Department of Psychology, Utah State University.
Department of Psychology, University of North Texas.
Psychol Bull. 2024 Nov;150(11):1261-1286. doi: 10.1037/bul0000447.
We conducted a multilevel meta-analysis of 390 effect sizes from 167 studies with 157,923 participants examining the relationship between connectedness with lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ+) communities and health-related outcomes, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We conducted our initial search in January 2023 in APA PsycInfo, ERIC, Medline, and Open Dissertations, selecting studies that (a) measured LGBTQ+ community connectedness, (b) measured health, and (c) provided an estimate of the relationship between LGBTQ+ community connectedness and health. We found that connectedness with LGBTQ+ communities promotes mental health (r = .11), well-being (r = .17), and physical health (r = .09). Conversely, we found that connectedness with LGBTQ+ communities promotes substance use among younger participants, likely through behavioral engagement with LGBTQ+ others. We found that connectedness with LGBTQ+ communities was related to less mental health and more suicidality for younger people, likely because younger LGBTQ+ people seek out connectedness in response to this psychological distress. We also found that connectedness was not as health-promoting for LGBTQ+ individuals with multiple marginalized identities and that psychological feelings of belongingness with LGBTQ+ communities are generally more health-promoting than behavioral community engagement. Results from a narrative review and moderation meta-analyses suggested that, contrary to predictions made by minority stress theory, connectedness with LGBTQ+ communities does not buffer the relationship between minority stressors and health. Rather, meta-analytic mediation analyses suggested that proximal minority stressors negatively impact health-related outcomes by reducing connectedness with LGBTQ+ communities and that distal minority stressors are often less impactful on health-related outcomes because they promote connectedness with LGBTQ+ communities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
我们对 167 项研究的 390 个效应量进行了多层次元分析,这些研究共有 157923 名参与者,旨在研究与女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿/疑问者(LGBTQ+)社区的联系与健康相关结果之间的关系,遵循系统评价和元分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。我们于 2023 年 1 月在 APA PsycInfo、ERIC、Medline 和 Open Dissertations 中进行了初步搜索,选择了符合以下标准的研究:(a)测量 LGBTQ+社区的联系,(b)测量健康,以及(c)提供 LGBTQ+社区联系与健康之间关系的估计。我们发现,与 LGBTQ+社区的联系有助于促进心理健康(r =.11)、幸福感(r =.17)和身体健康(r =.09)。相反,我们发现与 LGBTQ+社区的联系促进了年轻参与者的物质使用,这可能是通过与 LGBTQ+他人的行为参与。我们发现,与 LGBTQ+社区的联系与年轻人的心理健康较差和自杀意念较多有关,这可能是因为年轻的 LGBTQ+人寻求联系以应对这种心理困扰。我们还发现,对于具有多种边缘化身份的 LGBTQ+个体,联系并不像促进健康那样有效,而且与 LGBTQ+社区的心理归属感通常比行为上的社区参与更能促进健康。叙述性评论和调节元分析的结果表明,与少数群体压力理论的预测相反,与 LGBTQ+社区的联系并不能缓冲少数群体压力源与健康之间的关系。相反,元分析中介分析表明,近端少数群体压力源通过降低与 LGBTQ+社区的联系,对健康相关结果产生负面影响,而远端少数群体压力源对健康相关结果的影响往往较小,因为它们促进了与 LGBTQ+社区的联系。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。