Peláez-Sanchez Cristina A, Pajarón-Guerrero Marcos, Rodriguez-Caballero Angelina, Dueñas Juan Carlos, Piriz Ana B, Martín-Láez Rubén, Sampedro Isabel, Velásquez Carlos
Department of Neurological Surgery, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain; Fundación Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla, Cantabria, Spain.
Fundación Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla, Cantabria, Spain; Hospital-at-Home Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
World Neurosurg. 2025 Jan;193:1002-1007. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.093. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
This study evaluates the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of an oncological outpatient neurosurgery protocol using enhanced recovery after surgery principles in a European healthcare setting. Additionally, it assesses the impact of incorporating hospital at home (HaH) for perioperative follow-up on program efficiency and costs.
We analyzed a case cohort of patients who underwent oncological outpatient neurosurgery with HaH-based postoperative follow-up for tumor removal or biopsy at a tertiary care center since 2019. A control cohort treated under standard inpatient care was also examined. Costs associated with surgery and postoperative care were meticulously calculated for both groups.
The case (n = 17) and control (n = 38) cohorts had comparable demographics and clinical profiles. Surgical costs, including operating room, anesthesia, and surgeon fees, were similar across groups. However, postoperative monitoring was significantly shorter for the outpatient cohort, leading to reduced observation costs (P < 0.001). While the duration of follow-up care was similar, outpatient follow-up via HaH was more cost-effective, reducing overall surgery costs by approximately €2958 per patient (P < 0.001) compared to inpatient care. No significant differences were observed in costs related to treatment, radiology, or lab tests between groups.
Outpatient neurosurgery with HaH follow-up offers substantial cost savings without compromising care quality in a public health setting. Inpatient care's higher costs are largely due to bed utilization, while the integration of HaH does not add significant costs, making it a viable alternative for postoperative management.
本研究评估了在欧洲医疗环境中,采用术后加速康复原则的肿瘤门诊神经外科手术方案的效率和成本效益。此外,还评估了引入居家医院(HaH)进行围手术期随访对项目效率和成本的影响。
我们分析了自2019年以来在一家三级医疗中心接受基于HaH术后随访的肿瘤门诊神经外科手术以切除肿瘤或进行活检的患者病例队列。还检查了在标准住院护理下治疗的对照队列。对两组患者与手术和术后护理相关的成本进行了精确计算。
病例组(n = 17)和对照组(n = 38)在人口统计学和临床特征方面具有可比性。包括手术室、麻醉和外科医生费用在内的手术成本在各组之间相似。然而,门诊队列的术后监测时间明显更短,导致观察成本降低(P < 0.001)。虽然随访护理的持续时间相似,但通过HaH进行的门诊随访更具成本效益,与住院护理相比,每位患者的总体手术成本降低了约2958欧元(P < 0.001)。两组在与治疗、放射学或实验室检查相关的成本方面未观察到显著差异。
在公共卫生环境中,采用HaH随访的门诊神经外科手术在不影响护理质量的情况下可大幅节省成本。住院护理成本较高主要是由于床位使用,而引入HaH并不会增加显著成本,使其成为术后管理的可行替代方案。