Al-Maqtari Qais Ali, Othman Norzila, Mohammed Jalaleldeen Khaleel, Mahdi Amer Ali, Al-Ansi Waleed, Noman Abeer Essam, Al-Gheethi Adel Ali Saeed, Asharuddin Syazwani Mohd
Micro-Pollutant Research Centre (MPRC), Faculty of Civil Engineering and Built Environment Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Batu Pahat Johor Malaysia.
Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Food, and Environment Sana'a University Sana'a Yemen.
Food Sci Nutr. 2024 Aug 29;12(10):8255-8279. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.4431. eCollection 2024 Oct.
and are unique plants that show significant bioactive properties and are used for the treatment of a variety of diseases. This study assessed the nutritional values, functional properties, chemical composition, and bioactive attributes of these plants as functional nutritional supplements. Compared to , had higher fat (4.76%), fiber (16.07%), total carbohydrates (55.87%), and energy (302.15 kcal/100 g DW), along with superior functional properties, including higher water and oil absorption capacities (638.81% and 425.85%, respectively) and foaming capacity and stability (25.67% and 58.48%). The investigation of volatile compounds found that had higher amounts of hotrienol (4.53%), yomogi alcohol (3.92%), caryophyllene (3.67%), and carvotanacetone (3.64%), which possess anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and antioxidant properties. contributed over 30% of the recommended dietary intake (RDI) of amino acids. It displayed superior levels of sodium (31.46 mg/100 g DW) and calcium (238.07 mg/100 g DW). It also exhibited higher levels of organic acids, particularly malic acid, butyric acid, and succinic acid, compared to . Fatty acid analysis revealed palmitic and linoleic acids as primary components in both plants, with having a higher palmitic acid content. also had higher vitamin C and thiamine levels. Although showed the highest total phenolic content (TPC), antioxidant activity, and capacity, demonstrated acceptable efficiency in TPC and antioxidant content. These findings highlight the potential of both species, particularly , as valuable sources of nutrients and bioactive compounds for various applications.
[植物名称1]和[植物名称2]是具有显著生物活性特性的独特植物,可用于治疗多种疾病。本研究评估了这些植物作为功能性营养补充剂的营养价值、功能特性、化学成分和生物活性属性。与[植物名称2]相比,[植物名称1]的脂肪含量更高(4.76%)、纤维含量更高(16.07%)、总碳水化合物含量更高(55.87%)以及能量更高(302.15千卡/100克干重),同时具有更优异的功能特性,包括更高的吸水和吸油能力(分别为638.81%和425.85%)以及发泡能力和稳定性(25.67%和58.48%)。挥发性化合物的研究发现,[植物名称1]含有更多的热烯醇(4.53%)、艾醇(3.92%)、石竹烯(3.67%)和香芹酮(3.64%),这些物质具有抗炎、抗菌和抗氧化特性。[植物名称1]提供了超过30%的推荐膳食摄入量(RDI)的氨基酸。它的钠含量(31.46毫克/100克干重)和钙含量(238.07毫克/100克干重)也较高。与[植物名称2]相比,它还含有更高水平的有机酸,尤其是苹果酸、丁酸和琥珀酸。脂肪酸分析表明,两种植物中的主要成分都是棕榈酸和亚油酸,[植物名称1]的棕榈酸含量更高。[植物名称1]的维生素C和硫胺素水平也更高。尽管[植物名称2]的总酚含量(TPC)、抗氧化活性和能力最高,但[植物名称1]在TPC和抗氧化含量方面也表现出可接受的效率。这些发现突出了这两种[植物名称]物种,特别是[植物名称1],作为各种应用中营养和生物活性化合物宝贵来源的潜力。