School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TU, United Kingdom; email:
School of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia.
Annu Rev Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;42:1-21. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102409. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
Climate change presents a challenge at multiple levels: It challenges our cognitive abilities because the effect of the accumulation of emissions is difficult to understand. Climate change also challenges many people's worldview because any climate mitigation regime will have economic and political implications that are incompatible with libertarian ideals of unregulated free markets. These political implications have created an environment of rhetorical adversity in which disinformation abounds, thus compounding the challenges for climate communicators. The existing literature on how to communicate climate change and dispel misinformation converges on several conclusions: First, providing information about climate change, in particular explanations of why it occurs, can enhance people's acceptance of science. Second, highlighting the scientific consensus can be an effective means to counter misinformation and raise public acceptance. Third, culturally aligned messages and messengers are more likely to be successful. Finally, climate misinformation is best defanged, through a process known as inoculation, before it is encountered, although debunking techniques can also be successful.
它挑战了我们的认知能力,因为排放积累的影响难以理解。气候变化还挑战了许多人的世界观,因为任何气候缓解机制都将产生经济和政治影响,这些影响与无监管自由市场的自由意志主义理想不符。这些政治影响造成了一种修辞对抗的环境,其中充斥着虚假信息,从而使气候传播者面临更大的挑战。关于如何传播气候变化信息和消除错误信息的现有文献得出了几个结论:第一,提供有关气候变化的信息,特别是解释其发生的原因,可以增强人们对科学的接受程度。第二,强调科学共识是对抗错误信息和提高公众接受度的有效手段。第三,与文化相一致的信息和传播者更有可能取得成功。最后,通过称为接种的过程,在遇到之前最好先削弱气候错误信息,尽管揭穿技术也可能取得成功。