Suppr超能文献

经皮微创钢板内固定技术(MIPPO)与改良Stoppa 入路治疗不稳定骨盆前环损伤的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。

Comparison of the MIPPO technique and the modified Stoppa approach in the treatment of unstable anterior pelvic ring injuries: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 31;25(1):873. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07989-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anterior pelvic ring injuries have gradually become common. Using a minimally invasive technique to treat this injury may be feasible if the reduction and stability can be effectively achieved. We describe a percutaneous technique, minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO), to fixate the anterior pelvis via establishing a subperiosteal tunnel between two limited incisions over the iliac crest(s) and pubic ramus in this research.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study comparing the MIPPO technique (n = 60) versus the modified Stoppa approach (n = 53) for anterior pelvic ring injuries with posterior ring instability was performed from September 2016 to January 2023. The relative surgery variables, follow-up function evaluation, and complications were compared in two groups. The reduction quality of fracture was assessed according to the Matta criterion, and the functional score was evaluated using the Majeed score.

RESULTS

All patients completed follow-up, with an average interval of 39.90 ± 17.53 months (range 12-78). In the MIPPO technique group, the surgery interval and blood losses were lower compared to the modified Stoppa approach group (P<0.05). The mean procedure times and intraoperative blood losses were 69.56 ± 14.04 min/side (range 50-110) and 156.23 ± 49.75 mL/side (range 90-250) for unilateral anterior ring MIPPO fixation separately. All patients got a satisfactory reduction of the fracture. In the follow-up, earlier ambulation, shorter postoperative hospital stays, and lower complication rates were observed for patients using the MIPPO technique compared to the modified Stoppa approach (P<0.05). However, there is no statistical difference in these indicators including fracture union interval, full load time, the Majeed score, patient satisfaction level, and return to pre-injured work rate between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This clinical experience gives support for the use of the MIPPO technique to stabilize the anterior pelvis. This minimally invasive technique was an effective and safe surgery method and could obtain satisfactory function results, particularly fitting to part of patients with resistance using the modified Stoppa approach.

摘要

背景

骨盆前环损伤逐渐增多,若能有效复位并维持稳定,微创技术治疗该损伤是可行的。我们通过在髂嵴和耻骨支上的两个小切口之间建立骨膜下隧道,介绍一种微创经皮钢板接骨术(MIPPO)治疗骨盆前环损伤的方法。

方法

回顾性比较研究 2016 年 9 月至 2023 年 1 月采用 MIPPO 技术(n=60)和改良 Stoppa 入路(n=53)治疗合并后环不稳定的骨盆前环损伤的患者,比较两组患者的手术相关变量、随访功能评估和并发症。采用 Matta 标准评估骨折复位质量,采用 Majeed 评分评估功能评分。

结果

所有患者均完成随访,平均随访时间为 39.90±17.53 个月(12-78 个月)。MIPPO 技术组手术时间和出血量均低于改良 Stoppa 组(P<0.05)。单侧骨盆前环 MIPPO 固定的平均手术时间和术中出血量分别为 69.56±14.04 min/侧(50-110 min)和 156.23±49.75 mL/侧(90-250 mL)。所有患者骨折均获得满意复位。随访时,MIPPO 技术组患者更早下地活动、术后住院时间更短、并发症发生率更低(P<0.05)。但两组骨折愈合时间、完全负重时间、Majeed 评分、患者满意度和恢复伤前工作率等指标差异均无统计学意义。

结论

该临床经验支持采用 MIPPO 技术固定骨盆前环。这种微创技术是一种有效且安全的手术方法,可以获得满意的功能结果,特别适合部分对改良 Stoppa 入路有抵抗的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2075/11526597/371ea112d0e5/12891_2024_7989_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验