Suppr超能文献

降低标本拒收率的品管圈实践

Quality Control Circle Practices to Reduce Specimen Rejection Rates.

作者信息

Li Bijun, Cai Xinjian, Zhan Lili, Zhang Xiaoyu, Lin Yiteng, Zeng Jiaomei

机构信息

Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, 518116, People's Republic of China.

Department of Nursing, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, 518116, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Oct 26;17:4925-4935. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S486276. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quality assurance in laboratory testing significantly impacts patient care. The pre-analytical phase is particularly error-prone, contributing to around 70% of laboratory errors. High specimen rejection rates can delay diagnosis and treatment, cause patient discomfort, and increase healthcare costs. Quality Control Circles (QCC) have been introduced to medical institutions to improve process efficiency and reduce errors. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of QCC practices in reducing specimen rejection rates in a hospital clinical laboratory.

METHODS

A QCC initiative was implemented in the clinical laboratory from July 2021 to August 2022. The QCC comprised members from the clinical laboratory, nursing department, and administration. The initiative followed the PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle and involved multiple quality control methods, including flowchart analysis, Pareto analysis, and Fishbone diagrams. The effectiveness of the initiative was evaluated using statistical analyses of specimen rejection rates before and after implementation.

RESULTS

The QCC initiative led to a significant reduction in specimen rejection rates. The monthly specimen rejection rate decreased from an average of 1.13% before the intervention to 0.27% after the intervention. The most significant factors contributing to specimen rejection were identified as lack of sample collection information and blood clotting. Targeted interventions, such as appointing specimen collection liaisons, establishing a quality control team, and providing training on blood collection procedures, were implemented. These measures resulted in a notable decrease in the proportion of rejected specimens due to the identified factors.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of QCC practices effectively reduced specimen rejection rates in the hospital laboratory. The study highlights the importance of systematic quality control methods and targeted interventions in improving laboratory processes. The success of the QCC initiative demonstrates its potential for broader application in other healthcare settings to enhance quality and efficiency.

摘要

背景

实验室检测中的质量保证对患者护理有着重大影响。分析前阶段尤其容易出错,约占实验室误差的70%。高标本拒收率会延迟诊断和治疗,给患者带来不适,并增加医疗成本。质量控制圈(QCC)已被引入医疗机构以提高流程效率并减少误差。本研究旨在评估QCC实践在降低医院临床实验室标本拒收率方面的有效性。

方法

2021年7月至2022年8月在临床实验室实施了一项QCC举措。QCC由临床实验室、护理部门和行政部门的成员组成。该举措遵循PDCA(计划-执行-检查-行动)循环,并涉及多种质量控制方法,包括流程图分析、帕累托分析和鱼骨图。通过对实施前后标本拒收率的统计分析来评估该举措的有效性。

结果

QCC举措导致标本拒收率显著降低。每月标本拒收率从干预前的平均1.13%降至干预后的0.27%。导致标本拒收的最主要因素被确定为样本采集信息缺失和血液凝固。实施了针对性干预措施,如指定标本采集联络人、组建质量控制团队以及提供采血程序培训。这些措施使得因已确定因素导致的拒收标本比例显著下降。

结论

QCC实践的实施有效降低了医院实验室的标本拒收率。该研究凸显了系统质量控制方法和针对性干预措施在改善实验室流程方面的重要性。QCC举措的成功证明了其在其他医疗环境中更广泛应用以提高质量和效率的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39dd/11523946/2a092319d92e/JMDH-17-4925-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验