Suppr超能文献

使用基于光子计数探测器 CT 的多能量定位射线照片对面积骨密度进行定量评估。

Quantitative assessment of areal bone mineral density using multi-energy localizer radiographs from photon-counting detector CT.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.

Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Malvern, PA, United States of America.

出版信息

Phys Med Biol. 2024 Nov 12;69(22). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad8da1.

Abstract

To assess the accuracy and stability of areal bone-mineral-density (aBMD) measurements from multi-energy CT localizer radiographs acquired using photon-counting detector (PCD) CT.A European Spine Phantom (ESP) with hydroxyapatite (HA 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 g cm) was scanned using clinical PCD-CT and a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to compare aBMD values. To assess aBMD stability and reproducibility, PCD-localizers were acquired twice a day for one week, and once per week for five weeks. Multiple ESP anteroposterior thicknesses (18, 26, 34, and 40 cm) were achieved using a synthetic gel layer and scanned across eight tube current values for both 120 kV (15-120 mA) and 140 kV (10-80 mA). One-way analysis of variance was performed for statistical significance (< 0.05 considered significant). Quantitative HA and water maps were reconstructed using a prototype material-decomposition software, and aBMD was calculated after background correction.performance of PCD-based aBMD was illustrated using a patient scan acquired at 140 kV and 40 mA, and lumbar aBMD values were compared with DXA.The ESP aBMD values from PCD-localizers demonstrated excellent day-to-day stability with a coefficient-of-variation ranging from 0.42% to 0.53%, with mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) of less than 5% for all three vertebral bodies. The coefficient-of-variation for weekly scans ranged from 0.17% to 0.60%, again with MAPE below 5% for all three vertebral bodies. Across phantom sizes and tube currents, the MAPE values varied ranging from 1.84% to 13.78% for 120 kV, and 1.38%-9.11% for 140 kV. No significant difference was found between different tube currents. For the standard phantom size, DXA showed 11.21% MAPE whereas PCD-CT showed 3.04% MAPE. For the patient scan, deviation between PCD-based aBMD values and those obtained from DXA ranged from 0.07% to 9.82% for different lumbar vertebra.This study highlights the accuracy and stability of PCD-CT localizers for measuring aBMD. We demonstrated aBMD accuracy across different sizes and showed that higher radiation doses did not inherently increase aBMD accuracy.

摘要

评估基于多能量 CT 定位器射线照片的体骨矿物质密度(aBMD)测量的准确性和稳定性,这些射线照片是使用光子计数探测器(PCD)CT 采集的。使用临床 PCD-CT 和双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)对具有羟磷灰石(HA 0.5、1.0 和 1.5 g cm)的欧洲脊柱模型(ESP)进行扫描,以比较 aBMD 值。为了评估 aBMD 的稳定性和可重复性,每天两次在一周内采集 PCD 定位器,每周一次采集五周。使用合成凝胶层实现多个 ESP 前后厚度(18、26、34 和 40 cm),并针对 120 kV(15-120 mA)和 140 kV(10-80 mA)对八个管电流值进行扫描。使用原型材料分解软件对单向方差分析进行统计显着性检验(<0.05 视为显着)。使用在 140 kV 和 40 mA 采集的患者扫描来演示基于 PCD 的 aBMD 的性能,并将腰椎 aBMD 值与 DXA 进行比较。PCD-定位器的 ESP aBMD 值显示出出色的日常稳定性,变异系数范围为 0.42%至 0.53%,所有三个椎体的平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)均小于 5%。每周扫描的变异系数范围为 0.17%至 0.60%,所有三个椎体的 MAPE 再次低于 5%。在整个体模尺寸和管电流范围内,120 kV 的 MAPE 值变化范围为 1.84%至 13.78%,140 kV 的 MAPE 值变化范围为 1.38%至 9.11%。不同管电流之间没有发现显着差异。对于标准体模尺寸,DXA 显示 11.21%MAPE,而 PCD-CT 显示 3.04%MAPE。对于患者扫描,PCD 基于 aBMD 值与 DXA 获得的值之间的偏差范围为 0.07%至 9.82%,用于不同的腰椎。本研究强调了 PCD-CT 定位器测量 aBMD 的准确性和稳定性。我们展示了跨不同尺寸的 aBMD 准确性,并表明更高的辐射剂量不会固有地增加 aBMD 准确性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验