• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中文社交媒体中气候变化错误信息的语义特征描述。

Characterizing the semantic features of climate change misinformation on Chinese social media.

机构信息

University of Science and Technology of China, China.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2023 Oct;32(7):845-859. doi: 10.1177/09636625231166542. Epub 2023 May 10.

DOI:10.1177/09636625231166542
PMID:37162274
Abstract

Climate change misinformation leads to significant adverse impacts and has become a global concern. Identifying misinformation and investigating its characteristics are of great importance to counteract misinformation. Therefore, this study aims to characterize the semantic features (frames and authority references) of climate change misinformation in the context of Chinese social media. Posts concerning climate change were collected from Weibo between January 2010 and December 2020. First, veracity, frames, and authority references were manually labeled. Then, we applied logistic regression to examine the relationship between information veracity and semantic features. The results revealed that posts concerning environmental and health impact and science and technology were more likely to be misinformation. Moreover, posts referencing non-specific authority sources are more likely to be misinformed than posts making no references to any authority references. This study provides a theoretical understanding of the semantic characteristics of climate change misinformation and practical suggestions for combating them.

摘要

气候变化错误信息导致了重大的负面影响,已成为全球关注的焦点。识别错误信息并研究其特征对于对抗错误信息非常重要。因此,本研究旨在描述中国社交媒体背景下气候变化错误信息的语义特征(框架和权威参考)。我们从 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间从微博上收集了有关气候变化的帖子。首先,我们手动标记了真实性、框架和权威参考。然后,我们应用逻辑回归来检验信息真实性和语义特征之间的关系。结果表明,有关环境和健康影响以及科学技术的帖子更有可能是错误信息。此外,引用非特定权威来源的帖子比没有引用任何权威参考的帖子更有可能被误导。本研究为气候变化错误信息的语义特征提供了理论理解,并为对抗错误信息提供了实用建议。

相似文献

1
Characterizing the semantic features of climate change misinformation on Chinese social media.中文社交媒体中气候变化错误信息的语义特征描述。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Oct;32(7):845-859. doi: 10.1177/09636625231166542. Epub 2023 May 10.
2
Changing the incentive structure of social media platforms to halt the spread of misinformation.改变社交媒体平台的激励结构以阻止错误信息的传播。
Elife. 2023 Jun 6;12:e85767. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85767.
3
Understanding How and by Whom COVID-19 Misinformation is Spread on Social Media: Coding and Network Analyses.理解社交媒体上 COVID-19 错误信息是如何以及由谁传播的:编码和网络分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 20;24(6):e37623. doi: 10.2196/37623.
4
Investigation of Public Acceptance of Misinformation Correction in Social Media Based on Sentiment Attributions: Infodemiology Study Using Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis.基于情感归因的社交媒体中错误信息更正公众接受度的调查:基于方面情感分析的信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 16;26:e50353. doi: 10.2196/50353.
5
From pandemic to Plandemic: Examining the amplification and attenuation of COVID-19 misinformation on social media.从大流行到阴谋论:社交媒体上 COVID-19 错误信息的放大和衰减。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Jul;328:115979. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115979. Epub 2023 May 22.
6
Social Media's Initial Reaction to Information and Misinformation on Ebola, August 2014: Facts and Rumors.社交媒体对2014年8月埃博拉信息与错误信息的初步反应:事实与谣言
Public Health Rep. 2016 May-Jun;131(3):461-73. doi: 10.1177/003335491613100312.
7
Characterizing and Identifying the Prevalence of Web-Based Misinformation Relating to Medication for Opioid Use Disorder: Machine Learning Approach.描述和识别与阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗相关的网络错误信息的流行情况:机器学习方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 22;23(12):e30753. doi: 10.2196/30753.
8
Using Machine Learning-Based Approaches for the Detection and Classification of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Misinformation: Infodemiology Study of Reddit Discussions.基于机器学习的方法在人乳头瘤病毒疫苗错误信息检测和分类中的应用:对 Reddit 讨论的信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 5;23(8):e26478. doi: 10.2196/26478.
9
Nature and Diffusion of Gynecologic Cancer-Related Misinformation on Social Media: Analysis of Tweets.社交媒体上妇科癌症相关错误信息的性质与传播:推文分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 16;20(10):e11515. doi: 10.2196/11515.
10
(Mis)Information on Digital Platforms: Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Content From Twitter and Sina Weibo in the COVID-19 Pandemic.数字平台上的(错误)信息:新冠疫情期间推特和新浪微博内容的定量与定性分析
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Feb 24;2(1):e31793. doi: 10.2196/31793. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Misinformation About Climate Change and Related Environmental Events on Social Media: Protocol for a Scoping Review.社交媒体上关于气候变化和相关环境事件的错误信息:范围综述的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Oct 31;13:e59345. doi: 10.2196/59345.
2
Disinformation as an obstructionist strategy in climate change mitigation: a review of the scientific literature for a systemic understanding of the phenomenon.虚假信息作为减缓气候变化的阻碍策略:对科学文献的综述以系统理解该现象
Open Res Eur. 2024 Sep 24;4:169. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.18180.2. eCollection 2024.