• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利南蒂罗尔地区老年人对死亡地点偏好的社会、健康和生活方式决定因素——一项横断面调查研究。

Social, health and lifestyle-related determinants of older adults' preferences for place of death in South Tyrol, Italy - a cross-sectional survey study.

机构信息

Institute of General Practice and Public Health, Claudiana, Lorenz-Böhler-Str. 13, Bolzano-Bozen, 39100, Italy.

Claudiana Research, College of Healthcare Professions, Bolzano-Bozen, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2024 Oct 31;24(1):899. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05485-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-024-05485-1
PMID:39482584
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11526506/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As the global aging population expands, understanding older adults' preferences for place of death becomes pivotal in ensuring person-centered end-of-life care.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the influence of sociodemographic, health, and lifestyle-related factors on end-of-life care preferences of older adults in South Tyrol, Italy.

METHODS

Employing a cross-sectional design, a population-based survey was conducted with a stratified probabilistic sample of adults aged ≥ 75 years in South Tyrol (Autonomous Province of Bolzano/Bozen, Italy). From a randomly selected sample of 3,600 older adults, participants were invited to respond to a questionnaire that included items on older adults' preferences for place of death and socio-demographic and health- and lifestyle-related factors, including frailty (e.g., PRISMA-7). Descriptive and multinomial logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The majority (55.3%) of the 1,695 older adults (participation rate: 47%) expressed a preference for dying at home and 12.7% indicated a desire for specialized end-of-life care in a healthcare facility. However, 27.9% refrained from disclosing their end-of-life care preferences. The factors influencing these preferences concerning the place of death included age, native language, educational level, living situation, and community. Compared to the preference of dying at own home or home of family or friends, older adults aged ≥ 85 years (OR = 0.57, P = 0.002) and living in an urban area (OR = 0.40, P < 0.001) were less likely to prefer dying at a hospital, palliative care unit, or hospice. Older adults living alone (OR = 1.90, P < 0.001), Italian-speaking (OR = 1.46, P = 0.03), and those with an educational level above high school (OR = 1.69, P = 0.002) were more likely to prefer dying at a hospital, palliative care unit, or hospice.

CONCLUSIONS

End-of-life care preferences among older adults in South Tyrol were associated with socio-demographic, yet not health- and lifestyle-related factors. Recognizing and integrating these preferences is essential for developing, implementing, and evaluating interventions to promote advance care planning and provide effective, patient-centered end-of-life care.

摘要

背景

随着全球人口老龄化的加剧,了解老年人对死亡地点的偏好对于确保以患者为中心的临终关怀至关重要。

目的

本研究旨在调查南蒂罗尔(意大利博尔扎诺自治省)老年人的社会人口学、健康和生活方式相关因素对临终关怀偏好的影响。

方法

采用横断面设计,对南蒂罗尔(意大利博尔扎诺自治省)≥75 岁的成年人进行基于人群的概率分层抽样调查。从随机选择的 3600 名老年人中,邀请参与者回答一份问卷,其中包括老年人对死亡地点的偏好以及社会人口学和健康及生活方式相关因素的问题,包括衰弱(例如 PRISMA-7)。进行描述性和多项逻辑回归分析。

结果

在 1695 名老年人(参与率:47%)中,大多数(55.3%)表示希望在家中去世,12.7%表示希望在医疗保健机构接受专门的临终关怀。然而,27.9%的人拒绝透露他们的临终关怀偏好。影响这些死亡地点偏好的因素包括年龄、母语、教育水平、居住状况和社区。与在家中或家人或朋友家去世的偏好相比,年龄≥85 岁的老年人(OR=0.57,P=0.002)和居住在城市地区的老年人(OR=0.40,P<0.001)不太可能选择在医院、姑息治疗单位或临终关怀机构去世。独居的老年人(OR=1.90,P<0.001)、说意大利语的老年人(OR=1.46,P=0.03)和受过高中以上教育的老年人(OR=1.69,P=0.002)更有可能选择在医院、姑息治疗单位或临终关怀机构去世。

结论

南蒂罗尔老年人的临终关怀偏好与社会人口学因素有关,但与健康和生活方式因素无关。认识和整合这些偏好对于制定、实施和评估促进预先护理计划和提供有效、以患者为中心的临终关怀的干预措施至关重要。

相似文献

1
Social, health and lifestyle-related determinants of older adults' preferences for place of death in South Tyrol, Italy - a cross-sectional survey study.意大利南蒂罗尔地区老年人对死亡地点偏好的社会、健康和生活方式决定因素——一项横断面调查研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Oct 31;24(1):899. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05485-1.
2
Community-Dwelling Older Adults' Readiness for Adopting Digital Health Technologies: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.社区居住老年人采用数字健康技术的意愿:横断面调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Apr 30;8:e54120. doi: 10.2196/54120.
3
Social and clinical determinants of preferences and their achievement at the end of life: prospective cohort study of older adults receiving palliative care in three countries.社会和临床决定因素对生命终末期偏好及其实现的影响:对三个国家接受姑息治疗的老年患者的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0648-4.
4
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Preferences of Advance Decisions, End-of-Life Care, and Place of Care and Death in Hong Kong. A Population-Based Telephone Survey of 1067 Adults.香港成人 1067 名的基于人口的电话调查:预先指示、临终关怀、护理和死亡地点的知识、态度和偏好。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;18(4):367.e19-367.e27. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.12.066. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
5
The preferred place of last days: results of a representative population-based public survey.临终首选地:一项基于代表性人群的公共调查结果。
J Palliat Med. 2013 May;16(5):502-8. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0262. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
6
Place of care and death preferences among recently bereaved family members: a cross-sectional survey.近期丧亲家庭成员的护理地点与死亡偏好:一项横断面调查。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 19;14(e3):e2904-e2913. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004697.
7
Preferences for end-of-life care: A cross-sectional survey of Chinese frail nursing home residents.临终关怀偏好:中国虚弱养老院居民的横断面调查。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Apr;32(7-8):1455-1465. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16483. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
8
Predictors of home being the preferred place of death among Japanese older people: JAGES cross-sectional study.预测日本老年人将家作为首选死亡地点的因素:JAGES 横断面研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021 Apr;21(4):345-352. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14135. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
9
Choosing care homes as the least preferred place to die: a cross-national survey of public preferences in seven European countries.将养老院选为最不愿离世的场所:一项对七个欧洲国家公众偏好的跨国调查。
BMC Palliat Care. 2014 Oct 23;13:48. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-13-48.
10
Home-care nurses' community involvement activities and preference regarding the place for end-of-life period among single older adults: A cross-sectional study in Japan.居家护理护士针对单身老年人临终阶段场所的社区参与活动及偏好:日本的一项横断面研究
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Sep;29(5):1584-1593. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13224. Epub 2020 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Sustainability of a Nurse-Led End of Life (PEACH) Community Model of Care.由护士主导的临终关怀(PEACH)社区护理模式的可持续性。
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2025 Aug 22;27(5):E225-34. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000001143.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' preferred place of death: patients are willing to consider their preferences, but someone has to ask them.患者首选的死亡地点:患者愿意考虑自己的偏好,但需要有人询问他们。
Age Ageing. 2021 Nov 10;50(6):2004-2011. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afab176.
2
The INSPIRE Population Survey: development, dissemination and respondent characteristics.INSPIRE 人口调查:发展、传播和应答者特征。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jun 24;21(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01329-3.
3
Instability in Preference for Place of Death Among Patients With Symptoms of Advanced Heart Failure.晚期心力衰竭患者对死亡地点偏好的不稳定性。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Feb;22(2):349.e29-349.e34. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.030. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
4
Place-of-death preferences among patients with cancer and family caregivers in inpatient and outpatient palliative care.癌症患者和门诊及住院姑息治疗患者家属的临终关怀地点选择偏好。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Oct;12(e4):e501-e504. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002019. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
5
End-of-life experience for older adults in Ireland: results from the Irish longitudinal study on ageing (TILDA).爱尔兰老年人的临终体验:爱尔兰老龄化纵向研究(TILDA)的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 14;20(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4978-0.
6
Differences in primary palliative care between people with organ failure and people with cancer: An international mortality follow-back study using quality indicators.器官衰竭患者与癌症患者初级姑息治疗的差异:使用质量指标的国际死亡率回溯研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Oct;32(9):1498-1508. doi: 10.1177/0269216318790386. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
7
Social and clinical determinants of preferences and their achievement at the end of life: prospective cohort study of older adults receiving palliative care in three countries.社会和临床决定因素对生命终末期偏好及其实现的影响:对三个国家接受姑息治疗的老年患者的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0648-4.
8
Comparative economic evaluation of home-based and hospital-based palliative care for terminal cancer patients.居家和住院姑息治疗晚期癌症患者的成本效果比较。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Nov;17(11):2247-2254. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12977. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
9
Is home always the best and preferred place of death?家总是最佳且首选的死亡之地吗?
BMJ. 2015 Oct 7;351:h4855. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4855.
10
Preferences for end-of-life care among community-dwelling older adults and patients with advanced cancer: A discrete choice experiment.社区居住的老年人和晚期癌症患者对临终关怀的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Health Policy. 2015 Nov;119(11):1482-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 11.