• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腐殖酸添加到受微塑料污染的土壤中会促进黑绿豆(Vigna mungo L. Hepper)的生长,并改变根际微生物群落。

The addition of humic acid into soil contaminated with microplastics enhanced the growth of black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) and modified the rhizosphere microbial community.

机构信息

Centre for Environmental Studies, Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering Guindy, Anna University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 025, India.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Nov;31(54):63343-63359. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-35441-w. Epub 2024 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-024-35441-w
PMID:39482414
Abstract

Microplastics have polluted agricultural soils, posing a substantial risk to crop productivity. Moreover, the presence of microplastic pollution has caused a disturbance in the composition of the microbial community in the soil surrounding plant roots, therefore impacting the growth of beneficial bacteria. A study was conducted to examine if humic acid (HA) can counteract the harmful effects of microplastics (MPs) on the growth of black gram crops and the composition of the rhizosphere soil microbial community, to reduce the negative impacts of microplastics on these microorganisms and crops. The research was carried out using mud pots and the plastic utilized for the experiment consisted of 60% high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and 40% polypropylene (PP). The soil was enriched with lignite-based potassium humate, which had a pH range of 8.0-9.5 and with 65% humic acid. The experiment consisted of six treatments: T1, which served as the control without HA and MP; T2, which involved the use of HA at a concentration of 0.15% w/w; T3, which involved the use of MP at a concentration of 0.2% w/w; T4, which involved the use of MP at a concentration of 0.4% w/w; T5, which involved the combination of HA at a concentration of 0.15% w/w and MP at a concentration of 0.2% w/w; and T6, which involved the combination of HA at a concentration of 0.15% w/w and MP at a concentration of 0.4% w/w. The plant growth characteristics, including germination percentage, nodule number, and chlorophyll content, were measured. In addition, the DNA obtained from the rhizosphere soil was analyzed using metagenomics techniques to investigate the organization of the microbial population. Seedlings in soil polluted with MP exhibited delayed germination compared to seedlings in uncontaminated soil. Following 60 days of growth, the soil samples treated with T5 (0.2% MP and 0.15% HA w/w) had the highest population of bacteria and rhizobium, with counts 5.58 ± 0.02 and 4.90 ± 0.02 CFU g soil. The plants cultivated in T5 had the most elevated chlorophyll-a concentration (1.340 ± 0.06 mg g), and chlorophyll-b concentration (0.62 ± 0.02 mg g) while those cultivated in T3 displayed the lowest concentration of chlorophyll-a (0.59 ± 0.02 mg g) and chlorophyll-b (0.21 ± 0.04 mg g). Within the phylum, Proteobacteria had the highest prevalence in all treatments. However, when the soil was polluted with MPs, its relative abundance was reduced by 8.4% compared to the control treatment (T1). Conversely, treatment T5 had a 3.76% rise in relative abundance when compared to treatment T3. The predominant taxa found in soil polluted with MP were Sphingomonas and Bacillus, accounting for 19.3% of the total. Sphingomonas was the predominant genus (21.2%) in soil polluted with MP and supplemented with humic acid. Humic acid can be used as a soil amendment to mitigate the negative effects of MPs and enhance their positive advantages. Research has demonstrated that incorporating humic acid into soil is a viable method for maintaining the long-term integrity of soil's physical, chemical, and biological characteristics.

摘要

微塑料已经污染了农业土壤,对作物生产力构成了重大威胁。此外,微塑料污染已经导致了植物根际土壤微生物群落的组成发生了干扰,从而影响了有益细菌的生长。一项研究旨在检验腐殖酸(HA)是否可以抵消微塑料(MPs)对黑绿豆作物生长和根际土壤微生物群落组成的有害影响,从而减少微塑料对这些微生物和作物的负面影响。该研究使用 Mud Pots 进行,实验中使用的塑料由 60%高密度聚乙烯(HDPE)和 40%聚丙烯(PP)组成。土壤中添加了基于褐煤的腐殖酸钾,其 pH 值范围为 8.0-9.5,腐殖酸含量为 65%。实验包括六种处理:T1 作为对照,不添加 HA 和 MP;T2 添加浓度为 0.15% w/w 的 HA;T3 添加浓度为 0.2% w/w 的 MP;T4 添加浓度为 0.4% w/w 的 MP;T5 添加浓度为 0.15% w/w 的 HA 和 0.2% w/w 的 MP;T6 添加浓度为 0.15% w/w 的 HA 和 0.4% w/w 的 MP。测量了植物生长特性,包括发芽率、根瘤数和叶绿素含量。此外,使用宏基因组学技术从根际土壤中提取的 DNA 进行分析,以研究微生物种群的组织。与未受污染土壤中的幼苗相比,受 MP 污染的土壤中的幼苗发芽时间延迟。经过 60 天的生长,用 T5(0.2% MP 和 0.15% HA w/w)处理的土壤样本中细菌和根瘤菌的数量最高,分别为 5.58 ± 0.02 和 4.90 ± 0.02 CFU g 土壤。在 T5 中培养的植物具有最高的叶绿素-a 浓度(1.340 ± 0.06 mg g)和叶绿素-b 浓度(0.62 ± 0.02 mg g),而在 T3 中培养的植物具有最低的叶绿素-a 浓度(0.59 ± 0.02 mg g)和叶绿素-b 浓度(0.21 ± 0.04 mg g)。在门水平上,变形菌在所有处理中均有最高的丰度。然而,当土壤受到 MPs 污染时,与对照处理(T1)相比,其相对丰度降低了 8.4%。相比之下,与 T3 相比,T5 处理的相对丰度增加了 3.76%。在受 MP 污染的土壤中,主要的分类群是鞘氨醇单胞菌和芽孢杆菌,占总数的 19.3%。在受 MP 污染并添加腐殖酸的土壤中,鞘氨醇单胞菌是主要的属(21.2%)。腐殖酸可用作土壤改良剂,以减轻 MPs 的负面影响并发挥其积极优势。研究表明,将腐殖酸融入土壤是维持土壤物理、化学和生物特性长期完整性的一种可行方法。

相似文献

1
The addition of humic acid into soil contaminated with microplastics enhanced the growth of black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) and modified the rhizosphere microbial community.腐殖酸添加到受微塑料污染的土壤中会促进黑绿豆(Vigna mungo L. Hepper)的生长,并改变根际微生物群落。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Nov;31(54):63343-63359. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-35441-w. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
2
Effect of polyethylene microplastics on antibiotic resistance genes: A comparison based on different soil types and plant types.聚乙烯微塑料对抗生素抗性基因的影响:基于不同土壤类型和植物类型的比较。
J Hazard Mater. 2024 Jul 5;472:134581. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134581. Epub 2024 May 11.
3
Microplastics affect soil-plant system: Implications for rhizosphere biology and fitness of sage (Salvia officinalis L.).微塑料影响土壤-植物系统:对鼠尾草(Salvia officinalis L.)根际生物学和健康状况的影响
Environ Pollut. 2024 Apr 1;346:123656. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123656. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
4
Effects of combined microplastic and cadmium pollution on sorghum growth, Cd accumulation, and rhizosphere microbial functions.复合微塑料和镉污染对高粱生长、Cd 积累和根际微生物功能的影响。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2024 Jun 1;277:116380. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116380. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
5
[Effects of Combined Stress of High Density Polyethylene Microplastics and Chlorimuron-ethyl on Soybean Growth and Rhizosphere Bacterial Community].[高密度聚乙烯微塑料与氯嘧磺隆复合胁迫对大豆生长及根际细菌群落的影响]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2024 Feb 8;45(2):1161-1172. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202304023.
6
[Effects of Microplastic High-density Polyethylene on Cotton Growth, Occurrence of wilt, and Rhizosphere Soil Bacterial Community].[微塑料高密度聚乙烯对棉花生长、枯萎病发生及根际土壤细菌群落的影响]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2023 May 8;44(5):2955-2964. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202205332.
7
Dose-dependent toxicity of polyethylene microplastics (PE-MPs) on physiological and biochemical response of blackgram and its associated rhizospheric soil properties.聚乙烯微塑料(PE-MPs)的剂量依赖性毒性对黑豆及其相关根际土壤特性的生理生化反应的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Dec;30(56):119168-119186. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30550-4. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
8
Mitigating microplastic stress on peanuts: The role of biochar-based synthetic community in the preservation of soil physicochemical properties and microbial diversity.减轻花生的微塑料压力:生物炭基合成群落在保护土壤物理化学性质和微生物多样性方面的作用。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jul 1;932:172927. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172927. Epub 2024 May 6.
9
Low-density polyethylene microplastics alter chemical properties and microbial communities in agricultural soil.低密度聚乙烯微塑料改变农业土壤的化学性质和微生物群落。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 28;13(1):16276. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42285-w.
10
Biodegradable microplastics affect tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) growth by interfering rhizosphere key phylotypes.可生物降解的微塑料通过干扰根际关键系统发育型来影响番茄(Solanum lycopersicum L.)的生长。
J Hazard Mater. 2025 Apr 5;487:137208. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137208. Epub 2025 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Alpine radish rhizosphere microbiome assembly and metabolic adaptation under PBAT/PLA humic acid biodegradable mulch films.PBAT/PLA腐殖酸可生物降解地膜覆盖下高山萝卜根际微生物群落组装及代谢适应性
Front Microbiol. 2025 Jul 28;16:1623052. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1623052. eCollection 2025.