De Marco Gabriele, Marchesoni Antonio, Manara Maria, Gisondi Paolo, Idolazzi Luca, Ramonda Roberta, Piaserico Stefano, Cauli Alberto, Cimmino Marco Amedeo, Tomatis Veronica, Salvarani Carlo, Scrivo Rossana, Zanetti Anna, Carrara Greta, Scirè Carlo Alberto, Cattaneo Angelo
NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, UK.
Rheumatology of Humanitas San Pio X, Milano, Italy.
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2025 Jan;43(1):28-33. doi: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/ug6vti. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a dermatologist-filled-in 7-item questionnaire (called HERACLES) as a screening tool for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients with psoriasis.
This study was performed in Italy in seven dermatology centres cooperating with rheumatology centres. Adults with psoriasis were consecutively recruited up to a calculated number of 750. They were invited to fill in the following questionnaires used for PsA screening: ToPAS, PASE, PEST, and EARP. The dermatologists, in addition to standard demographic and clinical data, scored each participant using a new 7-item questionnaire. All participants were later evaluated by the rheumatologists for a diagnosis of PsA. The performance of the various questionnaires was compared using receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) area-under-the-curve (AUC) analysis.
Of the 759 enrolled psoriatic patients, 524 (280 males and 244 females) were suitable for data analysis. PsA was diagnosed in 73 (13.9%) participants. PsA and non-PsA patient characteristics were comparable, except for arthritis-related features which were often more prevalent in the PsA group. The ROC AUC of the HERACLES instrument was 0.775 (CI: 0.722-0.828), similar to that of the other questionnaires (ToPAS 0.757; PASE 0.730; PEST 0.741; and EARP 0.739). For the HERACLES instrument, a score value of 2 yielded a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 47%.
In this study, a dermatologist-filled-in questionnaire proved to be not inferior to patient-administered PsA screening tools and to be feasible. It might be an alternative (or additional) tool to screen psoriatic patients for rheumatology referral.
本研究旨在评估皮肤科医生填写的7项问卷(称为HERACLES)作为银屑病患者银屑病关节炎(PsA)筛查工具的性能。
本研究在意大利的7个与风湿病中心合作的皮肤科中心进行。连续招募患有银屑病的成年人,直至达到计算得出的750例。邀请他们填写以下用于PsA筛查的问卷:ToPAS、PASE、PEST和EARP。皮肤科医生除了记录标准的人口统计学和临床数据外,还使用新的7项问卷对每位参与者进行评分。所有参与者随后由风湿病医生进行评估以诊断PsA。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)分析比较各种问卷的性能。
在759名登记的银屑病患者中,524例(280名男性和244名女性)适合进行数据分析。73例(13.9%)参与者被诊断为PsA。PsA患者和非PsA患者的特征具有可比性,但关节炎相关特征在PsA组中通常更为普遍。HERACLES工具的ROC AUC为0.775(CI:0.722 - 0.828),与其他问卷(ToPAS 0.757;PASE 0.730;PEST 0.741;EARP 0.739)相似。对于HERACLES工具,得分值为2时,敏感性为92%,特异性为47%。
在本研究中,皮肤科医生填写的问卷被证明不逊色于患者自行填写的PsA筛查工具,并且是可行的。它可能是一种用于筛查银屑病患者以便转诊至风湿病科的替代(或附加)工具。