Sociol. 2022;45(3):413-431. doi: 10.1007/s11133-022-09513-7. Epub 2022 Aug 5.

本文引用的文献

1
The digital repression of social movements, protest, and activism: A synthetic review.社会运动、抗议和激进主义的数字压制:综合综述。
Sci Adv. 2022 Mar 11;8(10):eabl8198. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abl8198. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
2
Organizational sensemaking in tough times: The ecology of NGOs' COVID-19 issue discourse communities on social media.艰难时期的组织意义建构:非政府组织在社交媒体上关于新冠疫情问题话语社群的生态
Comput Human Behav. 2021 Sep;122:106838. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106838. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
3
Covid-19 as cultural trauma.新冠疫情作为文化创伤。
Am J Cult Sociol. 2020;8(3):428-450. doi: 10.1057/s41290-020-00112-z. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
4
Algorithms and Health Misinformation: A Case Study of Vaccine Books on Amazon.算法与健康谣言:以亚马逊上的疫苗书籍为例
J Health Commun. 2020 May 3;25(5):394-401. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1776423. Epub 2020 Jun 14.