Foyet Metolo, Child Brian
Department of Geography, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Front Sociol. 2024 Oct 16;9:1433998. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1433998. eCollection 2024.
The COVID-19 pandemic, as a holistic event of cultural trauma, significantly influenced social structures and behaviors globally. Under its impact, social movements leveraged digital platforms to sustain and amplify their causes, creating new forms of solidarity and resistance, and fostering a rise in digital and hybrid collective actions. Concurrently, social media thrived as a transformative tool for social change, revolutionizing communication, mobilization, and advocacy. Platforms like WhatsApp and X redefined traditional activism by enabling rapid information dissemination and facilitating global grassroots movements. This technological evolution has provided marginalized communities, including the indigenous peoples of Southern Africa, with a powerful voice. These communities face challenges such as land rights disputes, environmental degradation, and socioeconomic marginalization. Social media allows them to raise awareness, galvanize support, and engage with a broader audience beyond their geographical confines. The paper hypothesizes that social media plays a multifaceted role in supporting indigenous movements, by not only providing a platform for activists to organize and advocate, but also enabling engagement with the general public and influencing the perspectives and actions of policymakers and other audiences. Through the lenses of rural or indigenous activists who leverage these digital platforms to drive change, audiences who consume and interact with digital content and feeds, and policymakers who are increasingly mindful of the power of social media narratives, this paper aims to understand the complex interplay of forces that shape the trajectory of digital indigenism (indigenous digital activism).
The paper employs a mixed-methods approach to investigate the influence of social media on social movements among indigenous communities in Southern Africa. The methodology incorporates (a) netnography and in-depth interviews to explore the experiences and strategies of indigenous activists, (b) the counterpublics framework to understand the formation and dynamics of indigenous digital activism, and (c) the Technology-Media-Movements Complex (TMMC) as a theoretical anchor to analyze the interplay between technology, media, and social movements. The case study of the Community Leaders Network (CLN) of Southern Africa is used to contextualize the findings.
Findings reveal that indigenous activists recognize the power of social media in amplifying their voices but use these platforms out of necessity rather than preference. They find social media solutions often misaligned with their contextual needs, citing concerns over platform constraints, privacy issues, cultural insensitivity, superficial engagement metrics, and breaches of consent. Additionally, they reckon that the global emphasis on social media engagement can divert focus from essential field activities that directly benefit local communities, causing social media fatigue. It was also revealed that trying to convey practical information to an audience with preconceived notions is incredibly time-consuming and often feels like an endless loop for indigenous activists. Subsequently, they expressed a desire for platforms that consider users' mental well-being in their architectural design and incorporate cultural and linguistic practices, suggesting a preference for digital environments that are more aligned with values and modes of communication that contrast with western models.
The results underscore social media's complex role in indigenous movements, highlighting its empowering potential while also presenting significant challenges due to algorithms and platform dynamics. While the ability to share stories, disseminate information about rights abuses, and mobilize support has significantly transformed social movement dynamics in rural communities, social media's potential for advocacy and mobilization is tempered by challenges that can limit their effectiveness. The findings highlight a pressing need for social media innovations that resonate with indigenous cultural identities, ensuring that their narratives are disseminated in a manner that faithfully preserves their authenticity. The paper discusses the implications of these findings for policymakers, activists, audiences and technology developers, emphasizing the importance of creating digital spaces that are culturally sensitive and supportive of indigenous activism.
新冠疫情作为一场整体性的文化创伤事件,对全球社会结构和行为产生了重大影响。在其影响下,社会运动借助数字平台来维持并扩大其诉求,创造了新的团结和抵抗形式,推动了数字及混合集体行动的兴起。与此同时,社交媒体作为推动社会变革的变革性工具蓬勃发展,彻底改变了沟通、动员和宣传方式。WhatsApp和X等平台通过实现信息的快速传播和促进全球基层运动,重新定义了传统的激进主义。这种技术演变赋予了包括南部非洲原住民在内的边缘化社区强大的声音。这些社区面临着土地权纠纷、环境退化和社会经济边缘化等挑战。社交媒体使他们能够提高认识、争取支持,并与地理范围之外的更广泛受众互动。本文假设社交媒体在支持原住民运动中发挥着多方面作用,不仅为活动家提供组织和宣传的平台,还能促进与公众的互动,并影响政策制定者和其他受众的观点及行动。通过利用这些数字平台推动变革的农村或原住民活动家、消费和与数字内容及信息源互动的受众以及越来越重视社交媒体叙事力量的政策制定者的视角,本文旨在理解塑造数字原住民主义(原住民数字激进主义)轨迹的各种力量的复杂相互作用。
本文采用混合方法来研究社交媒体对南部非洲原住民社区社会运动的影响。该方法包括:(a)网络民族志和深入访谈,以探索原住民活动家的经历和策略;(b)反公众框架,以理解原住民数字激进主义的形成和动态;(c)技术-媒体-运动复合体(TMMC)作为理论支柱,来分析技术、媒体和社会运动之间的相互作用。以南非洲社区领袖网络(CLN)的案例研究来对研究结果进行背景分析。
研究结果表明,原住民活动家认识到社交媒体在放大他们声音方面的力量,但使用这些平台是出于必要而非偏好。他们发现社交媒体解决方案往往与他们的实际需求不符,理由包括对平台限制、隐私问题、文化不敏感、表面的参与指标以及违反同意等方面的担忧。此外,他们认为全球对社交媒体参与的强调可能会使注意力从直接造福当地社区的重要实地活动上转移,导致社交媒体疲劳。研究还表明,试图向有先入为主观念的受众传达实际信息对原住民活动家来说极其耗时,而且常常感觉像是一个无尽的循环。随后,他们表达了对在架构设计中考虑用户心理健康并融入文化和语言实践的平台的渴望,表明他们更喜欢与西方模式形成对比、更符合价值观和沟通方式的数字环境。
结果强调了社交媒体在原住民运动中的复杂作用,凸显了其赋权潜力,同时也由于算法和平台动态带来了重大挑战。虽然分享故事、传播有关侵权行为的信息以及争取支持的能力显著改变了农村社区的社会运动动态,但社交媒体在宣传和动员方面的潜力受到可能限制其有效性的挑战的制约。研究结果凸显了迫切需要与原住民文化身份产生共鸣的社交媒体创新,确保他们的叙事以忠实保留其真实性的方式传播。本文讨论了这些发现对政策制定者、活动家、受众和技术开发者的影响,强调了创建对文化敏感且支持原住民激进主义的数字空间的重要性。