Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas at Austin.
Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania.
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2024 Nov;133(8):716-732. doi: 10.1037/abn0000945.
Theoretical and methodological research on threat conditioning provides important neuroscience-informed approaches to studying fear and anxiety. The threat conditioning framework is at the vanguard of physiological and neurobiological research into core mechanistic symptoms of anxiety-related psychopathology, providing detailed models of neural circuitry underlying variability in clinically relevant behaviors (e.g., decreased extinction, heightened generalization) and heterogeneity in clinical anxiety presentations. Despite the strengths of this approach in explaining symptom and syndromal heterogeneity, the vast majority of psychopathology-oriented threat conditioning work has been conducted using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) diagnostic categories, which fail to capture the symptom-level resolution that is afforded by threat conditioning indices. Furthermore, relations between fine-grained neurobehavioral measures of threat conditioning and anxiety traits and symptoms are substantially attenuated by within-category heterogeneity, arbitrary boundaries, and inherent comorbidity in the DSM approach. Conversely, the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) is a promising approach for modeling anxiety symptoms relevant to threat conditioning work and for relating threat conditioning to broader anxiety-related constructs. To date, HiTOP has had a minimal impact on the threat conditioning field. Here, we propose that combining the HiTOP and neurobehavioral threat conditioning approaches is an important next step in studying anxiety-related pathology. We provide a brief review of prominent DSM critiques and how they affect threat conditioning studies and review relevant research and suggest solutions and recommendations that flow from the HiTOP perspective. Our hope is that this effort serves as both an inflection point and practical primer for HiTOP-aligned threat conditioning research that benefits both fields. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
威胁条件作用的理论和方法研究为研究恐惧和焦虑提供了重要的神经科学方法。威胁条件作用框架处于生理和神经生物学研究的前沿,研究了焦虑相关精神病理学的核心机制症状,为临床相关行为(例如,消退减少、泛化增强)的神经回路提供了详细的模型,以及临床焦虑表现的异质性。尽管这种方法在解释症状和综合征异质性方面具有优势,但绝大多数以精神病理学为导向的威胁条件作用研究都是使用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM)诊断类别进行的,这些研究无法捕捉到威胁条件作用指数所提供的症状水平分辨率。此外,威胁条件作用的神经行为指标与焦虑特质和症状之间的关系,由于 DSM 方法中的类别内异质性、任意边界和固有共病性而大大减弱。相反,精神病理学的分层分类法(HiTOP)是一种很有前途的方法,可以对与威胁条件作用相关的焦虑症状进行建模,以及将威胁条件作用与更广泛的焦虑相关结构联系起来。迄今为止,HiTOP 对威胁条件作用领域的影响微乎其微。在这里,我们提出将 HiTOP 和神经行为威胁条件作用方法结合起来是研究与威胁条件作用相关的病理学的重要下一步。我们简要回顾了 DSM 的突出批评以及它们如何影响威胁条件作用研究,并回顾了相关研究,并从 HiTOP 的角度提出了解决方案和建议。我们希望这项工作既是 HiTOP 一致的威胁条件作用研究的转折点,也是实用入门,这将使两个领域都受益。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。